Reports that AT&T is blocking 4chan are popping up everywhere

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
I'd imagine if this gets enough media attention the block will be lifted pretty quickly. Even if 4chan's /b/ isn't a site they visit, I don't think most Americans are too keen on the idea of their internet being censored. AT&T will probably see the same kind of backlash TWC saw when they were talking about rolling out metered service.
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: MotF Bane
Good luck, AT&T. :laugh:

AT&T execs are going to be on every mailing list, spam list, etc for the rest of their natural lives....

i got a feeling it's going to be much, much worse than that. :gorillarape:
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: MotF Bane
Good luck, AT&T. :laugh:

AT&T execs are going to be on every mailing list, spam list, etc for the rest of their natural lives....

Seems like an odd thing to sensor. Gonna suck if this was a networking screw up.....
 

rpanic

Golden Member
Dec 1, 2006
1,896
7
81
Originally posted by: dammitgibs
Originally posted by: kylebisme
I use AT&T DSL, 4chan loads fine.

I have AT&T DSL and can load 4chan.org but not img.4chan.org and /b/ I get "Connection Interrupted"

Same here, this is going to be fun.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Yep, I have ATT dsl, and I can get to the other channels, but not /b/. While I don't typically go to 4chan, I find it very irritating that ATT would choose to censor my internet.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
I did not know this. From Wikipedia:

Later that year, the private Yahoo! Mail account of Sarah Palin, Republican vice presidential candidate in the 2008 United States presidential election, was hacked by a 4chan user. This followed criticism of Palin and other politicians supposedly using private email accounts for governmental work.[44] The hacker posted the account's password on /b/, and screenshots from within the account to Wikileaks.[45] A /b/ user then logged in and changed the password, posting a screenshot of his sending an email to a friend of Palin's informing her of the new password on the /b/ thread. However, he forgot to blank out the password in the screenshot.[46] A multitude of /b/ users attempted to log in with the new password, and the account was automatically locked out by Yahoo!. The incident was criticized by some /b/ users, one of whom complained that "seriously, /b/. We could have changed history and failed, epically."[47] The FBI and Secret Service began investigating the incident shortly after its occurrence. On September 20 it was revealed they were questioning David Kernell, the son of Democratic Tennessee State Representative Mike Kernell.[48]
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Originally posted by: dammitgibs
Originally posted by: Patranus
If you don't like the service that AT&T provides than switch internet providers. Nothing is forcing you to have an AT&T service.

What if AT&T and Comcast are the only two offering service in my area and they both censor? Is that how this will end?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bullshit, maybe in some cities people are free to switch to Comcast from AT&T, but I am in a rural area, AT&T is my monopoly phone provider, and I have no such choice.

Meanwhile I am waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting to even get vanilla dsl service from AT&T, and they clearly have a public be damned attitude.

But one bright spot, we can now all tell all subscription based TV delivery systems you are fired, and thanks to the digital TV transition, we can get better than cable quality pictures over the air for free.
 

Winterpool

Senior member
Mar 1, 2008
830
0
0
I've never visited 4chan, and I suspect I wouldn't enjoy much of what's on /b/. That said, an ISP has summarily censored the Internet. I realise the US First Amendment doesn't protect everything, but this is fairly bleeding egregious. It's almost as if AT&T wants network neutrality legislation rammed down their throats.

I leave it to the 4chan punters to resort to whatever questionable tactics we'll probably read about in the coming days. In the meantime, write your Congressmen, contact the mainstream media, and send in a donation to the EFF.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Winterpool
I've never visited 4chan, and I suspect I wouldn't enjoy much of what's on /b/. That said, an ISP has summarily censored the Internet. I realise the US First Amendment doesn't protect everything, but this is fairly bleeding egregious. It's almost as if AT&T wants network neutrality legislation rammed down their throats.

I leave it to the 4chan punters to resort to whatever questionable tactics we'll probably read about in the coming days. In the meantime, write your Congressmen, contact the mainstream media, and send in a donation to the EFF.

yeap. i don't care what your thoughts are on 4chan or if there are other service providers. this is wrong.

hope this really comes back to bite AT&T in the ass. seems like a dumb choice actually
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
UPDATED 5: From rumors on /b/, it seems 4chan?s first retaliatory strike will be towards Randall Stephenson, CEO of AT&T. The Consumerist has more. There are also murmurs about the AT&T block being put into place because of supposed mass DDoS-attacks to and from img.4chan.org, but so far there has been no official, verifiable response from AT&T.

and also

Well, I didn't see 207.126.64.182 or 207.126.64.181 in any block lists in the uverse routers , but that isn't to say they aren't blocked on the backbone someplace.

We obviously aren't blocking the entire site or any particular link due to content because I can still access everything else but the links using the IP's above.

If we where going to block a site, it wouldn't normally just be bits and parts, it would be all of it.

However, if they where blocked, their service provider should have received an email with the appropriate contact information to get it resolved.

They might want to think about taking it up with them.

from linkage


Looks like this shoot first, ask questions later might be a bad tactic for 4chan.....
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
Originally posted by: Winterpool
I've never visited 4chan, and I suspect I wouldn't enjoy much of what's on /b/. That said, an ISP has summarily censored the Internet. I realise the US First Amendment doesn't protect everything, but this is fairly bleeding egregious. It's almost as if AT&T wants network neutrality legislation rammed down their throats.

I leave it to the 4chan punters to resort to whatever questionable tactics we'll probably read about in the coming days. In the meantime, write your Congressmen, contact the mainstream media, and send in a donation to the EFF.
Yeah unfortunately most of the people there are idiots. They're currently organizing DDoS attacks and other nonsense that isn't going to help their cause.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
Originally posted by: frostedflakes

Yeah unfortunately most of the people there are idiots. They're currently organizing DDoS attacks and other nonsense that isn't going to help their cause.

yeah but it will be fun.
 

MotF Bane

No Lifer
Dec 22, 2006
60,801
10
0
From a couple of posts on /b/, supposedly someone called AT&T and heard that it's being blocked due to bandwidth issues, that /b/ gets DDOS'd frequently and AT&T has to deal with the bandwidth load.
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
Originally posted by: MotF Bane
From a couple of posts on /b/, supposedly someone called AT&T and heard that it's being blocked due to bandwidth issues, that /b/ gets DDOS'd frequently and AT&T has to deal with the bandwidth load.
That makes a lot of sense actually. Probably a lot of residential customers on botnets (IIRC these are what have been responsible for the DDoS attacks over the last few months on /b/). I'm sure these botnets chew through a crapload of bandwidth.
 

Winterpool

Senior member
Mar 1, 2008
830
0
0
Latest updates suggest that 4chan is blocked owing to violation of ToS. AT&T has refused to clarify further. Presuming AT&T has informed moot of the specific violations, we'll have to wait on 4chan's report.