Originally posted by: MotF Bane
Good luck, AT&T. :laugh:
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: MotF Bane
Good luck, AT&T. :laugh:
AT&T execs are going to be on every mailing list, spam list, etc for the rest of their natural lives....
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: MotF Bane
Good luck, AT&T. :laugh:
AT&T execs are going to be on every mailing list, spam list, etc for the rest of their natural lives....
Originally posted by: kylebisme
I use AT&T DSL, 4chan loads fine.
Originally posted by: dammitgibs
Originally posted by: kylebisme
I use AT&T DSL, 4chan loads fine.
I have AT&T DSL and can load 4chan.org but not img.4chan.org and /b/ I get "Connection Interrupted"
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Elfear
So for those who are ignorant like me, what is 4chan?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4chan
Originally posted by: rpanic
Originally posted by: dammitgibs
Originally posted by: kylebisme
I use AT&T DSL, 4chan loads fine.
I have AT&T DSL and can load 4chan.org but not img.4chan.org and /b/ I get "Connection Interrupted"
Same here, this is going to be fun.
Later that year, the private Yahoo! Mail account of Sarah Palin, Republican vice presidential candidate in the 2008 United States presidential election, was hacked by a 4chan user. This followed criticism of Palin and other politicians supposedly using private email accounts for governmental work.[44] The hacker posted the account's password on /b/, and screenshots from within the account to Wikileaks.[45] A /b/ user then logged in and changed the password, posting a screenshot of his sending an email to a friend of Palin's informing her of the new password on the /b/ thread. However, he forgot to blank out the password in the screenshot.[46] A multitude of /b/ users attempted to log in with the new password, and the account was automatically locked out by Yahoo!. The incident was criticized by some /b/ users, one of whom complained that "seriously, /b/. We could have changed history and failed, epically."[47] The FBI and Secret Service began investigating the incident shortly after its occurrence. On September 20 it was revealed they were questioning David Kernell, the son of Democratic Tennessee State Representative Mike Kernell.[48]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Originally posted by: dammitgibs
Originally posted by: Patranus
If you don't like the service that AT&T provides than switch internet providers. Nothing is forcing you to have an AT&T service.
What if AT&T and Comcast are the only two offering service in my area and they both censor? Is that how this will end?
Originally posted by: Winterpool
I've never visited 4chan, and I suspect I wouldn't enjoy much of what's on /b/. That said, an ISP has summarily censored the Internet. I realise the US First Amendment doesn't protect everything, but this is fairly bleeding egregious. It's almost as if AT&T wants network neutrality legislation rammed down their throats.
I leave it to the 4chan punters to resort to whatever questionable tactics we'll probably read about in the coming days. In the meantime, write your Congressmen, contact the mainstream media, and send in a donation to the EFF.
UPDATED 5: From rumors on /b/, it seems 4chan?s first retaliatory strike will be towards Randall Stephenson, CEO of AT&T. The Consumerist has more. There are also murmurs about the AT&T block being put into place because of supposed mass DDoS-attacks to and from img.4chan.org, but so far there has been no official, verifiable response from AT&T.
Well, I didn't see 207.126.64.182 or 207.126.64.181 in any block lists in the uverse routers , but that isn't to say they aren't blocked on the backbone someplace.
We obviously aren't blocking the entire site or any particular link due to content because I can still access everything else but the links using the IP's above.
If we where going to block a site, it wouldn't normally just be bits and parts, it would be all of it.
However, if they where blocked, their service provider should have received an email with the appropriate contact information to get it resolved.
They might want to think about taking it up with them.
Yeah unfortunately most of the people there are idiots. They're currently organizing DDoS attacks and other nonsense that isn't going to help their cause.Originally posted by: Winterpool
I've never visited 4chan, and I suspect I wouldn't enjoy much of what's on /b/. That said, an ISP has summarily censored the Internet. I realise the US First Amendment doesn't protect everything, but this is fairly bleeding egregious. It's almost as if AT&T wants network neutrality legislation rammed down their throats.
I leave it to the 4chan punters to resort to whatever questionable tactics we'll probably read about in the coming days. In the meantime, write your Congressmen, contact the mainstream media, and send in a donation to the EFF.
Originally posted by: frostedflakes
Yeah unfortunately most of the people there are idiots. They're currently organizing DDoS attacks and other nonsense that isn't going to help their cause.
That makes a lot of sense actually. Probably a lot of residential customers on botnets (IIRC these are what have been responsible for the DDoS attacks over the last few months on /b/). I'm sure these botnets chew through a crapload of bandwidth.Originally posted by: MotF Bane
From a couple of posts on /b/, supposedly someone called AT&T and heard that it's being blocked due to bandwidth issues, that /b/ gets DDOS'd frequently and AT&T has to deal with the bandwidth load.
