SMOGZINN
Lifer
Originally posted by: DrPizza
So, you think every case should be tried in a court of law instead? Isn't that what's already happening & people are complaining that it takes up too much of the court's time?
And, isn't that what's already happening and people are complaining that innocent people have to pay exorbitant costs to defend themselves in court?
I have no sympathy for anyone that breaks the law and has to go before a court to defend themselves. But RIAA to often uses the courts as a blunt instrument to randomly sue people, either from their own incompetence, bad discovery practices, or a planned campaign of legal terrorism. That is what I am aginst. Sue people that are infringing your IPs, but have the evidence to back up your claims, and do not require that I lose my rights to make it easier for you to do so.
Or, do you think the record companies should just say "screw it. We're not going to protect our property. Pirate all you want."
Personally, I think the recording companies should face the facts and accept that their business model is no longer viable and look for a new business to get into.
It's not as if the moment the ISP gets a letter from the RIAA that they're going to knock you offline. You have time to respond. Probably 999 times out of 1000, the person is going to actually be sharing songs online. And, that 1 time out of 1000, the person gets plenty of time to dispute it.
Well, this is just what we are afraid of. That RIAA will demand that they be taken at their word with no proof, and not questioned. RIAA has a history of using deals like this as a hammer to attack anyone that disagrees with them. RIAA has not so far proven they are a good steward of our faith.
So, why are you really opposed to this?
I'm opposed to this because it opens up a can of worms I would rather not see opened.
Should any one be able to write a letter to any ISP demanding that someone be denied access to the internet because of an unsubstantiated claim that a (civil) law is being broken? That seems to be your argument.
Would you be in favor of ISP's blocking people who are uploading and downloading child pornography? Yeah?
No, I would not. That is for the courts to decide, not some random tech guy at a company.