• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Report: North Korea preparing for missile test

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: rickn
Originally posted by: compuwiz1
I think this could get fun. They launch a missile, and the USA flexes a bit of muscle and blows it out of the sky. This could be precisely what is planned. I'm luvin it. 🙂

it would be something to see it on the 5'oclock news, a missile flying straight over Hawaii.

Wave to it everyone

It won't go to Hawaii. They'll fire one to Alaska first. 🙁
 
No, whoozer; Hawai'i is closer to NK. It's almost within the reach of their existing, proven platforms.

That said, yes, the will try to arc one over HI, or almost to CA, or to some closely corresponding area, because it is supposed to rattle some cages.

FWIW, previous post was a countdown in sino & pure Korean.
 
Breaking News via the wire from Reuters: South Korea reports that the North has just fueled the ICBM. Launch imminent with 48 hours!

If they do not launch it within 48 hours, the fuel will begin to corrode the fuel tank. And then they will have to remove the fuel.
 
Is it in range of a red state or blue state? That could effect the Whitehouse response.

Let me see.... what would Karl do????
 
Originally posted by: Duddy
Breaking News via the wire from Reuters: South Korea reports that the North has just fueled the ICBM. Launch imminent with 48 hours!

If they do not launch it within 48 hours, the fuel will begin to corrode the fuel tank. And then they will have to remove the fuel.

Yep, front page breaking News all over the place.

Perfect diversion for the slumping Repubicans.

6-19-2006 N.Korea appears close to testing missile

President Bush, national security adviser Stephen Hadley and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have been in contact with more than a dozen countries and communicated with North Korea through the U.N. representative, Snow said.

"If they go ahead with a test, then we will have to respond properly and appropriately at the time," Snow told CNN's "Late Edition."

Japan's largest newspaper, Yomiuri, reported Sunday that U.S. and Japanese officials have confirmed that North Korea has assembled what is believed to be a Taepodong-2, with two stages at the launch site, based on photos from satellites.

The newspaper and South Korea's Yonhap news agency carried similar reports citing unidentified U.S. and diplomatic officials saying North Korea also may have begun fueling the missile.
===========================================
Cool 😎

It's been a while since we lit up some Nukes :thumbsup:
 
The world would be bettter off without North Korea.. so.. bye bye...

Mr Illllllll is just upset that Iran has been stealing all of the headlines lately... When it comes to people like Mr. Ill.. I don't see anything wrong with targeted assassination.
 
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: Tom
spy photo

I'd laugh if I didn't live A LOT closer to NK than you... at a crossroads where two strategic military bases, an over the horizon radar station and the pipeline meet.

Well making light will help you deal with it. I live 15 miles from a nuclear assembly plant, and we have learned to laugh about it. The russians have missiles with Amarillo's name on them, literally. They showed them on 60 Minutes, years ago.
 
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Harvey
If they launch it over international waters, we could always use it as a target to test any missile interception systems we may have.

I say if they launch it into international waters that we blow the site up that it was launched from and everything else within about a 1mile radius

Then we get to see Seoul leveled in a couple of hours. Good plan.
 
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
This will give our anti-ICBM's some great target practice.


I kinda doubt that,
the system has really poor track record, so I doubt pentagon would take the risk. If the system fails, it would be a huge embarrasment.
 
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
This will give our anti-ICBM's some great target practice.


I kinda doubt that,
the system has really poor track record, so I doubt pentagon would take the risk. If the system fails, it would be a huge embarrasment.


Weather it fails or not I dont think anybody would hear about it
I doubt NK has the capability to detect a missile start an ocean away - nor the destruction of their own missile.
 
Originally posted by: B00ne
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
This will give our anti-ICBM's some great target practice.


I kinda doubt that,
the system has really poor track record, so I doubt pentagon would take the risk. If the system fails, it would be a huge embarrasment.


Weather it fails or not I dont think anybody would hear about it
I doubt NK has the capability to detect a missile start an ocean away - nor the destruction of their own missile.

Too many people, including defense contractors and civilians, would know about the operational status of the interceptor, and the prepping of it for launch. And someone would eventually talk...and it if DIDN'T hit and be announced as such, then everyone would know it failed...

Future Shock
 
Originally posted by: Future Shock
Originally posted by: B00ne
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
This will give our anti-ICBM's some great target practice.


I kinda doubt that,
the system has really poor track record, so I doubt pentagon would take the risk. If the system fails, it would be a huge embarrasment.


Weather it fails or not I dont think anybody would hear about it
I doubt NK has the capability to detect a missile start an ocean away - nor the destruction of their own missile.

Too many people, including defense contractors and civilians, would know about the operational status of the interceptor, and the prepping of it for launch. And someone would eventually talk...and it if DIDN'T hit and be announced as such, then everyone would know it failed...

Future Shock

Isn't it a shame that their is such a stigma attached to failure today that it is better not to even try.
 
Originally posted by: 1prophet
Originally posted by: Future Shock
Originally posted by: B00ne
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
This will give our anti-ICBM's some great target practice.


I kinda doubt that,
the system has really poor track record, so I doubt pentagon would take the risk. If the system fails, it would be a huge embarrasment.


Weather it fails or not I dont think anybody would hear about it
I doubt NK has the capability to detect a missile start an ocean away - nor the destruction of their own missile.

Too many people, including defense contractors and civilians, would know about the operational status of the interceptor, and the prepping of it for launch. And someone would eventually talk...and it if DIDN'T hit and be announced as such, then everyone would know it failed...

Future Shock

Isn't it a shame that their is such a stigma attached to failure today that it is better not to even try.


The thing about failure is the certain existence of its possibility.

It's like what Lincoln said, It's better to stay silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. Same with our bogus missle-defense. It hasn't been tried in the real world, so a missle could be intercepted, which would mean bad bad news for the offending country. Most countries don't take this risk. If our system is proven to fail, however, we are in a much much weaker position.
 
North Korea is only a threat to itself.

The reason ? China. It is in China's interest if NK is annoying to the USA, Japan, and S Korea. It is not in China's interest for NK to be an actual threat, or actually engage any of those countries.

So even if NK was a military threat, China would crush them faster than the USA could.
 
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Harvey
If they launch it over international waters, we could always use it as a target to test any missile interception systems we may have.

I say if they launch it into international waters that we blow the site up that it was launched from and everything else within about a 1mile radius

On what grounds? We have launched buttloads of test missiles over international waters. So have dozens of other nations. There is nothing even remotely illegal about a nation test firing equipment over open ocean.
If NK puts a missile over Japan, or Taiwan or someone else, that would be a violation which deserved some sort of response.
 
Originally posted by: sadguyO-I-L

OK, this might be tough for you to understand seeing as how I'm quite sure that you just crawled out from under a rock, but try and keep up, I'll try to keep it simple...


I paid 3.10 per gallon yesterday for low grade 87 octane fuel. We have been in Iraq for several years and prices have only gotten worse. If we were there for O-I-L as you claim, why have prices escalated? Would not they drop down because we are monopolizing the oil and keeping it here for us?

Now, re-read that slowly, take a breath and read it one more time. Allow yourself a minute for each sentence to take root. Allow your mind to see the truth. We aren't there for oil you dolt.

Go eat a soy burger.

Nice work.

 
Originally posted by: Modular
Originally posted by: sadguyO-I-L

OK, this might be tough for you to understand seeing as how I'm quite sure that you just crawled out from under a rock, but try and keep up, I'll try to keep it simple...


I paid 3.10 per gallon yesterday for low grade 87 octane fuel. We have been in Iraq for several years and prices have only gotten worse. If we were there for O-I-L as you claim, why have prices escalated? Would not they drop down because we are monopolizing the oil and keeping it here for us?
Hey, maybe gas would be even more expensive now had we not invaded Iraq. Ever think of that possibility?
 
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Harvey
If they launch it over international waters, we could always use it as a target to test any missile interception systems we may have.

I say if they launch it into international waters that we blow the site up that it was launched from and everything else within about a 1mile radius

On what grounds? We have launched buttloads of test missiles over international waters. So have dozens of other nations. There is nothing even remotely illegal about a nation test firing equipment over open ocean.
If NK puts a missile over Japan, or Taiwan or someone else, that would be a violation which deserved some sort of response.

How can North Korea fire a missile over open ocean without going over another country
 
Originally posted by: Modular
Originally posted by: sadguyO-I-L

I paid 3.10 per gallon yesterday for low grade 87 octane fuel.

We have been in Iraq for several years and prices have only gotten worse.

If we were there for O-I-L as you claim, why have prices escalated?

Would not they drop down because we are monopolizing the oil and keeping it here for us?
Hello McFly anybody home??? 😕

Have you not seen the record profits by the Oil Companies???

Have you not seen that Oil Inventories are at 8 yr record highs???

You're being reamed.

Enjoy
 
Back
Top