Ron Paul leading in MN!!!

[CallMeJoe]

With 0% of the precincts reporting, CNN's web page shows Ron Paul leading with 50% of the vote...


Why don't they spare us reports generated from 0% information?

edit: subtitle

 

[Pabster]

Ron WHO? :laugh:

 

[techs]

Originally posted by: Pabster
Ron WHO? :laugh:

Ron Obama?

 

[miketheidiot]

epic thread.

 

[Whoozyerdaddy]

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe
With 0% of the precincts reporting, CNN's web page shows Ron Paul leading with 50% of the vote...


Why don't they spare us reports generated from 0% information?

edit: subtitle

I guess you could pick a real news site like... ohhhh... FOX, where they are showing zeros down the board in MN. :laugh:

 

[CallMeJoe]

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
I guess you could pick a real news site like... ohhhh... FOX, where they are showing zeros down the board in MN. :laugh:

But I can find stories generated from 0% information every day on Fox News.

 

[Sinsear]

Better check those stats again...

 

[CallMeJoe]

Originally posted by: Sinsear
Better check those stats again...

No problemo! I'm pretty sure Ron Paul still has at least 50% of 0% of the Minnesota total.

 

[Sinsear]

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: Sinsear
Better check those stats again...

No problemo! I'm pretty sure Ron Paul still has at least 50% of 0% of the Minnesota total.

Actually its at 1% and he is in 3rd.

 

[Whoozyerdaddy]

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
I guess you could pick a real news site like... ohhhh... FOX, where they are showing zeros down the board in MN. :laugh:

But I can find stories generated from 0% information every day on Fox News.

Guess they missed RP's epic victory in MN this time...



This time...

 

[CallMeJoe]

Originally posted by: Sinsear

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: Sinsear
Better check those stats again...

No problemo! I'm pretty sure Ron Paul still has at least 50% of 0% of the Minnesota total.

Actually its at 1% and he is in 3rd.

Methinks you need to recalibrate that sarcasm meter pronto!

 

[BrownTown]

Originally posted by: Sinsear

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: Sinsear
Better check those stats again...

No problemo! I'm pretty sure Ron Paul still has at least 50% of 0% of the Minnesota total.

Actually its at 1% and he is in 3rd.

You do realize he was making a statement about the stupidity of basing statistics off of 0% of the vote and not in support of Paul right? All that was showing was that the computer program that does the rankings just randomly pulled Ron Paul out its ass when it should have not made any prediction. Basically the computer programmer made a mistake is all.

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: Sinsear

Actually its at 1% and he is in 3rd.

At 2% counted, he's still leading Giuliani, but that's about it. :laugh:

 

[FoBoT]

you paulbots can just figure 3-4% , no need to stay up past your bedtime

 

[bamacre]

Thread after thread, people complaining about Hillary and McCain, as they wrap up their nominations. And here you guys are celebrating the predicted defeat of Paul. Irony at its best.

 

[Harvey]

On refreshing my screen, Giuliani's closing on Paul. Giuliani still has votes, but he's gained three points on Paul. I think Paul's lead over Giuliani will hold, but it'll probably be close. :laugh:

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: FoBoT
you paulbots can just figure 3-4% , no need to stay up past your bedtime

:laugh: :thumbsup: :laugh:

 

[techs]

Clearly one of the biggest obstacles to Ron Paul being elected or even breaking into double digits has been the actions of his supporters.

 

[nageov3t]

hey, he's gotten 1700 votes in Mass so far today, compared to 0 yesterday. another couple months like this and he might win a state

 

[compuwiz1]

Originally posted by: Pabster
Ron WHO? :laugh:

Ron Perot :laugh:

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: techs
Clearly one of the biggest obstacles to Ron Paul being elected or even breaking into double digits has been the actions of his supporters.

And you can bet that Hillary's highway to her nomination has been led by the stupidity of her supporters.

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: bamacre

And you can bet that Hillary's highway to her nomination has been led by the stupidity of her supporters.

You can say that with a straight face after the disaterous Presidency of your Traitor in Chief? :roll:

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: bamacre

And you can bet that Hillary's highway to her nomination has been led by the stupidity of her supporters.

You can say that with a straight face after the disaterous Presidency of your Traitor in Chief? :roll:

"Your?"

Just wtf are you assuming here?

I never voted for that douchebag.

 

[CallMeJoe]

Breaking news! With 1% of the precincts reporting, CNN shows Romney leading with 13% of the vote...

Where the hell do they get these numbers?

edit: Huckabee in 2d place with 3%!!! Just how many candidates are there in Utah?

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: bamacre

And you can bet that Hillary's highway to her nomination has been led by the stupidity of her supporters.

You can say that with a straight face after the disaterous Presidency of your Traitor in Chief? :roll:

"Your?"

Just wtf are you assuming here?

I never voted for that douchebag.

I know he isn't mine. Glad we agree, but you've just insulted all the douchebags in the world by including Bushie with them.