• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Refugee Stabs Swedish Woman to Death

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Keep screaming in terror about the sky falling, it's what makes you a good, scared faithful conservative.

Run!

Hide!

Shit the bed, coward.

Mooselmans are comin'!

Keep defending evil people (as long as they aren't white males) or else you might be branded a racist.
 
Sweden's ever broadening legal definition of what constitutes as rape is probably a factor. For example, any intoxication or influence of drugs legally removes ability to consent, while in countries like America you have to be more thoroughly incapacitated. You can also be legally convicted of rape if the court is convinced that you put the person in a "particularly vulnerable situation."

Wasn't kiddie porn legal there until the mid-90s? That is a big swing in the other direction. Seems like they could find a happy middle ground.
 
Keep defending evil people (as long as they aren't white males) or else you might be branded a racist.
What makes you so hilariously stupid is that you make hilariously stupid claims, such that I am defending "evil people", or advocating for rape.

All I'm doing is not demonizing 1.3 Billion people while screaming that I'm a terrified, scared little coward.

So, you go ahead and keep on keepin' on with the terrified, scared cowardice, and I'll continue not supporting the demonization of 1.3 Billion people.

Again, being scared and demonizing "others" is what makes you such a good conservative. That, and lying about what your political opponents actually stand for. That's a huge part of being a good right-wing authoritarian in search of a Strongman who will make everything great again.

Have a great day, lying coward!
 
Although there has been a Muslim population in Sweden for a very long time, the main immigration started in the 60's
There are over a half million Muslims in Sweden mostly from the Middle East and Northern Africa
Out of those only 110,000 are members of a congregation and only 25,000 actively practice
I can see these incidents in Sweden etc terrorize a lot of Americans, but really the Swedes are pretty good at handling these things

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden
 
Last edited:
What makes you so hilariously stupid is that you make hilariously stupid claims, such that I am defending "evil people", or advocating for rape.

All I'm doing is not demonizing 1.3 Billion people while screaming that I'm a terrified, scared little coward.

So, you go ahead and keep on keepin' on with the terrified, scared cowardice, and I'll continue not supporting the demonization of 1.3 Billion people.

Again, being scared and demonizing "others" is what makes you such a good conservative. That, and lying about what your political opponents actually stand for. That's a huge part of being a good right-wing authoritarian in search of a Strongman who will make everything great again.

Have a great day, lying coward!


BRA-VO!
icDAkh.jpg
 
Keep advocating for rapists, and murderers, terrorists etc, its what makes you a good faithful liberal.

Sadly liberals don't even need to advocate.. we know already white males are rapists, murderers and terrorists.

Example of Rape: numerous university rapes
Example of Murder: Charleston Church Massacre
Example of Terrorists: Planned Parenthood Shooting, Oklahoma City Bombing

I'm with you.. kick these fuckers out of America.
 
Last edited:
Question for you, what's the point in posting about every crime that a refugee commits? Can you point to some rational conclusion that could be drawn by a set of anecdotes like that?

What's the point in posting every act of police brutality? Some people hate cops. I hate Muslims. What are ya gonna do?
 
Sweden's ever broadening legal definition of what constitutes as rape is probably a factor. For example, any intoxication or influence of drugs legally removes ability to consent, while in countries like America you have to be more thoroughly incapacitated. You can also be legally convicted of rape if the court is convinced that you put the person in a "particularly vulnerable situation."

Their maximum sentence of 6 years might make them more willing to have such a broad definition.

I think you're right though that immigrants in Sweden are much more likely to receive rape convictions. Stats show that people from North Africa, Iraq, and Italy (???) are over 10 times more likely.

Oh, I'm definitely not saying to compare Sweden's rape rate with, say, South Africa's. It's much broader, and graphs show that there was a sudden massive boost in the numbers whenever it was (1998 or so iirc) that they broadened the definition of rape. Even that aside, the general trend has been strongly upwards, unlike the USA or many Western/Northern European nations that have been flat or negative.

Example of Rape: numerous university rapes

Will you please stop citing this bullshit statistic over and over, even after you've been corrected on it multiple times? You're trolling at this point to compare that with Sweden's problem.
 
What makes you so hilariously stupid is that you make hilariously stupid claims, such that I am defending "evil people", or advocating for rape.

All I'm doing is not demonizing 1.3 Billion people while screaming that I'm a terrified, scared little coward.

So, you go ahead and keep on keepin' on with the terrified, scared cowardice, and I'll continue not supporting the demonization of 1.3 Billion people.

Again, being scared and demonizing "others" is what makes you such a good conservative. That, and lying about what your political opponents actually stand for. That's a huge part of being a good right-wing authoritarian in search of a Strongman who will make everything great again.

Have a great day, lying coward!

I hope Trump gets elected and unleashes the dogs of war. I can see the headlines now, "UN Charges United States with War Crimes, President Trump kicks them out of New York." 😀

Though realistically I know that both Trump and Clinton are far, far more hawkish than Obama, so the War on Islam will escalate no matter who wins the next presidential election.
 
Question for you, what's the point in posting about every crime that a refugee commits? Can you point to some rational conclusion that could be drawn by a set of anecdotes like that?

A rational conclusion can certainly be drawn by these news items, although you'd refuse to accept the conclusion.

So why were you asking this question?
 
Oh, I'm definitely not saying to compare Sweden's rape rate with, say, South Africa's. It's much broader, and graphs show that there was a sudden massive boost in the numbers whenever it was (1998 or so iirc) that they broadened the definition of rape. Even that aside, the general trend has been strongly upwards, unlike the USA or many Western/Northern European nations that have been flat or negative.


You're never going to get them to admit that the Muslim immigrants are the problem. Sweden is deliberately obfuscating the fact by changing the data they collect. When it finally blows up, I wonder what they'll blame. Not enough tolerance?
 
You're never going to get them to admit that the Muslim immigrants are the problem. Sweden is deliberately obfuscating the fact by changing the data they collect. When it finally blows up, I wonder what they'll blame. Not enough tolerance?

This is already happening; I know people that blamed France's anti-burka laws as the primary reason behind the recent Paris attacks, for example. (Not to mention Charlie Hebdo or the Draw Mohammed convention).
 
This is already happening; I know people that blamed France's anti-burka laws as the primary reason behind the recent Paris attacks, for example. (Not to mention Charlie Hebdo or the Draw Mohammed convention).

I really don't think that France & Germany will go quietly into the night. There will be strong, nationalist backlash that liberals the world round will condemn. Eastern Europe is already changing politically, mobilizing their militaries and erecting walls & fences.

Somehow Denmark has managed to avoid much international criticism for their stance.
 
What conclusion can be drawn from a collection of anecdotes? That seems to be a pretty silly idea.

Seems to me you insist on calling these events "anecdotes", so that you can make some definitional justification to disregard these happenings as non-events or meaningless data in order to preempt conclusions that otherwise be derived. Perhaps if you, or someone you care about, were involved in one of these "anecdotes" you'd have a change of perspective.

What would people be drawing conclusions about? People are drawing conclusions about the subjects of these events, be they people, places, or ideologies. There seem to be many news stories lately with recurring patterns of violence specific to people of a certain geographic origin and/or a specific religion.

So what's up with you, anyway?
 
Seems to me you insist on calling these events "anecdotes", so that you can make some definitional justification to disregard these happenings as non-events or meaningless data in order to preempt conclusions that otherwise be derived. Perhaps if you, or someone you care about, were involved in one of these "anecdotes" you'd have a change of perspective.

What would people be drawing conclusions about? People are drawing conclusions about the subjects of these events, be they people, places, or ideologies. There seem to be many news stories lately with recurring patterns of violence specific to people of a certain geographic origin and/or a specific religion.

So what's up with you, anyway?

I mean they are anecdotes by definition.

So what conclusions are you drawing and why? This should be easy for you.
 
I mean they are anecdotes by definition.

So what conclusions are you drawing and why? This should be easy for you.

Yeah, every event you hear about and don't personally experience is an anecdote. Are we not supposed to ever draw conclusions about anything without personal experience or observation?
 
Although there has been a Muslim population in Sweden for a very long time, the main immigration started in the 60's
There are over a half million Muslims in Sweden mostly from the Middle East and Northern Africa
Out of those only 110,000 are members of a congregation and only 25,000 actively practice
I can see these incidents in Sweden etc terrorize a lot of Americans, but really the Swedes are pretty good at handling these things

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden

Yeah, they are doing a great job.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...igrant-teen-gangs-stealing-groping-girls.html
 
Yeah, every event you hear about and don't personally experience is an anecdote. Are we not supposed to ever draw conclusions about anything without personal experience or observation?

Why is it so hard for you to say what conclusions we should draw? You seem to think we should from these stories.
 
You can't be arsed to answer any questions, why should I?

I was asking the question to show you how silly it is to draw conclusions about large groups of people based on anecdotes. This is true for every population.

Now it's your turn! What conclusions should we draw about this large population from these anecdotes? 🙂
 
I was asking the question to show you how silly it is to draw conclusions about large groups of people based on anecdotes. This is true for every population.

Now it's your turn! What conclusions should we draw about this large population from these anecdotes? 🙂

I've already drawn my conclusions. Read them yourself. I trust everyone else can make up their own mind on the subject at hand.

Good luck trying to corral everyone into your perspective.
 
Back
Top