It is NOT flip-flopping if new relevant information comes and with that new information you change your mind. It is flip-flopping if no new information comes and you change your mind (for example if a poll shows you will do better by changing your mind).Originally posted by: Todd33
Flip-flopper!
Originally posted by: dullard
Link. It takes a lot of guts to change your mind and publically admit it. I applaud any politician on either side who speaks what he/she truly feels and not what he/she is told to say.
Originally posted by: conjur
Wow...how many conservatives does this make that are critical of Bush and have gone so far as to outright change their opinion of the war?
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Wow...how many conservatives does this make that are critical of Bush and have gone so far as to outright change their opinion of the war?
And one wonders why kerry says he still would have voted for the war even knowing what we know today. Go figure...
dazed and confused is his only alibi
CkG
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Wow...how many conservatives does this make that are critical of Bush and have gone so far as to outright change their opinion of the war?
And one wonders why kerry says he still would have voted for the war even knowing what we know today. Go figure...
dazed and confused is his only alibi
CkG
Originally posted by: DonVito
The operative word here is retiring Republican congressman. Unfortunately I doubt he would have been so forthcoming if he still had a career to look out for.
Rep. Ray LaHood, R-Illinois, a member of the intelligence committee, described Bereuter as "very bitter" for having been passed over in recent years to head both the intelligence and international relations committees. He suggested Bereuter's comments were a parting shot to House GOP leaders and President Bush.
Originally posted by: MidasKnight
Maybe an axe to grind ?
Rep. Ray LaHood, R-Illinois, a member of the intelligence committee, described Bereuter as "very bitter" for having been passed over in recent years to head both the intelligence and international relations committees. He suggested Bereuter's comments were a parting shot to House GOP leaders and President Bush.
and it may also be that Rep LaHood's statement is just a nasty, unfair snipe intended to discredit Bereute
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Wow...how many conservatives does this make that are critical of Bush and have gone so far as to outright change their opinion of the war?
And one wonders why kerry says he still would have voted for the war even knowing what we know today. Go figure...
dazed and confused is his only alibi
CkG
Correct me if i am wrong, but he never voted FOR the war, did he?
He voted for the ability to use war as the last resort given the (false) evidence presented, did he not?
I may very well be wrong here, i don't know that much about US internal politics and i really don't care either.
Originally posted by: Todd33
I suggest you read the resolution, it was not a war declaration and Bush was supposed to get a second UN resolution. I guess the devil is in the details, but sometimes governmenting is hard.
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Todd33
I suggest you read the resolution, it was not a war declaration and Bush was supposed to get a second UN resolution. I guess the devil is in the details, but sometimes governmenting is hard.
I have read it - many times. kerry can try to nuance all he wants but it doesn't change what the vote meant. Some people want to play this little naive game but we all knew the reality of that resolution, and so did he.
But anyway, it should be interesting to see how this sour grapes thing pans out - if that is the "why" of it.
CkG