Yeah, sorry for addressing you.. I should have known better.
What is ironic is that you use the term paulbot. Bot coming from robot, doing as instructed, not thinking for themselves etc...
The ironic part is that you're in here calling people paulbots. So you're simply parroting things other people have said. So, you're the bot in the situation.
In no universe can using the suffix "bot" and appending it to Ron Paul's name be considering parroting what other people have said. I'm sorry to tell you, but if me hearing the term "Paulbot" before in my life and then using that word because it fits you turds perfectly is something you consider "ironic", then your reasoning applies to everyone that ever lived and it's a pointless characterization. You can continue saying these things but at this point you're just embarrassing yourself.
And beside that you're just an idiot.
None of the stuff you listed off is a catchphrase. Freedom and liberty are things that any american should want to protect. If you're against protecting freedom, liberty and the constitution, you're not american.
First, I called them words, not just catchphrases, that Paulbots repeat. Second, I said many Paulbots don't actually understand the words and catchphrases they use. I listed them for you, saying nothing about the validity of the ideas.
In the future please read carefully because, again, you're further embarrassing yourself.
But you're such an idiot you probably sat back from 2000-2008 condemning bush and then cheering obama for the same actions, since you're an idiot.
So, run along. I'm through with you kiddo.
You were through long ago when you wimped out of explaining your positions.
You're a fucking idiot.
Sorry, but this deserved it's own quote post. If you're too dumb to see the blatant black balling and smearing of Ron Paul all year, you have no hope at all.
All year all of the major media outlets have been telling the dumb people who sit in front of their tv's that they can either vote for [flavor of the month candidate] or romney because Paul can't be elected.
That's the only mention paul gets.
Lol, you're such a turd this isn't even fair. The exact opposite of what you say is EASILY verifiable with simple Internet searches. The
polls show Paul is not electable. He barely cracks double digits nationally and his ideas are unpopular. Don't believe me? Polls are absolutely, uniformly in agreement, try
here,
here and
here.
Still confused? Seek a college education.
Look at the news now. Paul has been leading on most polls in iowa and yet most media outlets outright refuse to say that Ron Paul is #1. They had no problem saying that Gingrich, a lying, cheating, stealing, slimey bastard was #1... but they just can stomach it that Ron Paul is #1.
Again, you're horridly slow if you can't see the media has talked about Paul leading in Iowa.
Google is your friend.