Ron Paul leading in MN!!!

[Robor]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: palehorse74
Wrong about what!?

Originally posted by: palehorse74
So, like the internet polling, I think his claim to the "most military support" is entirely bullsh*t as well.

It's quite possible that the people palehorse deals with are not in favor of Ron Paul. That's all he's saying and I can't see any benefit to him lying about it so I tend to believe him.

 

[BoberFett]

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: bamacre
I stand by that post.

If you guys want to bash a few naive "Paulbots," fine. But don't be an asshole and bash a guy who has been a shining example of honesty and integrity in a Congress that severely lacks both.

I'm not bashing Paul himself, just his Paulbots. They're the most fucking annoying creatures on the Internet these days.

You do not win over voters with the kind of tactics used.

Paul has a lot of things I agree with. He's a staunch Conservative, on both sides (social and fiscal), which really appeals to me. But his extreme views and ideas on everything from monetary policy to foreign intervention (or lack of)...I just don't agree with him.

I'll ask you again. Provide some hard facts to back up the claim that Paul has received the most donations from service members. If you can't, then quit spouting it.

Yes, the Paulbots are annoying. Never mind the Bushbots or Hillarybots or McCainbots or other annoying fanboys. It's just the Paulbots that are annoying. :roll:

Pabsterbot, you are personally a bigger troll and more annoying than any Paul supporter I've met. What does that say about your candidate?

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: BoberFett
Pabsterbot, you are personally a bigger troll and more annoying than any Paul supporter I've met. What does that say about your candidate?

Typical, expected Paulbot response. :roll:

"My" candidate actually manages over 4% ... on the Internet, and in the real world.

 

[BoberFett]

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: BoberFett
Pabsterbot, you are personally a bigger troll and more annoying than any Paul supporter I've met. What does that say about your candidate?

Typical, expected Paulbot response. :roll:

"My" candidate actually manages over 4% ... on the Internet, and in the real world.

Typical, expected Pabsterbot response. :roll:

15% in MN
17% and beat McCain in AK
21% and beat Huckabee in ND
19% and beat Huckabee in ME
14% and beat McCain and Huckabee in NV

Yeah, nobody votes for Paul. :roll:

 

[jonks]

Originally posted by: BoberFett

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: BoberFett
Pabsterbot, you are personally a bigger troll and more annoying than any Paul supporter I've met. What does that say about your candidate?

Typical, expected Paulbot response. :roll:

"My" candidate actually manages over 4% ... on the Internet, and in the real world.

Typical, expected Pabsterbot response. :roll:

15% in MN
17% and beat McCain in AK
21% and beat Huckabee in ND
19% and beat Huckabee in ME
14% and beat McCain and Huckabee in NV

Yeah, nobody votes for Paul. :roll:

Um, those are caucuses, and thus not indicators of individual votes. Look at the primaries to see his real percentages. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/20...esults/candidates/#302

Range was 3-8% (NH was the only 8%) and majority was 4-5%. His highest finish in any primary was 3rd (UT, his only 3rd place finish) and he finished 4th or 5th in the rest of them. In English, because numbers can seem optimistic, if 100 people lined up, in most states 4 or 5 people of the hundred voted for Paul.