Remember the company that fired the smokers

NissanGurl

Golden Member
Sep 4, 2003
1,111
0
0
Searched and didn't see any threads for it.

That same company that fired people for smoking is looking at the fatties now. I don't think they are firing people as apparently obesity is covered in the same way AIDS is according to the article.

Text

What do you predict their next target is....those that watch too much pron :shocked:
 

RaDragon

Diamond Member
May 23, 2000
4,123
1
71
At first I thought that was a foreign company. I didn't realize it was in the USA! :Q
 

radioouman

Diamond Member
Nov 4, 2002
8,632
0
0
I don't see why we don't have more thin, non-smokers anyway. Obviously people don't care about their health.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,240
19,135
146
This has been hashed out already in the other thread.

The simple fact is, employers have ALWAYS had the legal right to do things like this. Most choose not to, and have not done this because there is no profit in it.

This is not something new, just something stupid by one isolated employer.
 

dabuddha

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
19,579
17
81
But the company isn't planning to fire employees for unhealthy lifestyle choices, according to a Weyco news release.

"Anyone concerned about limiting employers' rights to specify terms of employment should know that federal law protects people with conditions like obesity, alcoholism and AIDS. But there's no right to indulge in tobacco," the news release said.


An official of the company -- which administers health benefits -- estimated that 18 to 20 of its 200 employees were smokers when the policy was first announced in 2003. As many as 14 of them quit smoking before the policy went into effect.
 

NissanGurl

Golden Member
Sep 4, 2003
1,111
0
0
Originally posted by: Amused
This has been hashed out already in the other thread.

The simple fact is, employers have ALWAYS had the legal right to do things like this. Most choose not to, and have not done this because there is no profit in it.

This is not something new, just something stupid by one isolated employer.


I realize it was all already hashed out. My point was that they were actually taking it to the next level with the fat thing. Although I like how they handled this better, with incentives rather that threats.
 

dabuddha

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
19,579
17
81
Originally posted by: NissanGurl
Originally posted by: Amused
This has been hashed out already in the other thread.

The simple fact is, employers have ALWAYS had the legal right to do things like this. Most choose not to, and have not done this because there is no profit in it.

This is not something new, just something stupid by one isolated employer.


I realize it was all already hashed out. My point was that they were actually taking it to the next level with the fat thing. Although I like how they handled this better, with incentives rather that threats.

Which proves that all the whining naysayers in the other thread where wrong.
 

Kyteland

Diamond Member
Dec 30, 2002
5,747
1
81
My company has a similar policy. It is called the Wellness Reimbursement Plan. They will pay half of all expenses related to gym memberships, health classes, weight loss programs, and costs related to quitting smoking.

There is no requirement to use the program and they will not fire you for being fat. It is just an added benefit because healthy workers are generally more productive.
 

Hammer

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
13,217
1
81
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
They should get rid of women next.

only unattractive ones. but with fatties and smokers gone, they're already in decent shape. ;)
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,410
18,370
136
I can't believe the company was already charging the smokers $50 per month, and then still fired them.
 

Electric Amish

Elite Member
Oct 11, 1999
23,578
1
0
Originally posted by: radioouman
I don't see why we don't have more thin, non-smokers anyway. Obviously people don't care about their health.

It's people like you that causes sh!t like this to happen. Why can't you just let people alone so they can live their lives however they please?
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: puffff
people who drink alcohol are next i bet

Naw, what they'll do is keep the people who drink the recommended glass of wine a day or so, and fire anyone who drinks more or less.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,410
18,370
136
They should probably go ahead and start requiring cholesterol tests for all employees as well, and fire anyone that doesn't submit, or has an unacceptable result. After all, you can be thin and still have high cholesterol.