- Jun 19, 2000
- 18,883
- 641
- 126
Oh Ann, your snarky form of sarcasm appeals to me on so many levels.
Repeal the 26th Amendment!
I'm willing to go with either-or but not all.
Repeal the 26th Amendment!
I like it. But we really need to strengthen the laws concerning deployed military voting. Too many states took advantage of a loophole in the law.Clinton only threatened to wreck the health care system; Obama actually did it. We must repeal the 26th Amendment.
Adopted in 1971 at the tail end of the Worst Generation's anti-war protests, the argument for allowing children to vote was that 18-year-olds could drink and be conscripted into the military, so they ought to be allowed to vote.
But 18-year-olds aren't allowed to drink anymore. We no longer have a draft. In fact, while repealing the 26th Amendment, we ought to add a separate right to vote for members of the military, irrespective of age.
As we have learned from ObamaCare, young people are not considered adults until age 26, at which point they are finally forced to get off their parents' health care plans. The old motto was "Old enough to fight, old enough to vote." The new motto is: "Not old enough to buy your own health insurance, not old enough to vote."
Ah-hah! So there is actual science behind mandating that children be allowed to remain on their parents' health insurance. She's right, the voting age must be raised. We can't have individuals who statistically aren't capable of making rational, informed decisions voting. At least not along with illegals and convicted felons.Brain research in the last five years at Dartmouth and elsewhere has shown that human brains are not fully developed until age 25 and are particularly deficient in their frontal lobes, which control decision-making, rational thinking, judgment, the ability to plan ahead and to resist impulses.
I'm willing to go with either-or but not all.
