Originally posted by: Abraxas
Christ you are stupid.
Wrong. I've already discussed repeatedly many other areas of government that are not in danger from the LP.
Of course they aren't in danger from the LP, nobody cares about the LP.
And keep in mind that the entire idea of a Libertarian party is an oxymoron in itself. It's not exactly a cohesive bunch. And it's not like there aren't some serious kooks in the Republican and Democratic party, including yourself obviously, so bringing up the positions of extremists as representing the mainstream is more than a tad dishonest (which is all you've been this whole thread).
LOL I've already pointed out roughly a half dozen lies you've been called on and you call anyone else dishonest? What happened to you ignoring me Vic? Oh wait, just one more lie because your ego is too large to let you admit you have been beaten.
Since you think you've got me pegged, which party, if any, am I Vic?
Oh, and for the record, I explicitly noted the parts of the LP that were extremist and separated them from the mainstream LP beliefs. Another lie you got caught in, for shame.
Wrong. Do you really believe that Wal-Mart wants to pay to use every single road involved in shipping its goods here there and everywhere? When they already get the public to pay for that for them? Do you think they want to do away with public education and thus have to deal with a labor pool that can't even read and write... at all?
Wal-Mart wouldn't have to pay for them. Another strawman from you, there's a shocker. There would be companies that will purchase roadways and charge a toll on them and make money that way.
Further, more bad logic, no public schools would not imply no schooling at all, nor that people could not read and write. Despite the difficulties you seem to be having with English, many of us, myself included, were doing some reading and writing before learning about it in school. You would see either a rise in private schooling, which is what some of the more extreme Libertarians want, as well as homeschooling.
Wrong. I don't have a "hardon for big business," Abraxas, and you're the one who brought them up. I'm not defending big business, that is yet another straw man of yours. I am attacking your ridiculous notions.
No, you brought them up in your post immediately prior to the one I am quoting despite nobody mentioning them in any of the posts you quoted. This makes, what, eight lies you've been caught in? If you don't have a hardon for big business, stop bringing them up in every post, even when nobody is talking about them.
Wrong. Privately-owned roads and schools are only profitable on an exception basis. It would be silly to have to pay a toll for each and every road, nd would slow commerce to unprofitable levels.
There are other ways. They could sell travel plans and so forth, a week long, a month long, or a year long pass to use their roads. Doing so would speed up travel to levels near what they are now.
a Likewise, an uneducated workforce is unprofitable, even at the lowest skill levels.
Addressed above, private and home schooling. The former is profitable as no parent would be content to refuse to educate their child and so they would work to send them to one, or home schooling, which costs the companies nothing. Again, I will note, as I explicitly said in the post, the roadways and education privatization are only held by some extreme libertarians to be the correct course of action.
Ah what lovely circular logic. You're right because you're right and you don't have to prove it because you can't. Amazing. You are truly a moron/troll at the dmcowen674 level. A remarkable achievement for which you are to be commended.
Do you even know what circular logic is?
Again, since you are the densest substance known to man, I will repeat myself and hopefully this time it will sink in.
1. Ron Paul does not accept corporate donations so Big Business cannot donate to him anyway, making your idiotic objection of "ZOMG WHY WONT BUG BUSNIZ DONAT TO HIM!!!11!" moot. They can't because he won't take it.
2. Ron Paul already has money, the third most of any Republican candidate, and it isn't doing him any good. He has yet to crack the margin of error in any national poll so clearly the money isn't helping him. Thus, if money isn't helping him, giving money to him is a waste of money.
Honestly Vic, at this point you are an exposed troll and a fool. You claiming something so linear as "Big business doesn't donate to Ron Paul because he won't take their money and money doesn't help him get elected anyway" as being circular logic only proves you are an unarmed man in a battle of wits. It is patently obvious that the conclusion "Ron Paul does not get corporate donations" does not presuppose either premise, "Ron Paul does not accept corporate donations" and "Ron Paul has money but still has no support" and so it cannot be circular logic.
Do yourself a favor and stop taking debate pointers from Zendari.