Roger Ebert dead at 70.

[gorcorps]

yet he has vast knowledge on film that you will never come close to comprehending, and though you lambast him for poking fun at your video games, you declare all of his criticism to be null and void?

cute.

Exactly

It doesn't make any sense for me to form an opinion on such things because I have no idea how being a professional critic works, nor do I have any knowledge in the subject. But why should that stop me from making up some bullshit about it anyway... right? :whiste:

 

[boomerang]

I'm guessing you actually hate him because of what he said about that whore, Palin and the throngs of mindless Teabaggers?

You know what they say about making assumptions. 😀

I need to reread my post to see where I said I hated him. Back in a flash.

 

[khel]

r.i.p

 

[zinfamous]

You know what they say about making assumptions. 😀

which is why I responded to your woefully uninformed assumptions about his character

I need to reread my post to see where I said I hated him. Back in a flash.

that's an awful lot of loving invective you have hurled at a man whom you claim not to hate. :hmm:

 

[JimKiler]

From this link, its the movie North

http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2012/06/the-50-harshest-roger-ebert-movie-review-quotes/north

There it is, his review of The Village:

"To call it an anticlimax would be an insult not only to climaxes but to prefixes. It's a crummy secret, about one step up the ladder of narrative originality from It Was All a Dream. It's so witless, in fact, that when we do discover the secret, we want to rewind the film so we don't know the secret anymore. And then keep on rewinding, and rewinding, until we're back at the beginning, and can get up from our seats and walk backward out of the theater and go down the up escalator and watch the money spring from the cash register into our pockets." — Roger Ebert

thanks for the link!