- Mar 5, 2001
- 18,256
- 68
- 86
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...uy-requesting-tech-help-to-strip-vips-emails/
That'll wipe right out.
How was this not found before?
That'll wipe right out.
How was this not found before?
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...uy-requesting-tech-help-to-strip-vips-emails/
That'll wipe right out.
How was this not found before?
So, the email cited was from 8/19/2015. Apparently, the server was turned over to the FBI on or before 8/13/2015-
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hill...l-server-justice-department/story?id=33069662
So there's your conspiracy theory, shot right in the ass.
So, the email cited was from 8/19/2015. Apparently, the server was turned over to the FBI on or before 8/13/2015-
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hill...l-server-justice-department/story?id=33069662
So there's your conspiracy theory, shot right in the ass.
The Reddit thread was from 2 years ago, before the turn over and after the Congressional subpoena. He had an "ohh shit" moment, after a conference call, and tried to remove email addresses and references to Hill. Why? Because they would have been responsive to a subpoena and searchable during e-discovery.
Since he couldn't remove the info, he removed the entire server, with Bleachbit.
He literally says in the post that he doesn't want the email address to be publicized and it's the only thing mentioned. It's odd that these people are literate enough to read winger blogs but the actual source is always too challenging.
The more popular version of this story has him asking how to delete emails, presumably because the audience of those blogs are too goddamn stupid to understand how emails work.
We need actual proof, imbecile.How much actual proof do you zombies need?
I swear if Hillary herself held a live TV press conference and openly confessed to every crime she was accused of liberals would find a way to act like smart asses and explain it away.
How much actual proof do you zombies need?
I swear if Hillary herself held a live TV press conference and openly confessed to every crime she was accused of liberals would find a way to act like smart asses and explain it away.
How much actual proof do you zombies need?
I swear if Hillary herself held a live TV press conference and openly confessed to every crime she was accused of liberals would find a way to act like smart asses and explain it away.
How much actual proof do you zombies need?
I swear if Hillary herself held a live TV press conference and openly confessed to every crime she was accused of liberals would find a way to act like smart asses and explain it away.
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...uy-requesting-tech-help-to-strip-vips-emails/
That'll wipe right out.
How was this not found before?
How much actual proof do you zombies need?
I swear if Hillary herself held a live TV press conference and openly confessed to every crime she was accused of liberals would find a way to act like smart asses and explain it away.
We need actual proof, imbecile.
We'll all wait right here while you continue failing to get it and instead blame libruuls for not agreeing with your delusions.
Thanks in advance, champ.
If you want to see a deranged delusional idiot in apoplectic fits, just look in the mirror, champ.I always love when the idiots on the left hysterically deny reality. This weekend absolutely murdered their "Islam is a religion of peace" garbage, and this latest devastating update on Hilary's rank incompetence vis-a-vis confidential information is sure to send them into apoplectic fits![]()
Probably because no one reads "the conservative treehouse."
I always love when the idiots on the left hysterically deny reality. This weekend absolutely murdered their "Islam is a religion of peace" garbage, and this latest devastating update on Hilary's rank incompetence vis-a-vis confidential information is sure to send them into apoplectic fits![]()
The post proves that he wanted to remove a private email address from emails that were to be publicized. You know those emails that are generally signed/etc by the sender in the other fields and body/sig, etc. Evidently reality didn't prove enough so those blogs for dumbasses had to exaggerate it into some kind of evil master plan like from the cartoons.
The same House that picked up Fast And Furious, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi Emails, and Benghazi.Why would they be publicized? If they were under Congressional subpoena it's not like they would have been out in the open. Even if they were, they were subject to FOIA, meaning they would be "public" anyway.
No, the far more likely explanation is that he wanted to strip the email address off the emails for discovery. Now, why would he do that? Let's say the emails said "hrc@clintonemail.com" or whatever. When answering for a subpoena, you would take all user emails from that address and search them for common terms, like Benghazi, or Iraq, or whatever.
Now let's say that that email address didn't exist? Could it then be searched? Ohh, no. You could just rename it Huma, or Betty Rubble, or Wilma Fintstone, and it'd be gone. Poof. No more Clinton emails.
House has picked this up. It's going to blow wide open.
Ohh, and apparently, this isn't covered by the immunity. Whoops!
The post proves that he wanted to remove a private email address from emails that were to be publicized. You know those emails that are generally signed/etc by the sender in the other fields and body/sig, etc. Evidently reality didn't prove enough so those blogs for dumbasses had to exaggerate it into some kind of evil master plan like from the cartoons.
Publicized without the private email addresses, but I can see how that's too hard to make sense of compared to the rube goldberg masterplan of the week.Why would they be publicized? If they were under Congressional subpoena it's not like they would have been out in the open. Even if they were, they were subject to FOIA, meaning they would be "public" anyway. Your explanation makes no sense.
No, the far more likely explanation is that he wanted to strip the email address off the emails for discovery. Now, why would he do that? Let's say the emails said "hrc@clintonemail.com" or whatever. When answering for a subpoena, you would take all user emails from that address and search them for common terms, like Benghazi, or Iraq, or whatever.
Now let's say that that email address didn't exist? Could it then be searched? Ohh, no. You could just rename it Huma, or Betty Rubble, or Wilma Fintstone, and it'd be gone. Poof. No more Clinton emails.
House has picked this up. It's going to blow wide open.
Ohh, and apparently, this isn't covered by the immunity. Whoops!
Why would they be publicized? If they were under Congressional subpoena it's not like they would have been out in the open. Even if they were, they were subject to FOIA, meaning they would be "public" anyway. Your explanation makes no sense.
Which is why it is against Federal Law to scrub.You just contradicted yourself & don't even realize it. They knew they had to comply with FOIA requests long before congress issued any subpoenas. Therefore they knew the material was intended for publication.
