Roman Polanski arrested in Switzerland at U.S. request

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Polanski's confession-it's part of the record.
Can you substantiate this claim? Best I can tell, the only one's claiming anything beyond oral sex are simply those ignorant of the legal definition of sodomy.
 

DucatiMonster696

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2009
4,269
1
71
Originally posted by: kylebisme
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Polanski's confession-it's part of the record.
Can you substantiate this claim? Best I can tell, the only one's claiming anything beyond oral sex are simply those ignorant of the legal definition of sodomy.

He copped a plea so there was no trail. In essence he agreed he was guilty of rape but was hoping to get a lesser sentence with no jail time. Of course the judge decided this was not going to be the case near the end of the case and changed the deal. That is when he fled.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/a...ve/polanskicover1.html
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Just imagine if this was a Republican Senator who had been caught doing this. People would be screaming death penalty.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,861
6,396
126
It seems to me that if the Judge decided to Sentence differently after agreeing to a Guilty Verdict/Deal, then the "Guilty" is no longer valid. Meaning that the Case should be Retried at the very least.
 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Just imagine if this was a Republican Senator who had been caught doing this. People would be screaming death penalty.

As if Republican senators would go for 13 year old girls.

Well, Cantor might.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Just imagine if this was a Republican Senator who had been caught doing this. People would be screaming death penalty.

Look at it this way; if it was you caught doing this, everyone would be screaming death penalty.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Sounds like a media stunt more than anything else. I doubt the guy will serve more than 30 days in a country club prison, but he'll definitely be in every newspaper in the country because of this.

Does he have a new movie coming out or something?
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Sounds like a media stunt more than anything else. I doubt the guy will serve more than 30 days in a country club prison, but he'll definitely be in every newspaper in the country because of this.

Does he have a new movie coming out or something?

yeah..he decided to get caught so he can promote a movie...thats just idiotic even from you.


 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Sounds like a media stunt more than anything else. I doubt the guy will serve more than 30 days in a country club prison, but he'll definitely be in every newspaper in the country because of this.

Does he have a new movie coming out or something?

yeah..he decided to get caught so he can promote a movie...thats just idiotic even from you.
Well, at least after he serves out his 30 days in country club prison, he can make his return to Hollywood.
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Sounds like a media stunt more than anything else. I doubt the guy will serve more than 30 days in a country club prison, but he'll definitely be in every newspaper in the country because of this.

Does he have a new movie coming out or something?

I think they'd sentence him to a lot more than that. Just the charge of becoming a fugitive from justice after a felony conviction is likely to be a few years in prison. And that doesn't even address the amended sentence for the sex offense. I think he'd be lucky to get off with less than five years.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,861
6,396
126
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Sounds like a media stunt more than anything else. I doubt the guy will serve more than 30 days in a country club prison, but he'll definitely be in every newspaper in the country because of this.

Does he have a new movie coming out or something?

yeah..he decided to get caught so he can promote a movie...thats just idiotic even from you.

That wouldn't shock me at all. There is no Bad Publicity when it comes to various Art Forms.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: kylebisme
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Polanski's confession-it's part of the record.
Can you substantiate this claim? Best I can tell, the only one's claiming anything beyond oral sex are simply those ignorant of the legal definition of sodomy.
Go find it yourself. He performed oral sex on her, he screwed her vaginally and he screwed her anally. It's part of the testimony.

 

marincounty

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,227
5
76
I wish the Swiss and US govts would show the same kind of effort to bust all of the tax cheats using Swiss banks that they do busting a fugitive over a 30 year old rape case.
 

Athena

Golden Member
Apr 9, 2001
1,484
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
How is there a crime if there is no victim. Who are you to re-victimize a victim if a victim has somehow forgiven or does not want to be dragged back into the situation.
Think about what you are saying here. Suppose someone admits to murdering your father then runs away. Are you saying that there is no victim because...the victim died a long time ago or that no one should prosecute if you've been born again and forgiven him? Is a bankrobber no longer a criminal if the bank he robbed has shut down?

Phillip Garridos kidnapped 11-year old Jaycee Dugard fathered children by her and kept them living in tents. She is now 28 and made no attempt to escape. Are you suggesting that whether or not he should be prosecuted is up to her and not society?

Garridos and Planski are both criminals...and the criminal justice system will deal with them

You would make a rapist out of underage lovers because the law is the law is the law. The law is an attempt to formalize what we think is just but it is never exact.
I'm not sure where you are going with this but California law does not (and did not in 1977) recognize the ability of a 13 year old girl to consent to sex with anyone. The current laws about unlawful sexual intercourse do provide for a lesser misdemeanor charge in cases involving two juveniles (between 14 and 18) but there is no such thing as consensual sex between a 13 year old and anyone.

The Polanski of 31 years ago is dead. We have captured a different person.
What is the rational of punishing him?
It's up to his lawyers to pose those questions to to the court in Los Angeles. I suppose they could look for precedent in the many, many cases involving Nazi war criminals -- some of whom have been prosecuted in their 90s. I doubt though that they will find much to help his cause there.

The only one I can find is the notion that a society must make it known that they will stop punish even the well placed if they harm others.
It's hardly the only reason but I'll happily settle for that if you can't see any other.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: marincounty
I wish the Swiss and US govts would show the same kind of effort to bust all of the tax cheats using Swiss banks that they do busting a fugitive over a 30 year old rape case.

They have. They signed a new tax treaty just last week in fact.
 

marincounty

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,227
5
76
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: marincounty
I wish the Swiss and US govts would show the same kind of effort to bust all of the tax cheats using Swiss banks that they do busting a fugitive over a 30 year old rape case.

They have. They signed a new tax treaty just last week in fact.

They are only going to release a limited number of names of suspected tax cheats to the US govt, not all of them. And it has taken years to get any cooperation from Switzerland.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: shira
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Sounds like a media stunt more than anything else. I doubt the guy will serve more than 30 days in a country club prison, but he'll definitely be in every newspaper in the country because of this.

Does he have a new movie coming out or something?

I think they'd sentence him to a lot more than that. Just the charge of becoming a fugitive from justice after a felony conviction is likely to be a few years in prison. And that doesn't even address the amended sentence for the sex offense. I think he'd be lucky to get off with less than five years.
Nah. This is Hollywood. He'll be back in action before the Oscars.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
This seems like a poor use of resources for these reasons:

- The victim does not want this pursued
- He served 42 days which is the original sentence the defense and prosecution agreed on
- The lack of any further such crimes in over 3 decades
- Those factors combined with the time involved, his effective exile from the US and his reputation seems that the resources are better spent elsewhere.
 

Ihey8neocons

Banned
Sep 27, 2009
31
0
0
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: kylebisme
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Polanski's confession-it's part of the record.
Can you substantiate this claim? Best I can tell, the only one's claiming anything beyond oral sex are simply those ignorant of the legal definition of sodomy.
Go find it yourself. He performed oral sex on her, he screwed her vaginally and he screwed her anally. It's part of the testimony.

Gee, that more ways than Bush screwed America.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Oh, and lest we forget this damn case wouldn't be 30 years old if he wasn't a FUGITIVE who refused to face up to justice for those 30 years.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: Craig234
This seems like a poor use of resources for these reasons:

- The victim does not want this pursued

It's not a civil case.

- He served 42 days which is the original sentence the defense and prosecution agreed on

The 42 days were for a psychiatric evaluation. He fled before sentencing. Defense/prosecution agreement isn't the necessary end, too.

- The lack of any further such crimes in over 3 decades

He was a fugitive over the 3 decades. War criminals (especially Nazis) are also pursued after decades of no longer committing similar crimes they are sought for.

- Those factors combined with the time involved, his effective exile from the US and his reputation seems that the resources are better spent elsewhere.

Those last factors seem like exactly why resources should be spent on this.

He needs to face some sort of legal responsibility.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Sounds like a media stunt more than anything else. I doubt the guy will serve more than 30 days in a country club prison, but he'll definitely be in every newspaper in the country because of this.

Does he have a new movie coming out or something?

yeah..he decided to get caught so he can promote a movie...thats just idiotic even from you.

That wouldn't shock me at all. There is no Bad Publicity when it comes to various Art Forms.

it might be a worthwile idea if he has not had many movies out in the last 30 years..

but i do expect he will serve less then a year. At wich point he will be welcomed iwth open arms by the hollywood elite.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,936
6,794
126
Originally posted by: Athena
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
How is there a crime if there is no victim. Who are you to re-victimize a victim if a victim has somehow forgiven or does not want to be dragged back into the situation.
Think about what you are saying here. Suppose someone admits to murdering your father then runs away. Are you saying that there is no victim because...the victim died a long time ago or that no one should prosecute if you've been born again and forgiven him? Is a bankrobber no longer a criminal if the bank he robbed has shut down?

Phillip Garridos kidnapped 11-year old Jaycee Dugard fathered children by her and kept them living in tents. She is now 28 and made no attempt to escape. Are you suggesting that whether or not he should be prosecuted is up to her and not society?

Garridos and Planski are both criminals...and the criminal justice system will deal with them

You would make a rapist out of underage lovers because the law is the law is the law. The law is an attempt to formalize what we think is just but it is never exact.
I'm not sure where you are going with this but California law does not (and did not in 1977) recognize the ability of a 13 year old girl to consent to sex with anyone. The current laws about unlawful sexual intercourse do provide for a lesser misdemeanor charge in cases involving two juveniles (between 14 and 18) but there is no such thing as consensual sex between a 13 year old and anyone.

The Polanski of 31 years ago is dead. We have captured a different person.
What is the rational of punishing him?
It's up to his lawyers to pose those questions to to the court in Los Angeles. I suppose they could look for precedent in the many, many cases involving Nazi war criminals -- some of whom have been prosecuted in their 90s. I doubt though that they will find much to help his cause there.

The only one I can find is the notion that a society must make it known that they will stop punish even the well placed if they harm others.
It's hardly the only reason but I'll happily settle for that if you can't see any other.

I tried to clarify those points I made above as follows and once again:

{1. Not trying to equate them, only pointing out to you that your law is the law argument will put you on the side that treated underage lovers exactly like you want to treat Polanski. The law is the law so the two have to be treated equally.

2. Law looks more just to me when there is a victim seeking redress then when there is not. It still must seek redress, however, for the reasons you stated.

3. Swift justice is better than justice delayed. One virtue of justice delayed is that perhaps it discomforts those yet to be tried.

Again, why this piece of shit thought it was a good idea to rape that young girl is any bodies guess, beyond the obvious hate it shows for another human being. I don't think as a society we can except him for it because he is artistic, famous, and much time has passed. Those things just make the application of justice less clear cut, in my opinion. I still think it was right, in the long run, to grab him if they could. Just my opinion is all.}

So to your first point I prefer justice that is met out where there is a victim that wants it to be rather than to somebody the do not wish it to be. Such justice has less ambiguity and collateral cost in my opinion. It looks like all this is going to screw that girl, now a woman, all over again. We must have our pound of flesh.

To your second point, again, swift justice is better than justice delayed, but late is better than never.

To your last point, it is not the only reason but the only one suggested by alchemize with which I broadly agree.
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Can it ever be the case that someone's expected future value to society is so great that we should pardon them for having committed a serious crime?

Edit: I'm not necessarily saying that Polanski qualifies.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: shira
Can it ever be the case that someone's expected future value to society is so great that we should pardon them for having committed a serious crime?

Edit: I'm not necessarily saying that Polanski qualifies.
I agree with that. That's what pardons are for.