Originally posted by: dakata24
if he's in his prime. how would he compare to pete sampras (in his prime)?
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
He already has 7 Grand Slam titles and he's only 24.
Originally posted by: Furyline
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
He already has 7 Grand Slam titles and he's only 24.
Sampras did this, too. He's definitely the best, most dominant player since pete, if he keeps it up he could be the best ever. Winning the French this year would really put him up there, 4 straight grand slams doesn't happen too often.
I hope we can keep seeing new younger players challenging him, I'm getting sick of Roddick being embarrassed every time they play. Baghdatis sure was fun to watch, he had a great run there. After the first set and a half, I thought he was going to do it. But, yeah, Federer turned into a monster.
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Originally posted by: dakata24
if he's in his prime. how would he compare to pete sampras (in his prime)?
I think Federer would beat Sampras in 3 or 4 sets. Sampras had a great service game, but I doubt he could compete with Federer on ground strokes.
Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Originally posted by: dakata24
if he's in his prime. how would he compare to pete sampras (in his prime)?
I think Federer would beat Sampras in 3 or 4 sets. Sampras had a great service game, but I doubt he could compete with Federer on ground strokes.
I'm sure Sampras has beaten a few ground stroke power players in his time.![]()
Originally posted by: HamSupLo
sampras will destroy fedor with his serve and volley game.
has roddick found his mojo yet?
Originally posted by: HamSupLo
sampras will destroy fedor with his serve and volley game.
has roddick found his mojo yet?