Without any other knowledge, I'm going to assume that both tasks are considered equal in effort... and should also be considered equal in effort to how sprinting at our current max speed already is. So my out of shape ass wouldn't be able to run at 100mph or fly at 10mph for very long. So given that, flying doesn't seem to be that useful.
I was wondering about the energy demands on the human body.
Run 100mph for no more than 10 miles, and then stop to drink a gallon of water and take in at least 3,000 calories, and enjoy shaving a month off your lifespan? Or the chronic effects of 100mph wind on your body. And the bug impacts....ew.
Flying: Only if the wind is calm, otherwise your 10mph speed is a bit of a problem? What's the mechanism of flight?
:awe:
Assuming simplicity, 100mph running seems the way to go for me, if we're talking widespread implementation of this. Infrastructure would surely adapt, and even if you aren't going in a straight line, taking a non-direct route at 10x the speed of a straight line is very likely to be a shorter trip.
Assuming it's just me, I suppose flight would seem more advantageous due to the versatility.
It also might make it possible to survive plane crashes.
Fly, absolutely. Lots of stuff can catch you running 100 mph. Very few things can catch you flying 10 mph, at least very few things that would try.
It's not a very quick rate of ascent though, even if you're trying to avoid something fairly primitive, like a bow and arrow, or.....maybe a gun.
In time, you'll probably see more police helicopters in the area.
😉
Why would anyone choose run?
Depends what your goals are: Fast transit over land, or versatility. (Again, assuming wind won't hinder your speedy 10mph transit.)
Also: Canada geese can fly at 40+ mph. Hopefully you don't ever end up in their airspace. Or blue jays. Or swans.
:hmm:
100mph running speed.
With appropriate footwear, it may be possible to run across water.