• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Report: Tanning beds as deadly as arsenic & mustard gas

MrMatt

Banned
link

LONDON - International cancer experts have moved tanning beds and other sources of ultraviolet radiation into the top cancer risk category, deeming them as deadly as arsenic and mustard gas.

For years, scientists have described tanning beds and ultraviolet radiation as "probable carcinogens."

A new analysis of about 20 studies concludes the risk of skin cancer jumps by 75 percent when people start using tanning beds before age 30. Experts also found that all types of ultraviolet radiation caused worrying mutations in mice, proof the radiation is carcinogenic. Previously, only one type of ultraviolet radiation was thought to be lethal.


The new classification means tanning beds and other sources of ultraviolet radiation are definite causes of cancer, alongside tobacco, the hepatitis B virus and chimney sweeping, among others.

The research was published online in the medical journal Lancet Oncology on Wednesday, by experts at the International Agency for Research on Cancer in Lyon, the cancer arm of the World Health Organization.

"People need to be reminded of the risks of sunbeds," said Vincent Cogliano, one of the cancer researchers. "We hope the prevailing culture will change so teens don't think they need to use sunbeds to get a tan."


Most lights used in tanning beds give off mainly ultraviolet radiation, which cause skin and eye cancer, according to the International Agency for Cancer Research.

The classification of tanning beds as carcinogenic was disputed by Kathy Banks, chief executive of The Sunbed Association, a European trade association of tanning bed makers and operators.

"The fact that is continuously ignored is that there is no proven link between the responsible use of sunbeds and skin cancer," Banks said in a statement. She said most users of tanning beds use them less than 20 times a year.

But as use of tanning beds has increased among people under 30, doctors have seen a parallel rise in the numbers of young people with skin cancer. In Britain, melanoma, the deadliest kind of skin cancer, is now the leading cancer diagnosed in women in their 20s. Normally, skin cancer rates are highest in people over 75.

Previous studies found younger people who regularly use tanning beds are eight times more likely to get melanoma than people who have never used them. In the past, WHO warned people younger than 18 to stay away from tanning beds.

Cogliano cautioned that ultravoilet radiation is not healthy, whether it comes from a tanning bed or from the sun. The American Cancer Society advises people to try bronzing or self-tanning creams instead of tanning beds.
 
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Everyone who's surprised by this raise your hand....

I'm shocked at the number of retarded 20 year old girls that talk about shit like 'base tans'.
 
"Cogliano cautioned that ultravoilet radiation is not healthy, whether it comes from a tanning bed or from the sun."

So if I don't get out in the sun much, A tanning bed should be less lethal to me, correct?
 
Originally posted by: skace
"Cogliano cautioned that ultravoilet radiation is not healthy, whether it comes from a tanning bed or from the sun."

So if I don't get out in the sun much, A tanning bed should be less lethal to me, correct?

Occupational exposure to UV light is better than occasional. The weekend warrior has more to worry about than a construction worker would.
 
Originally posted by: skace
"Cogliano cautioned that ultravoilet radiation is not healthy, whether it comes from a tanning bed or from the sun."

So if I don't get out in the sun much, A tanning bed should be less lethal to me, correct?

The funny thing is that you can pretty much trend the advent of high SPF sunscreen with the rapid rise in osteoporosis. You need *some* sunlight exposure to prevent vitamin D deficiency.

 
Originally posted by: vi edit
The funny thing is that you can pretty much trend the advent of high SPF sunscreen with the rapid rise in osteoporosis. You need *some* sunlight exposure to prevent vitamin D deficiency.

Right, so I don't think this study clarified anything for me. In the age of people being indoors 99% of their day, (hell, during winter, I can go the entire day without even seeing the sun), why should I be avoiding tanning beds? Maybe they'd actually make me healthier in moderation.

For what it's worth, I've never used one, however I've been contemplating it as my legs are fucking pale.
 
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: vi edit
The funny thing is that you can pretty much trend the advent of high SPF sunscreen with the rapid rise in osteoporosis. You need *some* sunlight exposure to prevent vitamin D deficiency.

Right, so I don't think this study clarified anything for me. In the age of people being indoors 99% of their day, (hell, during winter, I can go the entire day without even seeing the sun), why should I be avoiding tanning beds? Maybe they'd actually make me healthier in moderation.

For what it's worth, I've never used one, however I've been contemplating it as my legs are fucking pale.

You only need about 15 minutes of sunlight per day for your vitamin D needs, maybe even less depending on diet.
 
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: vi edit
The funny thing is that you can pretty much trend the advent of high SPF sunscreen with the rapid rise in osteoporosis. You need *some* sunlight exposure to prevent vitamin D deficiency.

Right, so I don't think this study clarified anything for me. In the age of people being indoors 99% of their day, (hell, during winter, I can go the entire day without even seeing the sun), why should I be avoiding tanning beds? Maybe they'd actually make me healthier in moderation.

For what it's worth, I've never used one, however I've been contemplating it as my legs are fucking pale.

Wouldn't it be more practical to just go outside, especially at this time of year?
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: vi edit
The funny thing is that you can pretty much trend the advent of high SPF sunscreen with the rapid rise in osteoporosis. You need *some* sunlight exposure to prevent vitamin D deficiency.

Right, so I don't think this study clarified anything for me. In the age of people being indoors 99% of their day, (hell, during winter, I can go the entire day without even seeing the sun), why should I be avoiding tanning beds? Maybe they'd actually make me healthier in moderation.

For what it's worth, I've never used one, however I've been contemplating it as my legs are fucking pale.

Wouldn't it be more practical to just go outside, especially at this time of year?

So you're suggesting nudity outside as a solution?

 
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: vi edit
The funny thing is that you can pretty much trend the advent of high SPF sunscreen with the rapid rise in osteoporosis. You need *some* sunlight exposure to prevent vitamin D deficiency.

Right, so I don't think this study clarified anything for me. In the age of people being indoors 99% of their day, (hell, during winter, I can go the entire day without even seeing the sun), why should I be avoiding tanning beds? Maybe they'd actually make me healthier in moderation.

For what it's worth, I've never used one, however I've been contemplating it as my legs are fucking pale.

That's what I hate about articles like this. Sensational headlines and filler, little statistical value. You don't know if the people in the article are reading novels in a tanning booth and spending upwards of hours per week in there. Or if they are in for a 5-10 minute warming once or twice a week. Or using them only for a week or two before going on vacation to prevent from being lobsterfied while they crash on a beach for week.

The other funny thing is that the article discusses people from Britian. Could you pick a worse country to base that on? British people make toilet paper look dark. They get limited sun on that chronically overcast isle so of course they are going to be hyper sensitive to excess exposure.
 
Originally posted by: Phokus
Funny, women who don't tan or go out in the sun age slower

Yea, no shit. I've seen girls in their mid 20s that look like they've worked in landscaping since they were 11. It looks terrible.
 
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: vi edit
The funny thing is that you can pretty much trend the advent of high SPF sunscreen with the rapid rise in osteoporosis. You need *some* sunlight exposure to prevent vitamin D deficiency.

Right, so I don't think this study clarified anything for me. In the age of people being indoors 99% of their day, (hell, during winter, I can go the entire day without even seeing the sun), why should I be avoiding tanning beds? Maybe they'd actually make me healthier in moderation.

For what it's worth, I've never used one, however I've been contemplating it as my legs are fucking pale.

Wouldn't it be more practical to just go outside, especially at this time of year?

So you're suggesting nudity outside as a solution?

Don't I always?
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: vi edit
The funny thing is that you can pretty much trend the advent of high SPF sunscreen with the rapid rise in osteoporosis. You need *some* sunlight exposure to prevent vitamin D deficiency.

Right, so I don't think this study clarified anything for me. In the age of people being indoors 99% of their day, (hell, during winter, I can go the entire day without even seeing the sun), why should I be avoiding tanning beds? Maybe they'd actually make me healthier in moderation.

For what it's worth, I've never used one, however I've been contemplating it as my legs are fucking pale.

Wouldn't it be more practical to just go outside, especially at this time of year?

So you're suggesting nudity outside as a solution?

Don't I always?

Won't you experience some shrinkage in December?
 
tanning is retarded, cancer causing or not

Sure its nice to have some color.. naturally from the sun from the beach or something... but girls (and guidos) look awful with their super fake orange skin
 
Originally posted by: Specop 007
As deadly as mustard gas? Really? I mean, really?!

True story: Kaiser Wilhelm had actually contemplated lobbing tanning beds at the Allies but the bulbs were too expensive.
 
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: Specop 007
As deadly as mustard gas? Really? I mean, really?!

True story: Kaiser Wilhelm had actually contemplated lobbing tanning beds at the Allies but the bulbs were too expensive.

Not to mention the copper shortage, so they couldn't get extension cords that were long enough.
 
Back
Top