Remember when Apple said people didn't want huge 4in+ phones?

Oct 25, 2006
11,036
11
91
I don't know why people think a 4.3 inch phone is hard to carry around at all. I carry about scientific calculators in my pocket just fine as well as my Droid X. Are skinny jeans really that popular or something?

I can't live without the bigger screen. Screw Pixel Density when I have my 4.3 inch screen. I would even love a 4.5 in screen.
 

dguy6789

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2002
8,558
3
76
On my second 4.3 inch screen phone now. Don't think I can ever go back, it's so much more pleasant to use than a smaller screen device.
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
63
91
And I remember every fucking apple fanboy in here defended that statement. And they still won't let it go.
 

s44

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2006
9,427
16
81
And I remember every fucking apple fanboy in here defended that statement. And they still won't let it go.
I'm wondering what the official walkback is going to be when the big iPhone5 hits.

(And what about "Retina"? Or is Apple planning on going all FRAGMENT with 720p or something...)
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,472
7,707
136
I'm wondering what the official walkback is going to be when the big iPhone5 hits.

(And what about "Retina"? Or is Apple planning on going all FRAGMENT with 720p or something...)

I think they're just making the screen larger while keeping the device the same size. Even with that change they'd still be at about ~290 ppi, which isn't too shabby.
 

MrX8503

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2005
4,529
0
0
I'm wondering what the official walkback is going to be when the big iPhone5 hits.

(And what about "Retina"? Or is Apple planning on going all FRAGMENT with 720p or something...)

Steve never said specifically what size was considered "big". At the time of his statement the largest phone was a 4.3" device. If the iPhone 5 is 4" then his statement still holds true, but if it turns out to be 4.3", then he was wrong.

An iPhone with a 4" screen with the iPad's resolution of 1024 actually turns out to be 300+ dpi. This would cut down on fragmentation and while still being able to increase the iPhone's screen real estate and resolution.

I would love a 4.3" as its awesome to use, but I also love the retina display, so we can't win em all. Mark my words though, the first to have a 4" or 4.3" retina display will be the king of smartphone displays.
 

alent1234

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,915
0
0
I'm wondering what the official walkback is going to be when the big iPhone5 hits.

(And what about "Retina"? Or is Apple planning on going all FRAGMENT with 720p or something...)

there won't be any, he'll introduce the new phone and whatever he said before won't be mentioned except by bloggers who need something to write about
 

cronos

Diamond Member
Nov 7, 2001
9,380
26
101
i went from 3.2 to 4.3 and ill never have one less than 4" again

I went from 2.5" to 5" and it hurts me that I'll eventually have to settle for something around 4.5" (apparently nobody else is interested in making a 5" anymore)


(there's a couple of jokes in there somewhere :D)
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
I'll defend it from a marketing perspective. Apple doesn't offer a 4.3" phone. Therefore no one wants one, at least that's what I would also say if it were my product.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,472
7,707
136
Steve never said specifically what size was considered "big". At the time of his statement the largest phone was a 4.3" device. If the iPhone 5 is 4" then his statement still holds true, but if it turns out to be 4.3", then he was wrong.

I think Jobs's remarks were most likely directed at the physical size of the devices. A few people have already figured out that you can put a 4" screen on a device the size of the iPhone without actually making the device larger. If you look at it that way, Apple might be able to have their cake and eat it too.

An iPhone with a 4" screen with the iPad's resolution of 1024 actually turns out to be 300+ dpi. This would cut down on fragmentation and while still being able to increase the iPhone's screen real estate and resolution.

I would love a 4.3" as its awesome to use, but I also love the retina display, so we can't win em all. Mark my words though, the first to have a 4" or 4.3" retina display will be the king of smartphone displays.

The iPad has a different aspect ratio than the iPhone, so simply using it's resolution would change the device. It would make it a look a lot fatter.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
For smartphone, here is how I'd pick the right size: when holding in hand, thumb should reach the furthest upper corner without moving phone in hand. I'd say 4" is the limit for me.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
I'll defend it from a marketing perspective. Apple doesn't offer a 4.3" phone. Therefore no one wants one, at least that's what I would also say if it were my product.

If you have a 4.3in screen, you don't have an iPhone. :p

*shameless poke at Apple's BS ads.*
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,062
881
126
Love the 4" screen on my Vibrant. 4.3 or 4.5 would be nice if it is in the same form factor. But I think only apple has room on their form factor to hit 4" max.
 

CurseTheSky

Diamond Member
Oct 21, 2006
5,401
2
0
I have a Droid X for my personal phone, and an HTC Freestyle for my work phone. Out of the two, I prefer the Freestyle's overall size. It's a bit smaller than I'd prefer, but the Droid X is just way too massive, especially with tablets becoming so popular.

IMO, the Samsung Fascinate is right around the perfect size.