Flipped Gazelle
Diamond Member
Originally posted by: Deeko
Yea sure, he's a good guy. That doesn't mean he was an interesting broadcaster. Locals always fall in love with their local sports announcers, even if they aren't REALLY that good. Such as the old Steelers announcer, Cope, or the Eagles' radio announcer, Reese. I can't stand either of them, they have the most obnoxious voices on radio, but the respective locals love them.
You make a good point about Cope & Reese, but I don't think it applies to Harry Kalas. He had his own style, didn't talk too much, had a great voice. He wasn't your stereotypical "homer" kind of announcer. Much like baseball itself, his was a rhythm you gently slipped into, and floated upon through the course of the game.
BTW, I'm a Mets fan. (They just lost the opener of their new ballpark. Figures!)
Contrast Kalas with someone like John Sterling, who broadcasts for the Yankees. That guy's a buffoon - even many Yankees fan think so.
As a Mets fan, I've had the good fortune of listening to some awesome radio broadcasters over the years. Gary Thorne, Gary Cohen and Tom MCarthy (heh, Phillies now). Good voices and nuts-n-bolts kind of guys, although at times a little bit sterile. Long time Mets announcer Bob Murphy was wonderful, a bit of a homer but not too bad, with a great old-time, homespun personality in the booth.
Voice of God (as it pertains to sports) - John Facenda & Bob Sheppard.
Originally posted by: Perknose
He had the love and respect of his audience. If "locals always fall in love with their local sports announcers" as you say, then WHY in the 60 years of WS broadcasts prior to 1980 did NO group of local fans protest and petition MLB to have their locals also be allowed to broadcast the game?
In all fairness, how do you know there weren't protests and petitions prior to the Phillies phans? Maybe previous efforts just weren't successful.