- Apr 17, 2003
- 37,622
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: shady06
the resurrection?
Yes and no. While it's true that the early church did set up the "official" days to correspond with many pre-existing pagan ceremonies (and it's also true that many pagan symbols became "Christianized"), the members of the early church still did celebrate those holidays, just not necessarily on the same days (originally) as the pagan holidays.Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Easter was yet another pagan holiday co-opted by the early Church to spread adoption of Christianity.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Yes and no. While it's true that the early church did set up the "official" days to correspond with many pre-existing pagan ceremonies (and it's also true that many pagan symbols became "Christianized"), the members of the early church still did celebrate those holidays, just not necessarily on the same days (originally) as the pagan holidays.Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Easter was yet another pagan holiday co-opted by the early Church to spread adoption of Christianity.
ZV
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Yes and no. While it's true that the early church did set up the "official" days to correspond with many pre-existing pagan ceremonies (and it's also true that many pagan symbols became "Christianized"), the members of the early church still did celebrate those holidays, just not necessarily on the same days (originally) as the pagan holidays.Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Easter was yet another pagan holiday co-opted by the early Church to spread adoption of Christianity.
ZV
I just think it's a cheap tactic. Personally, I believe that if a holiday has real significance, it should be celebrated on the actual day of the occurrence that is being observed. I mean this not just in a religious way. Before we had Presidents' Day, we had Washington's Birthday, and Washington's Birthday (observed). I just don't feel right with that.
I can see where you're coming from, but that's never been a real issue to me. It's just a difference in personality I guess, but I really don't see why the time of the remembrance matters. To me it's the act of remembrance itself that is important. But again, that's just me.Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Personally, I believe that if a holiday has real significance, it should be celebrated on the actual day of the occurrence that is being observed. I mean this not just in a religious way. Before we had Presidents' Day, we had Washington's Birthday, and Washington's Birthday (observed). I just don't feel right with that.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
I can see where you're coming from, but that's never been a real issue to me. It's just a difference in personality I guess, but I really don't see why the time of the remembrance matters. To me it's the act of remembrance itself that is important. But again, that's just me.Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Personally, I believe that if a holiday has real significance, it should be celebrated on the actual day of the occurrence that is being observed. I mean this not just in a religious way. Before we had Presidents' Day, we had Washington's Birthday, and Washington's Birthday (observed). I just don't feel right with that.
ZV
Originally posted by: Sideswipe001
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
I can see where you're coming from, but that's never been a real issue to me. It's just a difference in personality I guess, but I really don't see why the time of the remembrance matters. To me it's the act of remembrance itself that is important. But again, that's just me.Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Personally, I believe that if a holiday has real significance, it should be celebrated on the actual day of the occurrence that is being observed. I mean this not just in a religious way. Before we had Presidents' Day, we had Washington's Birthday, and Washington's Birthday (observed). I just don't feel right with that.
ZV
I have to agree. Does everyone think Christ was born on December 25? Please. What matters is that you *do* remember. And yes, it's been paganized and commercialized to death. But what matters is what is in the heart of the people celebrating.
I agree with you on a technical level. However, simply because some of the ritualized traditions have their origins in pagan observances (e.g. the Christmas tree and the Easter egg) doesn't necessarily have to cheapen the remembrance. The Christmas tree, even in the pagan services, still represented everlasting life, and the Easter egg was a symbol of re-birth and renewal even in its pagan interpretation.Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Calling Easter and Christmas "paganized" is wrong. They are pagan holidays that were "Christianized". You're right, however, about them being commercialized to death...Originally posted by: Sideswipe001
I have to agree. Does everyone think Christ was born on December 25? Please. What matters is that you *do* remember. And yes, it's been paganized and commercialized to death. But what matters is what is in the heart of the people celebrating.Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
I can see where you're coming from, but that's never been a real issue to me. It's just a difference in personality I guess, but I really don't see why the time of the remembrance matters. To me it's the act of remembrance itself that is important. But again, that's just me.Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Personally, I believe that if a holiday has real significance, it should be celebrated on the actual day of the occurrence that is being observed. I mean this not just in a religious way. Before we had Presidents' Day, we had Washington's Birthday, and Washington's Birthday (observed). I just don't feel right with that.
ZV
