Rush Admits To Checking Out Gay Porn

[Infohawk]

I'm done
CkG

"I'm done with you now as it is obvious you haven't a clue what you are saying. "
I sympathize (but I do not empathize) with your fatigue and frustration. Reasoning can be hard. If you need to "cut and run" I understand.

I would respond to your incorrect statements but I can see you are tired. Let me know if you regret "cutting and running." I will answer your criticisms.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Infohawk

I'm done
CkG

"I'm done with you now as it is obvious you haven't a clue what you are saying. "
I sympathize (but I do not empathize) with your fatigue and frustration. Reasoning can be hard. If you need to "cut and run" I understand.

I would respond to your incorrect statements but I can see you are tired. Let me know if you regret "cutting and running." I will answer your criticisms.

Ah, yes -the standard troll line.
I am neither fatigued nor frustrated - I am simply done attempting to talk to a wall(you). It's good to see you admitted that reasoning can be hard though, it's a step in the right direction. I learned it when I was young - a few more BOOKS and you may finally get there. Keep striving is my advice to you.

Now again - I'm done trying to talk to you about this because as I said - you seem to have no clue what you are talking about any more so any response by you would be just rehashing what you didn't understand before.

However, if you continue with these troll lines/replies I'll only respond with a *cookie* instead of typing out a post like I did here.

CkG

 

[Infohawk]

"rhetorical - "a rhetorical question is one asked solely to produce an effect (especially to make an assertion) rather than to elicit a reply"
Those two questions were rhetorical.
"he has condemned the abuses" - CkG (11:21pm)
"he did condemn the behavior" - CkG (11:21pm)"

Prove that they were rhetorical. As the author of those questions I can assure you I asked them as honest questions. Why don't you just anwer them since they seem to troulbe you so much.

"You haven't been paying attention if you think "the right" hasn't condemned these abuses."
I have been paying attention. They have not condemned the homosexual aspects of it specifically or the troops for acting homosexually. Please find me a statement by someone on the right saying the troops were screwing up because they were acting gay or anything similar.

I understand it is comforting for you to believe I have no clue what I'm talking about but I am familiar with the right-wing pundits, media, and politicians. Nevertheless, that fact doesn't support or hurt my argument. Instead of attacking me, I suggest you attack.

If you think a reasoned response to your posts is a troll then I guess you could call anyone you disagree with a troll. At any point, you could say you are done and label someone a troll who disagrees with you. That is the intellectual equivalent of "cutting and running."