So we need to have threads where we agree that bad things are bad? That doesn't make much sense to me. It felt to me like the purpose of the thread was to highlight the monstrousness of the crime, and associate that monstrousness with the people that are supporting him.
Thus my point about the lack of remorse for the carnage in Yemen. Your characterization of the actors as "remorseful" was unfair and telling. Because surely non-monsters would show remorse.
So if the Jordanians supporting a child murderer is monstrous, and not expressing any remorse after killing innocent men, women, and children is also monstrous, why do we have a thread for one and not for the other?
I think it's actually helpful for this community to participate in threads that we can agree on. That's my opinion, but I can't see a down side to 99% partisan opposition being flavored with 1% agreement being bad.
Just to be clear, are you talking about remorse by the public (those who even pay attention) or by the ones committing the attack? Regardless, if anyone lacks remorse over them, then that person is garbage.
Finally, I don't know why we have some thread topics and not others. I would imagine that people are too burnt out on trolls/idiots to post as much as they used to. The liberal side here is poisoned by idiots who think they've gained superior intelligence through simply being a part of that side of the isle, and the conservative side has too many brietbart clones drowning out independent thought.
How can people expect discourse when theu have to speak over echobots and lolwuts (not the member lolwut).