blackened23
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2011
- 8,548
- 2
- 0
but why release a new series of cards before the 7XXX series has even been out for a year? why lose all the potential revenue?
i'm no big-shot product manager, but if it were up to me, i'd wait at least 6 months after the last mainstream product has been released.
but why release a new series of cards before the 7XXX series has even been out for a year? why lose all the potential revenue?
i'm no big-shot product manager, but if it were up to me, i'd wait at least 6 months after the last mainstream product has been released.
Any more than Kepler might "kill" sales of the 7xxx series? Those who want Fastest Right Now will still buy Tahiti. Those who were going to wait and see, will keep waiting and seeing, if not for Kepler, then for HD 8xxx. There is a mushy middle though that may wait (the area between GTX 580 and, say, HD 5770, which has a lot of options both in 40nm and 28nm).
Not sure about you, but I don't buy my GPUs at $500 to only be top-dog for <7-8months.
Folks who bought 5870/5970s or 480s enjoyed that performance for a long time. I will upgrade when Kepler is out and we know more about what 8970 looks like. Seems silly to re-release a whole new product line within a year though...
How to get this rumour:
1. Take one part good OCing 7970
2. Take two parts mistyped Sapphire sheet
3. Create BS!
This is why AMD shouldn't have launched as the 7970, now they're stuck on model numbers. If New Zealand is launched as the 7990, there really isn't much room for an upclocked 79xx series card.
