blastingcap
Diamond Member
- Sep 16, 2010
- 6,654
- 5
- 76
People like anandtheman...are you being deliberatly stupid?
Do you consider yourself to be on the "green team" then?
People like anandtheman...are you being deliberatly stupid?
Do you consider yourself to be on the "green team" then?
Didnt you just ask him this once already?
At least two of those sound more like they are joking (as indicated by their emoticons).You sound surprised and act like I am the only with this sentiment...funny!
I dont think so,i was looking for the incredible hulk exploding from his shirt vid,couldnt find one though hahahI didn't see him answer. Did he answer?
I didn't see him answer. Did he answer?
You sure we are readning the same thread?
Beause it sure as hell don't sound like it![]()
Oh really? Then why does he act like he has an issue with Nvidia? Why is he calling Nvidia a liar? Claiming they have no credibility.
Sure sounds like he has a beef with Nvidia like I said.
but offered replacements if the customer wanted and there were rumors of a recall, but Intel came out and said the issue was not true and there is no recall
I hope u mean unusual as I recently bought an Asus Gtx 680There are now 6 different GTX670 cards and 2 Asus GTX680 cards on Newegg.
Since more cards have been shipped to retail channels, I would find that very usual if NV was secretly preparing to recall the entire series.
You guys are arguing past one another. The Pro-NV club is arguing that the rumor is probably baseless, while the Anti-NV club is arguing that Nvidia can't be trusted to take responsibility because of their past misdeeds.
Both statements are obviously true.
How about this?
"The chance that this rumor is accurate is almost as minuscule as the chance that Nvidia would fess up to it if it was."
Can everyone agree on that statement? Ok? Then lets end this pointless thread.
"EVGA has isolated this problem to an early batch of GTX 670 Superclock cards (P/N: 02G-P3-2672-KR) that were not properly screened during QA/QC procedure. We have already been working with our partners to retest this particular batch. In the meantime, our R&D has also done numerous tests, burn in and component quality verification to confirm that the EVGA GTX 670 Superclock is a well designed product."
"If any of your users are experiencing issues with their EVGA GTX 670 Superclock boards, please ask them to email Jacob Freeman [mailto link], and he will assist in getting them setup with an RMA cross shipment along with EVGA upgrading them to the GTX 670 FTW version (P/N: 02G-P3-2685-KR) for the inconvenience of this."
You guys are arguing past one another. The Pro-NV club is arguing that the rumor is probably baseless, while the Anti-NV club is arguing that Nvidia can't be trusted to take responsibility because of their past misdeeds.
Both statements are obviously true.
How about this?
"The chance that this rumor is accurate is almost as minuscule as the chance that Nvidia would fess up to it if it was."
Can everyone agree on that statement? Ok? Then lets end this pointless thread.
I'd like to add that I'm sure that a lot of people who own the affected model of card will complain, even if they don't have trouble, just to get a replacement FTW for free.
You guys are arguing past one another. The Pro-NV club is arguing that the rumor is probably baseless, while the Anti-NV club is arguing that Nvidia can't be trusted to take responsibility because of their past misdeeds.
why not just get a non reference cooled 670 in the first place since they are the same or about the same price anyway?I've had 3870 and 4870 cards, my current choices are 7850 @ £200 (UK prices) or 670 @ £300 for reference cooler or £370 for Asus. I might go 670 reference route first, see how noisy is it, then get an after market cooler..
My point is there isn't even an alternative gfx card from AMD at the same price.. unless you're mad and go for a 7950/7970, which is unlikely.
why not just get a non reference cooled 670 in the first place since they are the same or about the same price anyway?