• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Romney ahead and gaining among women

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
spidey07 said:
2010 is calling, guess you didn't learn from that and the historic sweep at the state, local and federal level. Americans are downright pissed off at this president and democrats. Anger is one of the most powerful emotions, it motivates one to act.

See you in November, it's almost here.
Click to expand...

2010, when only 40% of eligible Americans voted.... Righties were revved up by "Death Panels" & Ending Medicare" while Libs were underwhelmed by lack of progress, buying into the notion of do-nothing Dems rather than obstructionist Repubs...

I don't think there's much of a mandate from 21% of eligible voters, and I don't think Libs will be staying home, at all. It's not like Teahadists are really wild about Mitt, either, let alone women...

Barring some incredible twist of fate, I figure you'll be singing the blues rsn...
 
spidey07 said:
What the fuck is wrong with you people!!!!!!

Can you not read!!!!!
Click to expand...

Sure we can-

For all of the good news for Republicans, however, what matters most in the election endgame is Romney's standing in the handful of states whose electoral votes still are up for grabs. And polls in a number of those battleground states still appear to favor Obama.
Click to expand...

From your link, of course...

Have you considered the possibility that the one poll giving you such hope is an outlier?

Probably not...
 
spidey07 said:
As the polls indicate, they remember obama's economic disaster much more and prefer Romney on that front. This is all about the economy as much as Democrats and Obama try to distract from that. Women care if their husbands or they can put food on the table and gas in the car above all else, security comes first.
Click to expand...

You don't give women nor the general population enough credit. We remember what has happened since 2009. We remember how the GOP filibustered damn near everything they could while proposing nothing of their own. We also remember what happened BEFORE 2009. Women DO care about the economy as well as their reproductive freedoms. A vote for the GOP is a vote against both of those interests. See you in November. We thinking Americans will be out in droves again to keep your brand of crazy in check.
 
MovingTarget said:
You don't give women nor the general population enough credit. We remember what has happened since 2009. We remember how the GOP filibustered damn near everything they could while proposing nothing of their own. We also remember what happened BEFORE 2009. Women DO care about the economy as well as their reproductive freedoms. A vote for the GOP is a vote against both of those interests. See you in November. We thinking Americans will be out in droves again to keep your brand of crazy in check.
Click to expand...

I think you have the rhetoric wrong their. It is not about reproduction, it is about making choices about their body (unless the fetus is too far along and then it is okay to force them to be a slave).

Also not that married women favor Republicans. Only women who do not have A man of their own vote for Democrats so they can have THE man take care of them.
 
nehalem256 said:
I think you have the rhetoric wrong their. It is not about reproduction, it is about making choices about their body (unless the fetus is too far along and then it is okay to force them to be a slave).

Also not that married women favor Republicans. Only women who do not have A man of their own vote for Democrats so they can have THE man take care of them.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you can't figure out why you're single & un-laid, either..
 
MovingTarget said:
You don't give women nor the general population enough credit. We remember what has happened since 2009. We remember how the GOP filibustered damn near everything they could while proposing nothing of their own. We also remember what happened BEFORE 2009. Women DO care about the economy as well as their reproductive freedoms. A vote for the GOP is a vote against both of those interests. See you in November. We thinking Americans will be out in droves again to keep your brand of crazy in check.
Click to expand...

The moment that read your post, I wondered how long it would take for our local misogynist to show up with his usual one note speel. Sure enough, couple of posts later! Dude, is this like your mutant superpower to smell any possible men's-right slight from miles away like a friggin vulture? Pretty lame superpower if you ask me 😛
 
GarfieldtheCat said:
Hmm...funny our #1 troll forgets this part of the article:

So Obama is gaining with men, just as Romney is gaining with women.
Click to expand...

Wow, your lies are getting more and more transparent. Can you show where the article says what you claimed? Give it a shot, unless you are too much of a coward to do it. Speaking of your cowardice, have you gained the courage to write Hans Blix yet, or still quaking in fear of it?
 
Phokus said:
Cybrsage is too stupid to realize that the presidency is won on electoral votes
Click to expand...

Phokus, phokus, phokus...you never fail to fail - in fact, failing is the one thing you usually succeed at (which must be why you keep doing it - playing to your main strength).

How do you obtain these electoral votes? Do you get them by people voting for you?




As an aside, I edited you post to remove the misspell of my handle. Just correcting another of your fails for you.
 
cybrsage said:
Wow, your lies are getting more and more transparent. Can you show where the article says what you claimed? Give it a shot, unless you are too much of a coward to do it. Speaking of your cowardice, have you gained the courage to write Hans Blix yet, or still quaking in fear of it?
Click to expand...

Guess reading English is too hard for our little troll?

You didn't see the quote I posted? Too hard for you, LOL?

The article pointed out that each side was gaining in the others demographic. But of course, as our #1 troll here, you "forgot" Obama's gain, and only mentioned Romney's gain.

You will of course ignore this as well, since you can't refute it, despite the fact that it is pointed out in the very article your posted, LOL. Maybe you want to post some pretty maps again, so you can get another vacation for trolling?
 
GarfieldtheCat said:
Guess reading English is too hard for our little troll?

You didn't see the quote I posted? Too hard for you, LOL?

The article pointed out that each side was gaining in the others demographic. But of course, as our #1 troll here, you "forgot" Obama's gain, and only mentioned Romney's gain.

You will of course ignore this as well, since you can't refute it, despite the fact that it is pointed out in the very article your posted, LOL. Maybe you want to post some pretty maps again, so you can get another vacation for trolling?
Click to expand...

Ah, still stupid as well as a coward. You quote one person's gains being reduced and pretend that means the other is gaining. Let me show you why you fail (as usual) in this assumption:

Bill and Jim are running a foot race. Bill runs 8 mph and Jim runs 5. Bill is in the lead by quite a bit and slows down to only 4 mph. Bill's lead is shrinking. Does this mean Jim is gaining? No, Jim is still at the same speed.

You make the assumption that the lost voters are all running, arms open wide, to Obama. This forum shows that some of them, at least, are instead voting third party.

You could be correct in that Obama is also gaining, but since the article does not claim what you say it claims, you are wrong.
 
cybrsage said:
Ah, still stupid as well as a coward. You quote one person's gains being reduced and pretend that means the other is gaining. Let me show you why you fail (as usual) in this assumption:

Bill and Jim are running a foot race. Bill runs 8 mph and Jim runs 5. Bill is in the lead by quite a bit and slows down to only 4 mph. Bill's lead is shrinking. Does this mean Jim is gaining? No, Jim is still at the same speed.

You make the assumption that the lost voters are all running, arms open wide, to Obama. This forum shows that some of them, at least, are instead voting third party.

You could be correct in that Obama is also gaining, but since the article does not claim what you say it claims, you are wrong.
Click to expand...


Troll on....you'll get another vacation soon enough I bet :thumbsup:

But once again, you show you cherry pick sentences here and there to spin something to mean what it doesn't.

So you, as usual, ignored the whole article. Typical. You wanna post some map pics again ?
 
A month ago, women favored Obama over Romney on the economy 56 percent to 40 percent.
Click to expand...

and why don't they report the numbers regarding how women regard ROmney telling them how to control their bodies, vs Obama?

this has always been a clear and insurmountable gap.

I know this doesn't register with you or any other GOPers because you think girls are "icky" and they would be best served keeping their ickiness away from you and all that; so long as they "ick" the way you tell them to "ick." ...but this actually matters.
 
zinfamous said:
and why don't they report the numbers regarding how women regard ROmney telling them how to control their bodies, vs Obama?

this has always been a clear and insurmountable gap.

I know this doesn't register with you or any other GOPers because you think girls are "icky" and they would be best served keeping their ickiness away from you and all that; so long as they "ick" the way you tell them to "ick." ...but this actually matters.
Click to expand...

Why don't you just grow some balls and say abortion?

Although you raise an interesting point. I guess we will learn what women think is more important. The economy, or their ability to abort fetuses :hmm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top