Originally posted by: MaxDSP
Yes, yes it is.
This first post brought to you by a feeling of agreement.
Originally posted by: MaxDSP
Yes, yes it is.
Originally posted by: RossMAN
What are the pro's and con's of RD vs VNC?
Here's a recap of my situation:
1 Windows XP Home and 1 Windows XP Pro machine
Want to be able to control the XP Pro machine via WiFi or through the intarweb
Free or cheap
That's about it![]()
Originally posted by: fs5
Originally posted by: RossMAN
What are the pro's and con's of RD vs VNC?
Here's a recap of my situation:
1 Windows XP Home and 1 Windows XP Pro machine
Want to be able to control the XP Pro machine via WiFi or through the intarweb
Free or cheap
That's about it![]()
I'd go with RD because it's built into XP. no need to install anything on the xp pro machine. As for bandwidth between the two, I think RD uses less.
I'm connecting to my home PC (with only 30kb/s upload speed) with 1280x1024x16 and it's pretty zippy. Even get sound!
Both are Rossman friendly though (ie FREE!)
Originally posted by: Pill
Originally posted by: fs5
Originally posted by: RossMAN
What are the pro's and con's of RD vs VNC?
Here's a recap of my situation:
1 Windows XP Home and 1 Windows XP Pro machine
Want to be able to control the XP Pro machine via WiFi or through the intarweb
Free or cheap
That's about it![]()
I'd go with RD because it's built into XP. no need to install anything on the xp pro machine. As for bandwidth between the two, I think RD uses less.
I'm connecting to my home PC (with only 30kb/s upload speed) with 1280x1024x16 and it's pretty zippy. Even get sound!
Both are Rossman friendly though (ie FREE!)
Yup. Remote Desktop is definitely quicker over almost any network lines. I've used Remote Desktop at home (VPN) and at work, and it's sooo much faster than VNC.
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Originally posted by: Pill
Originally posted by: fs5
Originally posted by: RossMAN
What are the pro's and con's of RD vs VNC?
Here's a recap of my situation:
1 Windows XP Home and 1 Windows XP Pro machine
Want to be able to control the XP Pro machine via WiFi or through the intarweb
Free or cheap
That's about it![]()
I'd go with RD because it's built into XP. no need to install anything on the xp pro machine. As for bandwidth between the two, I think RD uses less.
I'm connecting to my home PC (with only 30kb/s upload speed) with 1280x1024x16 and it's pretty zippy. Even get sound!
Both are Rossman friendly though (ie FREE!)
Yup. Remote Desktop is definitely quicker over almost any network lines. I've used Remote Desktop at home (VPN) and at work, and it's sooo much faster than VNC.
Thanks for the info
If I want to be able to access RD outside my local network do I need to open any ports on our WAP?
Originally posted by: Syringer
How do you forward a port?
And after you do that you just type in the comp name and it'll connect?
Say I'm in a computer lab then, would I have to find out the IP of the computer at the lab and then forward it to that IP?
Originally posted by: Syringer
How do you forward a port?
And after you do that you just type in the comp name and it'll connect?
Say I'm in a computer lab then, would I have to find out the IP of the computer at the lab and then forward it to that IP?
Remote Desktop is rather user friendly, and nearly IdiotProof?. Have used both, and would say Ultr@ is hands down a better interface to deal with, and is absolutely faster when used in conjunction with the Mirror Driver. Client side, it can be used from any machine that runs Java.Originally posted by: RossMAN
What are the pro's and con's of RD vs VNC?
Here's a recap of my situation:
1 Windows XP Home and 1 Windows XP Pro machine
Want to be able to control the XP Pro machine via WiFi or through the intarweb
Free or cheap
That's about it![]()
More connection options (format, encoding, encryption, etc - really allows for a tailored connection, if one's needs are specific), built-in FTP (very nice for machines not in the same workgroup/domain), built-in chat client (I tend not to use it, but certainly it could be useful), optional viewing mode (scaling is nice), certainly more port options (nice for more than one machine in a given network), and a better user interface.Originally posted by: RossMAN
They are more robust, how?
With Remote Desktop, the Xp Home machine could only be used as a client (in other words, can only be used to access Xp Professional machines).Originally posted by: RossMAN
How would it work if I wanted to bring my wife's XP Home PC into the mix?
Originally posted by: Syringer
How do you forward a port?
And after you do that you just type in the comp name and it'll connect?
Say I'm in a computer lab then, would I have to find out the IP of the computer at the lab and then forward it to that IP?
Originally posted by: archcommus
Cool stuff, everyone. It's fun to learn about a whole new realm of computer things that you never even explorered or thought about before. I never gave RD a second thought and now I'm seeing all its possibilities!
I really only have two situations to use this: to connect to my computer from my girlfriend's house, and once I'm in school in the fall, to connect to my dad's computer at home from school (because I know he'll be needing help with things). All of these computers will be using XP Pro, so it seems RD is definitely the way to go for me.
So a VPN must be set up first? Is this something that's permanent or done every time prior to creating an RDC? What is the other way to do it besides IE, and is it better or worse?
Sorry for all the Qs.
This article should get you started.Originally posted by: archcommus
So a VPN must be set up first? Is this something that's permanent or done every time prior to creating an RDC? What is the other way to do it besides IE, and is it better or worse?