• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Rosetta vs. Parallels in performance

Parasitic

Diamond Member
So I'm sure some (if not most) of you know what MATLAB is. I have a copy of student version MATLAB R2006b I bought last year and while MATLAB has Mac support I'm not sure if I should run it natively in MacOS or have it installed through my Windows 2000 virtual machine. This version of MATLAB does not support Intel Macs so I assume it'll run under Rosetta?

What would you do?
 
They still don't have the Intel patch out? Jeez!

I think no matter which way you slice it, it will be quite slow. I had Matlab installed on both OS X and Windows XP on my MacBook... and really, I liked it better in Windows since it ran a little better, and installed about 20 times easier. But, it was really slow in VM
 
Originally posted by: TheStu
They still don't have the Intel patch out? Jeez!

I think no matter which way you slice it, it will be quite slow. I had Matlab installed on both OS X and Windows XP on my MacBook... and really, I liked it better in Windows since it ran a little better, and installed about 20 times easier. But, it was really slow in VM

R2007c has Intel suport, but not my R2006b.
 
Back
Top