- Oct 24, 2000
- 29,767
- 33
- 81
Originally posted by: crabbyman
I will reply to your thread. I am really interested as how this compares to the 10D. I am wondering if there are differences to grant the $600 difference. To me...that puts me that much closer to getting my first digital SLR. I will be buying one in a heartbeat if Dell or Apple *places I have accounts through* carry these. Anyone want to list the differences for me?![]()
Originally posted by: sotong
The review has already pointed out the differences so I won't bother but one issue that may not be of importance to many people but of concern to me is the country of manufacture. The EOS 10D is made in japan while the eos 300d will likely be made in taiwan. I would still very much prefer a made in japan model
In addition to this the EOS 300D is the first Canon digital SLR to support a new lens called the EF-S (S = short back focus), this has the same mount and electrical contacts as an EF lens but has a rear element which fits further into the camera allowing it to be closer to the image sensor. The lens elements can also be reduced in size as the imaging circle does not need to be as large, thus EF-S lenses should be smaller and lighter than their 35 mm equivalents. Note that EF-S lenses can only be used on the EOS 300D (so far) as no other EOS camera supports the EF-S mount.
Originally posted by: WebDude
I've been looking at the 10D for months, but it's just too expensive for me. The 300D is getting to the point where I can afford it. Especially when you can get it with a good lens for $1000.
One difference I find worth noting is the ability of the 300D to accept the new Canon EF-S lenses, something the 10D can't. Don't know where things are headed in the Canon digital EOS world, but this seems like it would be a feature worth having.
In addition to this the EOS 300D is the first Canon digital SLR to support a new lens called the EF-S (S = short back focus), this has the same mount and electrical contacts as an EF lens but has a rear element which fits further into the camera allowing it to be closer to the image sensor. The lens elements can also be reduced in size as the imaging circle does not need to be as large, thus EF-S lenses should be smaller and lighter than their 35 mm equivalents. Note that EF-S lenses can only be used on the EOS 300D (so far) as no other EOS camera supports the EF-S mount.