Rethink 9/11 billboard in Times Square

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Coming from someone who claims MIT-level engineering aptitude that is an extraordinarily unscientific statement. How big a site? What size jets? Moving how fast? How much energy was transferred?

At least you ought to realize that the "whole site" wasn't brought down by the jets. The jets destabilized two structures that held up 3 million tons of mass.

Someone who claims such engineering aptitude ought to have more respect for the work of other engineers, some ability to speak precisely about the forces at work, and at least a modicum of appreciation for the energy released when those two structures failed.

Watch this:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b2c_1410464671

Watch it not just because it is 30 minutes of extraordinary footage, but because it clearly illustrates the scope of the disaster, and the damage caused to nearby structures when 3 million tons of suspended mass is allowed to drop to the ground.

Seeing how he lists his "credentials" it reminds me of Troy McClure from The Simpsons. It's really sad. Anyway, anyone who lives in that area then (and now) can tell you that it's really cavernous below ground. You had the A, C, E, R, and Path trains running underneath. Then you had other things going under there. So when the two towers came down the foundation in that area was weakened as well. I'm not an engineer but I just lived and worked in the area most of my life...
 
Last edited: