Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Jest3r
It doesn't look very good at all unfortunately. I was a huge Diablo 2 fan back when it came out in 2000, and it plays at 800 x 600. Well 8 years later I tried to play it full screen on a 24 inch 1920 x 1200 monitor and it looked absolutely awful. I ended up playing the game in a windowed mode, which was more enjoyable.
That's odd. If you have an option to maintain aspect ratio, 800x600 should have perfect 1 to 4 pixel scaling. If its stretched to fill the whole panel horizontally as well, then yeah, that would look bad. The monitor's scaling usually looks bad when its forced to make guesses between pixels, but there is none of that going on in this case. Are you sure you just didn't remember how low of a resolution 8x6 really was?

I know I get that all the time.
Anyway, a handful of monitors that few people own have options to control 1:1 or aspect ratio scaling within them. If you have one, well, then you're all set.
If you don't, you still have some options as long as you have DVI or another digital interface connecting your monitor.
If that is the case, both ATI and nvidia have options within the drivers.
For ATI, it took them forever to implement, but starting with catalyst 8.3? x1xxx cards and above can be told to use 1:1 centered or scale while maintaining aspect ratio. I've had good luck with this, its worked great for me.
For Nvidia, they have broken this feature multiple times. Last I heard, it was fixed for
most people. For myself, whatever nvidia's implementation is just plain will not work with my viewsonic widescreen. It seems only some monitors work with their implementation, based on a good deal of testing and research on my part. I eventually just gave up and sidegraded to an ATI card. They may have fixed this by now, but at this point I no longer care personally!