Republicans Vote To Repeal Obama-Backed Bill That Would Destroy Asteroid Headed For E

Dankk

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2008
5,558
25
91
It's refreshing to see every single one of our house republicans taking action against this nonsense. I say good riddance to the Obamastroid bill. Why? It's an unconstitutional abuse of the government's police power to destroy asteroids and would have only added to our massive debt. The private sector is much better equipped to handle the destruction of asteroids, without costing the taxpayers a dime.

Full article here.

WASHINGTON—In a strong rebuke of President Obama and his domestic agenda, all 242 House Republicans voted Wednesday to repeal the Asteroid Destruction and American Preservation Act, which was signed into law last year to destroy the immense asteroid currently hurtling toward Earth.

The $440 billion legislation, which would send a dozen high-thrust plasma impactor probes to shatter the massive asteroid before it strikes the planet, would affect more than 300 million Americans and is strongly opposed by the GOP.

"The voters sent us to Washington to stand up for individual liberty, not big government," Rep. Steve King (R-IA) said at a press conference. "Obama's plan would take away citizens' fundamental freedoms, forcing each of us into hastily built concrete bunkers and empowering the federal government to ration our access to food, water, and potassium iodide tablets while underground."
 

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
It's refreshing to see every single one of our house republicans taking action against this nonsense. I say good riddance to the Obamastroid bill. Why? It's an unconstitutional abuse of the government's police power to destroy asteroids and would have only added to our massive debt. The private sector is much better equipped to handle the destruction of asteroids, without costing the taxpayers a dime.

Full article here.

Unfortunately, the premise is believable.

Only difference is that it would be the EPA acting without congressional legislation.
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Though I loathe it, I must stand with the Republicans on this issue...

Why must we attack a poor asteroid that's just going along minding its own business...
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,074
10,408
136
If only we had a dictatorship to make the correct decisions, such as this, for us.
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
This artical is so far from the truth it's not even funny.
Republicans love spending money on weapons. they'd all be for blowing something up.


And why is a joke thread in P&N.

I hope the OP knows the Onion posts fake articles.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
I had a suspicion that this was an onion article, and was relieved for it to be. Maybe I'm to politically pessimistic, but it seems that Boehner and his House allies would try to repeal any Obama-backed bill, even if it only declared that eating toast butter-side up is the most delicious way to do so. Fail on my part.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
My first thought when I saw the thread was "must be an Onion article.

My second thought was "No, it's probably real and just sounds like an Onion article".
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
I had a suspicion that this was an onion article, and was relieved for it to be. Maybe I'm to politically pessimistic, but it seems that Boehner and his House allies would try to repeal any Obama-backed bill, even if it only declared that eating toast butter-side up is the most delicious way to do so. Fail on my part.

Clearly toast should be eaten butter side down so that the most flavor hits the taste buds immediately.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
The clear solution is to butter both sides of the toast.

Oh snap. unfortunately we'd have to trade the most flavorful option for an increase in negativity as the bread will always land butter side down :(
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,332
34,816
136
Oh snap. unfortunately we'd have to trade the most flavorful option for an increase in negativity as the bread will always land butter side down :(
Which is why one should only eat toast while in bed.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
We cannot afford this plan because we have the more serious task of saving the environment from milk.

One of these two is not like the other.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,639
33,213
136
30% of Republicans will believe this and it will be the lead story on Fox and Friends tomorrow.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
We cannot afford this plan because we have the more serious task of saving the environment from milk.

One of these two is not like the other.

Milk contains non-petroleum oil, and is one of the biggest risk to our nations water supply.
 

dali71

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2003
1,117
21
81
Screw asteroids, I want to know what they're going to do about the impending robot invasion. Because when they grab you with those metal claws, you can't break free...because they're made of metal, and robots are strong.
 
Last edited:

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Screw asteroids, I want to know what they're going to do the impending robot invasion. Because when they grab you with those metal claws, you can't break free...because they're made of metal, and robots are strong.

Just give them old people's medicine... That's all they really want...
 

Lanyap

Elite Member
Dec 23, 2000
8,295
2,391
136
LOL - though I'm sure the US has some type of asteroid avoidance plan. I hope Brownie's not in charge.

Space experts call for contingency plan against Earth Killer asteroid strike
by Stevie Smith - Nov 26 2008, 13:00


Worried star-gazing experts have this week submitted a pre-emptive report to the United Nations in Vienna, calling for the urgent development of preventative measures designed to help avoid the possible planetary collision of so-called Earth Killer asteroids.

According to the international Association of Space Explorers (ASE) and its Asteroid Threats: A Call for Global Response report, “several dozen” of the currently known 5,600 near-Earth objects present a very real threat in terms of hitting the planet and inflicting localised or regional devastation.

And that number is likely to rise considerably given that some 500,000 other potentially dangerous chunks of roaming space debris are expected to be uncovered over the course of the next 15 years as better location technology is created.

“This is a natural disaster, which is larger, potentially, than any other natural disaster we know of,” commented ASE member and former Apollo 9 astronaut Rusty Schweickart in an AP report. “However, it is preventable... that's a very important thing to keep in mind. But it is our responsibility to take action to do that.”

In order to actively counter any growing threats, the ASE report wants the United Nations and its member states to construct a focused location and communication framework so that contributing governments can easily share information related to asteroid tracking while also working together with a view to engineering possible lifesaving solutions.

On the subject of possible prevention, the ASE maintains that adequate technological knowledge already exists to help increase the chance of collision avoidance, offering up solutions such as breaking up an incoming asteroid with nuclear weaponry, or by using the gravitational forces of a nearby spaceship to alter its trajectory.

While solutions involving the potential destruction of any sizeable near-Earth object would likely lead to several smaller impacts, the ASE maintains that localised damage is preferable to total loss of life across the planet and that any structured warning system would help expedite evacuations in possible impact areas.

The international Association of Space Explorers consists of some 320 people who have made the journey into space during their lives.

The most recent collision of note suffered by the planet happened in 1908 when the infamous Tunguska object exploded over a remote part of central Siberia, unleashing enough power to level around 60 million trees across a 2,150 square kilometre blast zone.

http://www.thetechherald.com/articl...ncy-plan-against-earth-killer-asteroid-strike