• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Republicans Getting Testy With Chicago Style Politics

PJABBER

Diamond Member
I guess it is getting personal when Ranking Member Darrell Issa (R-CA) of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform sends out a press release castigating Rahm Emanuel for an ongoing intimidation campaign.

I believe there is going to be a significant push back after the August recess and it will be in the form of investigations and a campaign to expose the way the stimulus program has failed to do any stimulating...

Issa to Emanuel: Back Off!

Press Release

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM

http://republicans.oversight.house.gov

U.S. House of Representatives
News Release
Issa to Emanuel: Back Off!

August 4, 2009
WASHINGTON. D.C. ? Following reports that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel has been orchestrating an effort to intimidate members of Congress and Governors who raise legitimate concerns regarding the effectiveness of the stimulus, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Ranking Member Darrell Issa (R-CA) sent a letter to Emanuel saying ?While this type of scare tactic may work In Chicago, it will not work to intimidate me or other Members of the United States Congress.?

?I and others have dared to bring these facts to the attention of President Obama, the Congress and the American people,? Issa wrote. ?You?ve unfortunately reacted by once again resorting to the playbook of the Chicago political machine.?

Last month, Politico reported that Emanuel had ?launched a coordinated effort to jam? Senator Kyl and other Administration critics? ?[A]fter seeing Kyl and House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) again paint the legislation as a failure on Sunday talk shows, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel directed that the letters from the Cabinet secretaries be sent to [Governor] Brewer, according to two administration officials.?

Issa noted, ?The fact that the letters were coordinated by you to maximize the level of intimidation is supported by the timing, structure, and content of each letter. Not only were the four letters all sent the day following Senator Kyl?s remarks, but they were also remarkably similar in tone and sentence structure.?

Letter from Ray LaHood, Secretary of Transportation:

On Sunday, Arizona Senator Jon Kyl publicly questioned whether the stimulus is working and stated that he wants to cancel projects that aren?t presently underway. I believe the stimulus has been very effective in creating job opportunities throughout the country. However, if you prefer to forfeit the money we are making available to your state, as Senator Kyl suggests, please let me know [emphasis added].

Letter from Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior:

Some key Republican leaders in Congress have publicly questioned whether the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is working and suggested cancelling all projects that are not currently in progress. I believe they are wrong. The stimulus funds provided through the Recovery Act are a very effective way to create job opportunities throughout the Country. However, if you prefer to forfeit the money we are making available to Arizona, please let me know [emphasis added].

?At what point do you believe your practice of Chicago-style politics violates a public official?s right to speak out in favor of alternative policies,? Issa asks. ?The American people have a right to know what role you played in developing the threatening letters to Governor Brewer and whether you intend to continue to engage in these tactics in the future.?

In order to assist the Committee with its investigation of this issue, please provide the following information by close of business on Tuesday, August 11, 2009:

1. Your response to Politico?s report that ?White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel directed that the letters from the Cabinet secretaries be sent to [Governor] Brewer, according to two administration officials.?

2. A full and complete explanation of the development of the four July 13 letters from the cabinet secretaries to Governor Brewer, including but not limited to the role you or any other White House official played in writing the letters or encouraging the writing of the letters.

3. All records and communications between you and Secretary LaHood, Secretary Salazar, Secretary Donovan, and Secretary Vilsack referring or relating to the decision to send the July 13 letters to Governor Brewer.

4. A full and complete explanation of the role of the Democratic National Committee and the White House Office of Political Affairs in authoring, encouraging, facilitating, or directing the four July 13 letters from the cabinet secretaries to Governor Brewer.

You can view a copy of the full letter to Emanuel by clicking here -

WOW!
 
Nice! Good for her. I especially like these cahones:

"Since I represent a district in the great state of Califomia, I hope that you will not
take this letter as an indication of Governor Schwarzenegger's position on stimulus funds
dedicated to California nor his position on any other public policy issue. I can assure you
that any attempt to intimidate me or silence my criticism of the stimulus through such
Chicago-style tactics will be futile.
"
 
Sad that our country is now headed down the road of "Chicago style politics", ie, corruption and intimidation on an unprecedented scale. 🙁
 
Originally posted by: PokerGuy
Sad that our country is now headed down the road of "Chicago style politics", ie, corruption and intimidation on an unprecedented scale. 🙁

Well we voted in a Chicago Politician, so go figure..
 
Looks like GOP wants to oppose stimulus but have their constituents benefit from it anyways. They need to decide. If they don't think it's effective, they should have no problem with their districts not getting any.
 
Originally posted by: senseamp
Looks like GOP wants to oppose stimulus but have their constituents benefit from it anyways. They need to decide. If they don't think it's effective, they should have no problem with their districts not getting any.

That would be the first of two hypocrisies brought out in this thread. Extra cookie if someone can find the other 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: senseamp
Looks like GOP wants to oppose stimulus but have their constituents benefit from it anyways. They need to decide. If they don't think it's effective, they should have no problem with their districts not getting any.

That would be the first of two hypocrisies brought out in this thread. Extra cookie if someone can find the other 🙂

Issa is a bigger thug than Emanuel
 
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: senseamp
Looks like GOP wants to oppose stimulus but have their constituents benefit from it anyways. They need to decide. If they don't think it's effective, they should have no problem with their districts not getting any.

That would be the first of two hypocrisies brought out in this thread. Extra cookie if someone can find the other 🙂

Issa is a bigger thug than Emanuel

Ok, not the one I was thinking of but :cookie:


Still (at least) one more out there cookie hunters ...
 
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: senseamp
Looks like GOP wants to oppose stimulus but have their constituents benefit from it anyways. They need to decide. If they don't think it's effective, they should have no problem with their districts not getting any.

That would be the first of two hypocrisies brought out in this thread. Extra cookie if someone can find the other 🙂

Issa is a bigger thug than Emanuel

Ok, not the one I was thinking of but :cookie:


Still (at least) one more out there cookie hunters ...

That Republicans love to play dirty politics, but cry like little girls when they get it back?
 
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: senseamp
Looks like GOP wants to oppose stimulus but have their constituents benefit from it anyways. They need to decide. If they don't think it's effective, they should have no problem with their districts not getting any.

That would be the first of two hypocrisies brought out in this thread. Extra cookie if someone can find the other 🙂

The second would be where you leftist tools defend this kind of behavior after crying about it for 8 years.
 
CHICAGO POLITICS
CHICAGO POLITICS
CHICAGO POLITICS
CHICAGO POLITICS
CHICAGO POLITICS
CHICAGO POLITICS
C
H
I
C
A
G
O
P
O
L
I
T
S
CHICAGO
POLITICS
C
H
I
C
A
G
O

P
O
L
I
T
I
C
S
 
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: senseamp
Looks like GOP wants to oppose stimulus but have their constituents benefit from it anyways. They need to decide. If they don't think it's effective, they should have no problem with their districts not getting any.

That would be the first of two hypocrisies brought out in this thread. Extra cookie if someone can find the other 🙂

Issa is a bigger thug than Emanuel

Ok, not the one I was thinking of but :cookie:


Still (at least) one more out there cookie hunters ...

That Republicans love to play dirty politics, but cry like little girls when they get it back?

One :cookie: for you ...
 
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: senseamp
Looks like GOP wants to oppose stimulus but have their constituents benefit from it anyways. They need to decide. If they don't think it's effective, they should have no problem with their districts not getting any.

That would be the first of two hypocrisies brought out in this thread. Extra cookie if someone can find the other 🙂

The second would be where you leftist tools defend this kind of behavior after crying about it for 8 years.

Swing and a miss. I don't see any hint of illegal activity here. Which is what us "librulz" were upset with during the previous administration. (US attorney bit, Cheney's secret energy meetings, Plame-gate, etc.)

This bit about Emanuel is really petty considering the tactics used by W's crew.
 
Darrel Issa is a moron. He is the one that got the recall of Gov Gray Davis going with a large financial contribution to the recall campaign, thinking he was going to be the next Governor, then Terminator stepped in and sucked all of the air out of the room.

He also owns a company that makes those awful car alarms you try to ignore at night.

I am also glad that Democrats are finally playing some hardball politics after getting whipped by Republican tricksters for years. Rahm Emmanuel is very smart.
 
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: senseamp
Looks like GOP wants to oppose stimulus but have their constituents benefit from it anyways. They need to decide. If they don't think it's effective, they should have no problem with their districts not getting any.

That would be the first of two hypocrisies brought out in this thread. Extra cookie if someone can find the other 🙂

The second would be where you leftist tools defend this kind of behavior after crying about it for 8 years.

Swing and a miss. I don't see any hint of illegal activity here. Which is what us "librulz" were upset with during the previous administration. (US attorney bit, Cheney's secret energy meetings, Plame-gate, etc.)

This bit about Emanuel is really petty considering the tactics used by W's crew.

What illegal activity? Where are all the convictions? Put up or shut up.
 
Originally posted by: UberNeuman

That Republicans love to play dirty politics, but cry like little girls when they get it back?

Seeing the Republicans both in here, TV and radio crying like babies has been absolutely delicious.
 
Back
Top