Third parties and independents don't get invited to debates. That's just a fact. Ross Perot had enough money and pull to personally buy his way into the debates. Other candidates aren't so lucky, and if they want to have any chance of their message being heard, they have to fly the flag of one of the big two. Even if Paul doesn't get nominated (and realistically his chances aren't very good) at least his being in the Republican debates has interested people in his ideas. And that's what is truly important. The idea is more important than the man.Originally posted by: Scribe
Ron Paul should drop the Republican ticket, run as an independent and win.
Originally posted by: azazyel
hmm, I can still feel the warmth of Pabster's embers.
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: azazyel
hmm, I can still feel the warmth of Pabster's embers.
HAHAHA! i just loled hahanice
Ron Paul makes a fool of himself...
Suggests Mall Security Officers doing better job than Armed Forces in Iraq
Originally posted by: Scribe
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: Scribe
Ron Paul should drop the Republican ticket, run as an independent and win.
He can do it. He'll raise the money no problem, especially if he's a VIABLE candidate. And if he declares at the end of the Republican primaries, when there are two frontrunners (Democrat and Republican), he will blast them away because all the candidates are USELESS.
if he ran as an independent, he wouldn't have nearly the chance he has now of winning... not only that, but no one would hear his message. by being in a major party, he can voice his opinions during the debates.
he's more of a libertarian anyways.
I agree.. he should ride them like a cheap wh0r3 until the primaries end. Then take the momentum and start a national campaign running independant.
He can use them for the filthy politicians they are.
Originally posted by: ayabe
Ron Paul makes Republican's feel shameful for what they have become and what they have allowed W. to do in their name.
Originally posted by: Scribe
Ron Paul should drop the Republican ticket, run as an independent and win.
He can do it. He'll raise the money no problem, especially if he's a VIABLE candidate. And if he declares at the end of the Republican primaries, when there are two frontrunners (Democrat and Republican), he will blast them away because all the candidates are USELESS.
Originally posted by: ScottMac
Kind of sad the lengths the extreme right are going to try and discredit Paul.
He discredits himself, he doesn't need any help. No one has to do anything .. in fact, no one *is* doing anything ... that's his problem. The few people that have heard of him (aside from his local fan club) don't like what he says because he's a loon.
Ron Paul makes Republican's feel shameful do in their name.
No, he doesn't. Speak for yourself.
If you're ashamed, go hang your head and feel ashamed.
Ron Paul does not (and will not) make me feel ashamed about anything. He's been a crackpot his whole career and it doesn't look like that's gonna change anytime soon.
Originally posted by: Pabster
Perhaps I should have said Paul agreed with the interviewer's assertion that Mall Security Officers are doing a better job than our Armed Forces.
No matter which way you Paul fans try to spin it, the guy is ridiculous. Any sane candidate would have disavowed that suggestion immediately.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
ScottMac
For as ardent a Republican as you seem to be, you should be ashamed. No wonder you hate Paul and his ideas, you and the other cockroaches fear the light.
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: Pabster
I never said that he said it directly. He SUGGESTED it. Listen to the video and his response when the interviewer poses that question.
actually, the interviewer suggested it. you're wrong again.
RP: It's a lot easier to kill americans when we're in their country than it is to come over here.
Interviewer: It's a hell of a lot easier, to use your terminology, to blow up a mall if they could pull it off because people in a mall aren't armed...
RP: But we have security... That's uhhh...
Interviewer: So you're saying that security guards in a mall do a better job than US Marines in Iraq.
RP: So far... So far they're doing pretty well. I mean we haven't had... How has it come that we haven't had another attack (unintelligible)
Interviewer: Maybe it's because of things like the patriot act tht you want to get rid of. We don't know... we don't know.
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: Pabster
I never said that he said it directly. He SUGGESTED it. Listen to the video and his response when the interviewer poses that question.
actually, the interviewer suggested it. you're wrong again.
The interviewer suggested it and RP agreed with it.
RP: It's a lot easier to kill americans when we're in their country than it is to come over here.
Interviewer: It's a hell of a lot easier, to use your terminology, to blow up a mall if they could pull it off because people in a mall aren't armed...
RP: But we have security... That's uhhh...
Interviewer: So you're saying that security guards in a mall do a better job than US Marines in Iraq.
RP: So far... So far they're doing pretty well. I mean we haven't had... How has it come that we haven't had another attack (unintelligible)
Interviewer: Maybe it's because of things like the patriot act tht you want to get rid of. We don't know... we don't know.
It's a bit of a "gotcha" moment on the part of the interviewer but RP clearly agreed with his comments. Reading that and listening to the interview I agree with the OP's statement. RP's statement does in fact suggest that rent-a-cops in shopping malls are doing a better job than Marines in Iraq.
He also wants to abolish the CIA and has said that if people were allowed to carry guns on planes 9/11 would have never happened. The guy is a nut. And the people who refuse to question some of his more outlandish statements are also nuts. It's like he's Jesus or something.
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: Pabster
I never said that he said it directly. He SUGGESTED it. Listen to the video and his response when the interviewer poses that question.
actually, the interviewer suggested it. you're wrong again.
The interviewer suggested it and RP agreed with it.
RP: It's a lot easier to kill americans when we're in their country than it is to come over here.
Interviewer: It's a hell of a lot easier, to use your terminology, to blow up a mall if they could pull it off because people in a mall aren't armed...
RP: But we have security... That's uhhh...
Interviewer: So you're saying that security guards in a mall do a better job than US Marines in Iraq.
RP: So far... So far they're doing pretty well. I mean we haven't had... How has it come that we haven't had another attack (unintelligible)
Interviewer: Maybe it's because of things like the patriot act tht you want to get rid of. We don't know... we don't know.
It's a bit of a "gotcha" moment on the part of the interviewer but RP clearly agreed with his comments. Reading that and listening to the interview I agree with the OP's statement. RP's statement does in fact suggest that rent-a-cops in shopping malls are doing a better job than Marines in Iraq.
He also wants to abolish the CIA and has said that if people were allowed to carry guns on planes 9/11 would have never happened. The guy is a nut. And the people who refuse to question some of his more outlandish statements are also nuts. It's like he's Jesus or something.
he was talking about preventing a terrorist attack from happening. the soldiers in iraq aren't keeping any kind of terrorist attack from happening on american soil. the chances of mall security thwarting a terrorist act in a mall on our soil are far greater than those of an american soldier int iraq thwarting a terrorist act in a mall on our soil.
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: Pabster
I never said that he said it directly. He SUGGESTED it. Listen to the video and his response when the interviewer poses that question.
actually, the interviewer suggested it. you're wrong again.
The interviewer suggested it and RP agreed with it.
RP: It's a lot easier to kill americans when we're in their country than it is to come over here.
Interviewer: It's a hell of a lot easier, to use your terminology, to blow up a mall if they could pull it off because people in a mall aren't armed...
RP: But we have security... That's uhhh...
Interviewer: So you're saying that security guards in a mall do a better job than US Marines in Iraq.
RP: So far... So far they're doing pretty well. I mean we haven't had... How has it come that we haven't had another attack (unintelligible)
Interviewer: Maybe it's because of things like the patriot act tht you want to get rid of. We don't know... we don't know.
It's a bit of a "gotcha" moment on the part of the interviewer but RP clearly agreed with his comments. Reading that and listening to the interview I agree with the OP's statement. RP's statement does in fact suggest that rent-a-cops in shopping malls are doing a better job than Marines in Iraq.
He also wants to abolish the CIA and has said that if people were allowed to carry guns on planes 9/11 would have never happened. The guy is a nut. And the people who refuse to question some of his more outlandish statements are also nuts. It's like he's Jesus or something.
he was talking about preventing a terrorist attack from happening. the soldiers in iraq aren't keeping any kind of terrorist attack from happening on american soil. the chances of mall security thwarting a terrorist act in a mall on our soil are far greater than those of an american soldier int iraq thwarting a terrorist act in a mall on our soil.
Spin it/apologize for it anyway you want. It's another careless comment to throw on his pile of careless comments. Seriously, other than his economic platform, I have no idea why you guys like him so much. He's a nut.
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
The interviewer suggested it and RP agreed with it.
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
The interviewer suggested it and RP agreed with it.
Precisely. It is unfortunate the Paul nutjobs continue to obfuscate this.
Any sane candidate would have disputed that and wrote it off as BS before the interviewer finished. Paul went right along for the ride.
We could post a whole page of stupid Paul quotes, of course, this one just happened to be a recent blurb.
