Some new Fury X pics from PCPer
http://www.pcper.com/news/Graphics-...X-Graphics-Card-Pictured-Uses-2-x-8-pin-Power
http://www.pcper.com/news/Graphics-...X-Graphics-Card-Pictured-Uses-2-x-8-pin-Power
Yes, that's true - if they can pull that off. But will it still use >300W in GPGPU and FurMark?
Yes, that's true - if they can pull that off. But will it still use >300W in GPGPU and FurMark?
looks like something that would work even in a htpc case.Looks really small.
Yes, that's true - if they can pull that off. But will it still use >300W in GPGPU and FurMark?
Sweet the tube material is much nicer on this card. Looking forward to it, patience is waning ever so little with each leak. Card is small too, much more cases it can fit into.
AMD appears to be bypassing traditional PC hardware sites with this launch and is giving them no advanced briefings or details on their upcoming graphics cards. We are glad to see AMD supporting the end users, but it is unusual to see the traditional hardware sites and media not briefed this close to new product launch. In the past when traditional hardware reviewers aren’t given a product with enough time to properly test it there is usually a reason for doing so.
Hi. Since you are absolutely obsessed with FurMark, can you do the forum a favor and explain it's relevance to anything, ever?

It's a bold move cotton. Let's see if it pays off.
http://www.legitreviews.com/amd-shows-radeon-r9-300-series-cards-to-red-team-plus_165838
It's a bold move cotton. Let's see if it pays off.
http://www.legitreviews.com/amd-shows-radeon-r9-300-series-cards-to-red-team-plus_165838
If AMD is bypassing traditional hardware sites with the 300 series, then that is all but confirmation the entire 300 series is a rebrand, sans a fully unlocked Tonga which probably isn't too exciting anyways due to perf/w, unless it's priced ultra-competitive against the gtx 960.
If AMD is bypassing traditional hardware sites with the 300 series, then that is all but confirmation the entire 300 series is a rebrand, sans a fully unlocked Tonga which probably isn't too exciting anyways due to perf/w, unless it's priced ultra-competitive against the gtx 960.
If AMD is bypassing traditional hardware sites with the 300 series, then that is all but confirmation the entire 300 series is a rebrand, sans a fully unlocked Tonga which probably isn't too exciting anyways due to perf/w, unless it's priced ultra-competitive against the gtx 960.
Looks really expensive.
When was the last time a top tier card wasn't sent out to reviewers? I believe that would be the Titan Z...
Hope that isn't the case this time around.
They are just whining because they aren't the first to see the new hardware.All sites or only NV PR sites like Pcper and hardwarecanucks?
If all sites i am not sure about that...that mean no reviews at all?
http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=5094927&postcount=9The announcement date is E3 the 16th during the announced livestream and later that'll be followed by the reviews. I can't share that date though.
I am just glad amd finally got the balls to tell these websites to suck it. :twisted: it is never too late to grow a pair, especially it is for amd's own good.I'm ok with AMD not sending samples to obvious Nvidia marketing sites like pcper, but, it does make you curious.