• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

RSX vs CELICA

which do u think is faster? the RSX typeS or the CElica GTS. i kno the rsx has more hp about 20 but the celica is lighter by about 300lbs. i think the rsx body style is is way to big compared tot he old integra. i think celica has a better lookin body the the rsx. which would u buy if u had to choose? and the price difference is realyy big RSX coupe cost 26 if u have everything u want and the typeS is like 30 for everything in it. the celica gt is about 22 for everything and the GTS is about 26 for everything there is a big difference in price for a car the prolly performs about the same. i bet the ride of the celica is way better then the rsx because its toyota and toyota has like the best ride u can by besides maybe lexus which is the same thing
 


<< i bet the ride of the celica is way better then the rsx because its toyota and toyota has like the best ride u can by besides maybe lexus which is the same thing >>



joo = retarded
 
no comment... the only thing I have to say is the Neon SRT will own them both for a cheaper price 😛😉
 
id get the celica gt-s just because im biased. 😛 a recent comparison (car and driver? road and track? forgot) showed that the type-s isnt as sharp as its predecessor... probably cuz they got rid of the wishbone suspension. 😱 and they actually picked the celica. either way... both cars are nice...and have nothing to give you below 5000-6000rpm. although id still pick the gt-s with the action package... and i'm all set. wait for the type-r if you want. btw... if someone was dimwitted enough to blow the engine... due to the high redline and close gates of both engines... toyota will cover the new engine in the warranty and replace it for you but honda won't. 😛
 


<< no comment... the only thing I have to say is the Neon SRT will own them both for a cheaper price 😛😉 >>



yeah but the neon looks like butt tho....
 


<< yeah but the neon looks like butt tho.... >>


That's your opinion. I tend to think the Celica looks like ass, but the RSX is nice. the SRT looks cool, but it's not by any means the best looking car out there. Doesn't matter though, it'll be faster 🙂
 
I'd get the RSX, (I'm biased too) but I don't really care which one is faster. I'm sure they're both extremely fun to drive, and if you're not on the track, you're running the race solo, so the fun-to-drive factor is everything.

Boyracer's a Toyota Fan. I'm a Honda fan. I'm sure we can both agree that Honda and Toyota both make excellent cars. 🙂
 
Any of you guys check out the new redesign of the Sentra SE-R. It has 175 hp and it can be had for under 20k. It has the same engine as the new Nissan Altima.
Here is the spec link for it


Sentra SE-R SPEC V type.

Oh by the way, for 26K, I would be looking at Altima v6 which packs 245 HP or Honda Accord V6. 26k dollars is asking way too much for the Acura RSX. You could get also get Mits Eclispe V6, etc....list can go on and on.
 
The RSX isn't a very nice car, IMO. It's awfully tall and narrow, looks like a minivan. I wouldn't be surprised if it's skidpad performance is the worst in it's class.
The Celica is a little nicer, and sportier. I've neither driven nor been inside either though, and really have no interest in either at this point.
 


<< The RSX isn't a very nice car, IMO. It's awfully tall and narrow, looks like a minivan. >>


It just takes a little getting used to... i didnt like the celica at first... but when i saw the action package...it looked like a boyracer's car...and i loved it. hahaha... if you want the boyracer image of the rsx, like me... wait for the Type-R. 😀
 


<< The RSX isn't a very nice car, IMO. It's awfully tall and narrow, looks like a minivan. I wouldn't be surprised if it's skidpad performance is the worst in it's class.
The Celica is a little nicer, and sportier. I've neither driven nor been inside either though, and really have no interest in either at this point.
>>



Just for fun, replace RSX with Chevy Metro. This statement then becomes much more accurate.
 
RSX Type-S is 23,500 including leather, moonroof, 6 CD changer, and pretty much every option standard. The only options are cosmetic body peices which don't affect performace at all. The RSX is hardly larger than the old integras- still a compact.

The Celica definitely has a more aggressive appearance though it does border on boy racerish vs the understated RSX exterior- its up to personal preference though I do prefer the RSX exterior.

Interior no doubt goes to the RSX- more roomy, more features standard, better ergonomics, far more luxurious feel. However the Celica still has a top notch interior with the excellent Toyota materials you expect.

Power to weight ratios are pretty much equal so full throttle starts are in essence equal- it'll come down to the driver if both cars are driven equally.

However due to the its larger displacement and i-VTEC, the RSX has more usable torque lower in the rev range, making it easier to drive 6/10s in, much easier around the city. Also the 6-speed in the RSX is easily superior to the notchy GTS 6 speed gearbox.

Where the celica shines is in handling- with more aggressive tires, lower COG, superb suspension setup, the Celica has superior handling and response. Though I must throw in- the RSX is no slouch and a $200 spring kit(Comptech baby) does do wonders to the Type-S.

Overall, if you get the options in the GTS to bring it up to the standard Type-S level, the prices are pretty much equivilant. Both are excellent cars, its really a matter of personal preference.

I bought the Type-S b/c I felt it was a better combination of sport and luxury than the GTS and at my age, I want both.

Review including GTS, RSX, Eclipse, GTI
 


<< just get a 4th Gen Prelude VTEC kthx

😀
>>



I second that! Prelude all the way!! Or a '98 240SX if you want something different. It handles as good as the Celica/RSX but its slower in the straight line. However it does have more torque. Plus with the money you save from buying the Celica/RSX you can always do the SR20DET swap and get 220hp.
 


<< I second that! Prelude all the way!! Or a '98 240SX if you want something different. It handles as good as the Celica/RSX but its slower in the straight line. However it does have more torque. Plus with the money you save from buying the Celica/RSX you can always do the SR20DET swap and get 220hp. >>


Uhhh I dont know about the prelude... but i like the Silvia idea. Kick ass car no doubt after you swap in your sr20det... but a used car and an engine swap=headaches. Probably suits the die-hard import lover who would go through all that. Just my .02.
 


<< the EVO VII will eat them both for lunch when 2003 rolls around >>


Hey nice car. How much is the retail on one of those?

More than you can afford pal. Mitsubishi.
 
Back
Top