While I won't say that's bad advice in general, it doesn't actually fit the OP's original post. Her video card is a GTX 1060. ANY of the CPU's suggested would work just great, as she will be GPU bound regardless.i completely agree that you should always wait for reviews before getting a product and never blind buy.
That being said, you should wait for the 9000 series launch.
Core per Core clock Intel has a greater advantage then AMD.
Dollar to performance margin, is where AMD has a greater advantage then Intel.
Then when you get to thread ripper, you get a bigger advantage with core count to dollar.
But again that being said, if you want the fastest core right now, its definitely the 8086k.
The 9000 series however im willing to speculate that they will either be close to the same, or a bit greater.
The 9000 series also if rumor goes welll, will also be soldered so it will be a lot easier to get that 5ghz+ overclock on a mid tier heat sink.
Hence why if you want the fastest core speed, wait for the 9000 series to launch, then read the reviews, and then make your choice then.
Is a she.While I won't say that's bad advice in general, it doesn't actually fit the OP's original post. His video card is a GTX 1060. ANY of the CPU's suggested would work just great, as he will be GPU bound regardless.
With the improved multithreaded performance patch apparently in the works I'm now leaning towards a 2600x. >.>
CPUs now are running default at over 4.2GHz under full load, and they OC to around 5GHz with very high voltage,
If all you need is fast ST performance on a budget, I would actually recommend a used 6600K / Z170 motherboard, overclock it to ~4.7GHz and you're basically at the same IPC/clocks as more modern, higher core/thread count CPUs such as the 8600K/8700K for a small fraction of the price.
It should be noted that, depending on which CPU you are talking about (7700k, 8700k, etc) that 4.6-4.8 GHz can be obtained with significantly lower voltage than the 5-5.3 GHz halo overclocks.
I haven't looked at 6600ks recently. But after what I saw people achieving with the 7700k and 8700k, I would look with some skepticism at Skylake since it is actually a bit harder to hit 4.8 GHz with those chips than it is with even Kabylake. The voltage/clockspeed curves are just not as good on the 6600k or 6700k. 6700k prices do appear to be more reasonable than 7700k prices, though.
That looks like a great deal with the MIR. Nice motherboard and more saved $$$ to go towards other components.How is this?
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Comb...ndex-_-Combo-_-Combo3871830-S3A6A&ignorebbr=1
$209.98 AR.