soulcougher73
Lifer
- Nov 29, 2006
- 15,861
- 4,425
- 136
This is just digging the whole deeper for the GOP. Once a great power, not just scraps of its former self.
Change would come once the Democrats become to big for their britches.
They were spanked badly twice before in the past 30 years.
Rigging the outcome? To be more representative of the peoples votes within a state?
If a swing state adopts such; you will see other states controlled by Democrats but on the Republican side of the ledger adapt such. Every electoral vote is important; to ensure that their side gets the extra vote is critical.
Proportional representation is one way to ensure that for an underdog.
Politicians would just campaign, and pander to, large population centers.
I think that's a worse system than we have now.
Fern
I want everyone's vote to count based on what makes sense for the U.S. in the 21st century. I don't give a fuck what system made sense for 13 mostly independent states 230 years ago.
Swing states are just that; you do not know which way they will be called.
Proportional allows the underdog (in any state) to have their votes mean more.
It also reduces the impact of swing states.
If proportional would give the Democrats 3 votes from Texas instead of 0 that could compensate for worrying about swings in Nevada.