• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Reflecting gravity waves

Status
Not open for further replies.
Something sounds fishy about the article. How do they determine that the cooper pairs flow in a non geodesic motion if they cannot ever determine the position or trajectory of them in the first place?

When they state "42 orders of magnitude" they give no clue on what metric they are using. Are they measuring the brute "amount" of cooper pairs that followed non-geodesic motions? Are they measuring the changing electric fields?
 
Originally posted by: KIAman
Something sounds fishy about the article. How do they determine that the cooper pairs flow in a non geodesic motion if they cannot ever determine the position or trajectory of them in the first place?

When they state "42 orders of magnitude" they give no clue on what metric they are using. Are they measuring the brute "amount" of cooper pairs that followed non-geodesic motions? Are they measuring the changing electric fields?

That's one of the properties of being non-local AFAIK.

I believe they would be measuring the electric fields yes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top