Looks like Kim Yong-Il had a little too much to drink at his party the other night: NKorea threatens to 'wipe out' US forces in case of war - KCNA
Nate
Nate
Originally posted by: conehead433
But they don't have any oil. Too bad.
Originally posted by: rickn
Originally posted by: compuwiz1
I think this could get fun. They launch a missile, and the USA flexes a bit of muscle and blows it out of the sky. This could be precisely what is planned. I'm luvin it. 🙂
it would be something to see it on the 5'oclock news, a missile flying straight over Hawaii.
Wave to it everyone
Originally posted by: Duddy
Breaking News via the wire from Reuters: South Korea reports that the North has just fueled the ICBM. Launch imminent with 48 hours!
If they do not launch it within 48 hours, the fuel will begin to corrode the fuel tank. And then they will have to remove the fuel.
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: Tom
spy photo
I'd laugh if I didn't live A LOT closer to NK than you... at a crossroads where two strategic military bases, an over the horizon radar station and the pipeline meet.
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Harvey
If they launch it over international waters, we could always use it as a target to test any missile interception systems we may have.
I say if they launch it into international waters that we blow the site up that it was launched from and everything else within about a 1mile radius
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
This will give our anti-ICBM's some great target practice.
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
This will give our anti-ICBM's some great target practice.
I kinda doubt that,
the system has really poor track record, so I doubt pentagon would take the risk. If the system fails, it would be a huge embarrasment.
Originally posted by: B00ne
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
This will give our anti-ICBM's some great target practice.
I kinda doubt that,
the system has really poor track record, so I doubt pentagon would take the risk. If the system fails, it would be a huge embarrasment.
Weather it fails or not I dont think anybody would hear about it
I doubt NK has the capability to detect a missile start an ocean away - nor the destruction of their own missile.
Originally posted by: Future Shock
Originally posted by: B00ne
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
This will give our anti-ICBM's some great target practice.
I kinda doubt that,
the system has really poor track record, so I doubt pentagon would take the risk. If the system fails, it would be a huge embarrasment.
Weather it fails or not I dont think anybody would hear about it
I doubt NK has the capability to detect a missile start an ocean away - nor the destruction of their own missile.
Too many people, including defense contractors and civilians, would know about the operational status of the interceptor, and the prepping of it for launch. And someone would eventually talk...and it if DIDN'T hit and be announced as such, then everyone would know it failed...
Future Shock
Originally posted by: 1prophet
Originally posted by: Future Shock
Originally posted by: B00ne
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
This will give our anti-ICBM's some great target practice.
I kinda doubt that,
the system has really poor track record, so I doubt pentagon would take the risk. If the system fails, it would be a huge embarrasment.
Weather it fails or not I dont think anybody would hear about it
I doubt NK has the capability to detect a missile start an ocean away - nor the destruction of their own missile.
Too many people, including defense contractors and civilians, would know about the operational status of the interceptor, and the prepping of it for launch. And someone would eventually talk...and it if DIDN'T hit and be announced as such, then everyone would know it failed...
Future Shock
Isn't it a shame that their is such a stigma attached to failure today that it is better not to even try.
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Harvey
If they launch it over international waters, we could always use it as a target to test any missile interception systems we may have.
I say if they launch it into international waters that we blow the site up that it was launched from and everything else within about a 1mile radius
Originally posted by: sadguyO-I-L
Hey, maybe gas would be even more expensive now had we not invaded Iraq. Ever think of that possibility?Originally posted by: Modular
Originally posted by: sadguyO-I-L
OK, this might be tough for you to understand seeing as how I'm quite sure that you just crawled out from under a rock, but try and keep up, I'll try to keep it simple...
I paid 3.10 per gallon yesterday for low grade 87 octane fuel. We have been in Iraq for several years and prices have only gotten worse. If we were there for O-I-L as you claim, why have prices escalated? Would not they drop down because we are monopolizing the oil and keeping it here for us?
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Harvey
If they launch it over international waters, we could always use it as a target to test any missile interception systems we may have.
I say if they launch it into international waters that we blow the site up that it was launched from and everything else within about a 1mile radius
On what grounds? We have launched buttloads of test missiles over international waters. So have dozens of other nations. There is nothing even remotely illegal about a nation test firing equipment over open ocean.
If NK puts a missile over Japan, or Taiwan or someone else, that would be a violation which deserved some sort of response.
Hello McFly anybody home??? 😕Originally posted by: Modular
Originally posted by: sadguyO-I-L
I paid 3.10 per gallon yesterday for low grade 87 octane fuel.
We have been in Iraq for several years and prices have only gotten worse.
If we were there for O-I-L as you claim, why have prices escalated?
Would not they drop down because we are monopolizing the oil and keeping it here for us?