WASHINGTON ― On a Sunday in early February,
Hillary Clinton appeared on ABC’s “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos to defend her relationship with Wall Street. Her primary challenger Bernie Sanders had been pillorying her over paid speeches to Goldman Sachs.
A video of Elizabeth Warren was circulating showing the consumer champion criticizing Clinton for supporting a bankruptcy bill that helped credit card companies
squeeze vulnerable families. Clinton had opposed the bill as first lady, Warren said, but had fallen under Wall Street’s sway in the Senate.
People had it all wrong, Clinton told Stephanopoulos. She hadn’t switched her position to appease financiers. She had helped women’s groups fix the bill to protect single mothers. Clinton said:
I was deluged by women’s groups and children’s advocates groups to do everything I could to make sure that child support and women’s precarious financial situation in case of divorce or not being able to get the kind of funding they needed from a partner or a spouse in bankruptcy would not be in danger. … So I did go to work on behalf of all of these women’s groups and children’s groups because they needed a champion. … Nobody else was helping them. They were desperate to get help.
Clinton expressed outrage that her primary opponent would result to “innuendo, insinuation charges” about her record. “It had nothing to do with any money whatsoever, and I resent deeply any effort by the Sanders campaign to so imply.”
It was a forceful, detailed defense. There was just one hitch. It wasn’t true. And according to a trove of internal emails recently released by WikiLeaks, Clinton’s team knew it.
“We have a problem,” Clinton senior policy advisor Ann O’Leary wrote to campaign staffers that afternoon. “HRC overstayed (sic) her case this morning in a pretty big way.”
“What did she say that was wrong?” spokeswoman Kristina Schake replied.
“She said women groups were all pressuring her to vote for it,” O’Leary wrote back. “Evidence does not support that statement.”