Originally posted by: Zebo
Also how about swimming... Assuming same intensity levels...
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
running is bad for your knees
Originally posted by: SWScorch
running is a better overall workout, and is only hard on your knees if you're overweight or have bad biomechanics. As a runner of 5-6 years, all my joints are in great shape, and none of my coaches, who have been running all their lives, have ever had any type of chronic joint ailment.
Swimming is even better though. It works your entire body, and is zero-impact. IMO, it's also a lot harder. Not sure how many calories it burns compared to running or biking though.
Originally posted by: SWScorch
running is a better overall workout, and is only hard on your knees if you're overweight or have bad biomechanics. As a runner of 5-6 years, all my joints are in great shape, and none of my coaches, who have been running all their lives, have ever had any type of chronic joint ailment.
Swimming is even better though. It works your entire body, and is zero-impact. IMO, it's also a lot harder. Not sure how many calories it burns compared to running or biking though.
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Fact of the matter is that running is higher impact, correct?
Mountain biking is far more involved and full body than running any day. Better "overall workout" that is. Mountian biking (if you are acutally doing single/double track) requiores alot of upper body exercise and lower body exercise.
Originally posted by: SWScorch
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Fact of the matter is that running is higher impact, correct?
Mountain biking is far more involved and full body than running any day. Better "overall workout" that is. Mountian biking (if you are acutally doing single/double track) requiores alot of upper body exercise and lower body exercise.
yep, running is higher impact, and by that definition more of a stress on the body. Which is why I say running is safe only if you have good form and are made to be a runner.
Never though about mountain biking; I imagine that would be quite the workout too. Biking uphill is very tough (and builds those quads too!)
Zebo: I'd say small doses of running wouldn't be too bad, but biking or swimming would probably be better for you.
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: SWScorch
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Fact of the matter is that running is higher impact, correct?
Mountain biking is far more involved and full body than running any day. Better "overall workout" that is. Mountian biking (if you are acutally doing single/double track) requiores alot of upper body exercise and lower body exercise.
yep, running is higher impact, and by that definition more of a stress on the body. Which is why I say running is safe only if you have good form and are made to be a runner.
Never though about mountain biking; I imagine that would be quite the workout too. Biking uphill is very tough (and builds those quads too!)
Zebo: I'd say small doses of running wouldn't be too bad, but biking or swimming would probably be better for you.
My pool is a little dinky thing about 6 meters long, hardy enough to get interia and speed up, plus it's colder than a witches tit.... Biking? How long does it take to get exhasuted? I can bike all day...I sure as hell can't run all day. Wheres fausto?
yep, running is higher impact, and by that definition more of a stress on the body. Which is why I say running is safe only if you have good form and are made to be a runner.
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: SWScorch
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Fact of the matter is that running is higher impact, correct?
Mountain biking is far more involved and full body than running any day. Better "overall workout" that is. Mountian biking (if you are acutally doing single/double track) requiores alot of upper body exercise and lower body exercise.
yep, running is higher impact, and by that definition more of a stress on the body. Which is why I say running is safe only if you have good form and are made to be a runner.
Never though about mountain biking; I imagine that would be quite the workout too. Biking uphill is very tough (and builds those quads too!)
Zebo: I'd say small doses of running wouldn't be too bad, but biking or swimming would probably be better for you.
My pool is a little dinky thing about 6 meters long, hardy enough to get interia and speed up, plus it's colder than a witches tit.... Biking? How long does it take to get exhasuted? I can bike all day...I sure as hell can't run all day. Wheres fausto?
Try popping your mountain bike into a higher gear and going uphill. You will feel the burn VERY quickly and I can guarantee unless you're an experienced mountain biker you will not last very long on that incline.
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: SWScorch
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Fact of the matter is that running is higher impact, correct?
Mountain biking is far more involved and full body than running any day. Better "overall workout" that is. Mountian biking (if you are acutally doing single/double track) requiores alot of upper body exercise and lower body exercise.
yep, running is higher impact, and by that definition more of a stress on the body. Which is why I say running is safe only if you have good form and are made to be a runner.
Never though about mountain biking; I imagine that would be quite the workout too. Biking uphill is very tough (and builds those quads too!)
Zebo: I'd say small doses of running wouldn't be too bad, but biking or swimming would probably be better for you.
My pool is a little dinky thing about 6 meters long, hardy enough to get interia and speed up, plus it's colder than a witches tit.... Biking? How long does it take to get exhasuted? I can bike all day...I sure as hell can't run all day. Wheres fausto?
Originally posted by: SWScorch
Zebo: I ran the 1600 and 3200 primarily, and now I run 1500, 5000 and 10,000 in college. I prefer cross country though; tracks are boring and there's no mud
Distance running and sprinting are really two different animals. I could never be a sprinter because I quite simply don't have the speed, which is what sprinting is all about. Distance running is much more mental, and even a mediocre runner such as myself can enjoy moderate success simply by being determined and running smart. I don't look down on sprinters like a lot of distance guys do, because I realize that while it's nowhere near as brutal, it takes a lot of hard work, conditioning and natural talent to sprint well.
I could also never be a swimmer. I have a lot of respect for swimmers, because, IMO, it is the hardest activity, and I quite simply can't do it. I can swim maybe two laps and then I'm spent.
Originally posted by: SWScorch
Zebo: I ran the 1600 and 3200 primarily, and now I run 1500, 5000 and 10,000 in college. I prefer cross country though; tracks are boring and there's no mud
Distance running and sprinting are really two different animals. I could never be a sprinter because I quite simply don't have the speed, which is what sprinting is all about. Distance running is much more mental, and even a mediocre runner such as myself can enjoy moderate success simply by being determined and running smart. I don't look down on sprinters like a lot of distance guys do, because I realize that while it's nowhere near as brutal, it takes a lot of hard work, conditioning and natural talent to sprint well.
I could also never be a swimmer. I have a lot of respect for swimmers, because, IMO, it is the hardest activity, and I quite simply can't do it. I can swim maybe two laps and then I'm spent.
Originally posted by: Doug3737
Originally posted by: SWScorch
Zebo: I ran the 1600 and 3200 primarily, and now I run 1500, 5000 and 10,000 in college. I prefer cross country though; tracks are boring and there's no mud
Distance running and sprinting are really two different animals. I could never be a sprinter because I quite simply don't have the speed, which is what sprinting is all about. Distance running is much more mental, and even a mediocre runner such as myself can enjoy moderate success simply by being determined and running smart. I don't look down on sprinters like a lot of distance guys do, because I realize that while it's nowhere near as brutal, it takes a lot of hard work, conditioning and natural talent to sprint well.
I could also never be a swimmer. I have a lot of respect for swimmers, because, IMO, it is the hardest activity, and I quite simply can't do it. I can swim maybe two laps and then I'm spent.
Well said. Being in running and swimming shape are two totally different things. When I was running XC in high school, i was in great running shape... but put me in a pool and I'd be lucky to do 4 lengths.
Originally posted by: Amused
Do both. I have found I get great benefits (fat loss and fitness level) from regularly switching off. I'll run for a few months, then bike for a few months, then do elliptical machines and back again.
Each time I switch, the intensity level and learning curve start anew, and I get more of the "newbie" fast acting benefits that so often go away when we plateau.
My new gym is putting in endless pools, so I may give swimming a try, too. If it works for me, I'll add it to the mix.