• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Repost: How green are you?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: eelw
Was bored, the highest you can get is 21 planets.
Click to expand...

Bull, I got 25 without lying.

1 person, 2,500_ sq ft house, 0 miles for public transport or motor bike, 400+ miles in car, eat lots of meat, lots of waste, 100 hours a year flying.
 
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Originally posted by: eelw
Was bored, the highest you can get is 21 planets.
Click to expand...

Bull, I got 25 without lying.

1 person, 2,500_ sq ft house, 0 miles for public transport or motor bike, 400+ miles in car, eat lots of meat, lots of waste, 100 hours a year flying.
Click to expand...

I wonder if the 1st screen has any impact then? Because I chose all the worst choices.
 
Originally posted by: eelw
I wonder if the 1st screen has any impact then? Because I chose all the worst choices.
Click to expand...

My "approximate location" is more wasteful than your "approximate location." Pwned!
 
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.4 PLANETS.

I need to get a hybird car and stop eating processed foods.
 
I have no fvcking clue what the weather is like in Kwangju, Pusan, or Seoul. Which one is most like Northern California?

Edit: apparently you don't jsut have to pick "English" on the main screen, you have to have the mouse over the US when you do it.
 
CATEGORY ACRES

FOOD 5.2

MOBILITY 0.2

SHELTER 4.4

GOODS/SERVICES 4.2

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 14



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.

I've slipped a lot since moving in with my g/f, she's wasteful as hell. Yeah I'm a bike person, who rarely eats meat.
 
CATEGORY ACRES

FOOD 5.4

MOBILITY 0.5

SHELTER 3.5

GOODS/SERVICES 2.7

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 12

IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.7 PLANETS.
 


CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 6.9
MOBILITY 4.9
SHELTER 8.4
GOODS/SERVICES 12.1
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 32



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.



IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 7.3 PLANETS.
 
Pseudoscientific bullsh!t. Think of this: when humans lived in mud huts as hunter-gatherers, the earth was barely "capable" of supporting much more than a million humans. Now there are more than 6 billion. What changed?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top