Referendum to ban cell phone in a small BC town.

Number1

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,881
549
126
B.C. hamlet hopes to hush incessant cellphone chatter


VANCOUVER ? In a far-off Shangri-La pocket of British Columbia, a group of determined villagers is engaged in a titanic struggle to roll back the tide of communications progress that has swept over the planet in recent years.

Not all progress, mind you. New Denver, population 556, does have high-speed and wireless Internet service. But progress in the form of the ubiquitous cellphone.

A majority of residents doesn't want it, and they are fighting to keep telecommunications giant Telus from installing a transmission antenna to bring cellphone coverage to the small, lakeshore community.

While some worry about possible health hazards, villagers also espouse their deep love of peace and quiet.

?People get sick and tired of having conversations interrupted by someone picking up a beeping machine,? says New Denver's long-time mayor, Gary Wright. ?It's just another of those gizmos that change the way we act as human beings.?

The local chamber of commerce even trumpets the cellphone hush as a way to drum up business.

?When you come to visit you will be able to enjoy a holiday free of cellphone hassle,? reads the chamber's website.

It's not that we're backward, insists Bill Roberts of the Slocan Valley Economic Development Commission and the man responsible for the intriguing marketing come-on.

?But cellphones are a bane on our existence with their damn rings everywhere.?

In a referendum earlier this year, the village voted 117 to 110 against installation of a small Telus receiver just outside their community in the heart of the pristine Slocan Valley, about 100 kilometres northwest of Nelson.

Yet the torturously close vote showed sentiment is far from unanimous in New Denver, and there may be little the anti-cellphone faction can do to thwart Telus' plans.

?It seems that telecommunication companies can install anything they want anywhere, even though we, as a village, voted on it, and we don't want it,? Mr. Wright said. ?This is an issue of local control. We shouldn't have to defend what we decide.?

Telus can override municipal objections because transmission towers are under federal jurisdiction, controlled by Industry Canada.

So far, Telus has voluntarily halted construction. But the Vancouver-based corporation is getting frustrated, both by the delay and what the company says are wildly exaggerated health concerns over transmission waves from the antenna.

?Emotions are running high. We can't let the kind of misinformation out there sway our decision,? said Telus spokesman Shawn Hall.

Mr. Hall said Telus is responding to a strong demand for cellphone service by other villagers and residents of nearby communities Silverton and Roseberry.

?We are wanted. We didn't suddenly decide to bring this in just to make the community cranky,? he said.

The proposed $500,000 transmission antenna will be affixed to a CBC tower, about 300 metres from the home of 69-year-old Penny Bonnett. Fears about the impact on her health has her thinking about packing up and leaving an area she has lived in for 38 years.

?I started to do the research and I became quite horrified at some of the studies that have been done,? she said. ?I simply don't trust what Health Canada says. I've had it.?

Meanwhile, no one should be too surprised that New Denver is trying to resist the cellphone. Years ago, the village also turned its back on the costly lure of cable-TV service, opting instead to set up its own cable reception.

?We're independent thinkers here,? Mayor Wright said.

Mr. Roberts of the chamber of commerce said he doesn't mind that outsiders may shake their heads over what ?those idiots? are doing in New Denver.

?There are times,? he said, ?when I'm proud to be called an idiot.?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Like Mr Roberts is saying, I am shaking my head at their stupidity.
The text I bolded also illustrates how utterly clueless those people realy are.

:roll:
 

TwiceOver

Lifer
Dec 20, 2002
13,544
44
91
Only 556 residents? Tower is $500,000? Gonna take way to long to make that worth while. The town is saving the cell company IMO.
 

legoman666

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2003
3,628
1
0
Originally posted by: Number1
B.C. hamlet hopes to hush incessant cellphone chatter



The proposed $500,000 transmission antenna will be affixed to a CBC tower, about 300 metres from the home of 69-year-old Penny Bonnett. Fears about the impact on her health has her thinking about packing up and leaving an area she has lived in for 38 years.

While this woman is an idiot, I can see the villages point. I wouldn't mind not having a cell phone or going somewhere with no signal.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: DrPizza
?It's just another of those gizmos that change the way we act as human beings.?

Yep.
Or is it simple a device which enables an aspect of humanity to manifest itself more easily?
If people still lived in close-knit communities, there would probably still be incessant chatter, only it would be done in person. The cellphone just means that you can incessantly chatter without having to have the other person within your immediate proximity.

So perhaps it is a change in timing of behavior, but it doesn't change "the way we act as human beings," in that it doesn't change our basic nature. It merely provides another venue for existing behavioral patterns. And the result of this can be really goddamn annoying.
 

MikeyLSU

Platinum Member
Dec 21, 2005
2,747
0
71
how stupid.

There is a very simple way to not be interrupted by cellphones if you don't want to be. Turn it off for a week, or just don't get one at all. It does the same pupose but then the people who want one can still have it. Obviously not much brains in this town.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,992
18,121
126
Why is this a problem? The town decided they don't want cell coverage. If you are a cell user and do not agree with it, don't go there. Thsi is not a human rights issue...
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Originally posted by: MikeyLSU
how stupid.

There is a very simple way to not be interrupted by cellphones if you don't want to be. Turn it off for a week, or just don't get one at all. It does the same pupose but then the people who want one can still have it. Obviously not much brains in this town.

You didn't think that out. You have control over your own cell phone, but not everyone elses. The reason a town votes on this is that they want to control their entire living space, their house, their village, their shopping area, their theater, resturaunts, etc. Not only do they not want to hear their own, they don't want to hear yours, they don't want you driving with one attached to your ear, they don't want someone interrupting their conversation because of a cell phone call or talking on one during a movie. They've eliminated a whole bunch of scenarios.

Is it selfish? Yea, but it's also a majority vote.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
I think all business owners and private individuals should be allowed to have those devices that block cell phones.

Can't tell you the number of times I've went to the movies or restaurant and been seated near those assholes who have cellphones glued to their ears.

I really don't want the soccer mom in her big ass SUV on her cell phone driving all over the road either.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
haha they claim they aren't backwards, yet they refuse to allow cell phones and cable TV service in their town. Awesome.
 

rivan

Diamond Member
Jul 8, 2003
9,677
3
81
On one hand, I think cell coverage and cell phones are a good thing. They increase communication - a great thing.

However, it's current level of use makes it something between a nuisance and a danger. I'd prefer you not chat it up with Suzy about how your crepes turned out this morning while you're in the car/at the table next to me. If you're a doctor, please, by all means, take the call - but if you're in a car, please have the good sense to pull the fsk over.
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
"The proposed $500,000 transmission antenna will be affixed to a CBC tower, about 300 metres from the home of 69-year-old Penny Bonnett. Fears about the impact on her health has her thinking about packing up and leaving an area she has lived in for 38 years.:

so, living next to the tv tower was ok, but phones are different? what a bunch of assholes.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Talking in the car is one thing. But I never understood why people get upset about someone having a (reasonably volumed) conversation in a public place. If someone is siting at a restaurant alone on their cell phone, but not talking any louder than if they were talking to someone sitting across from them....how is that worse than if there WAS someone across from them? in essence its less overall noise because you don't hear the response.

Naturally there are douches that have their ringer on in public places, shout into their phone, don't pay attention to what they're doing, etc...I'm talking about those that don't do that.
 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
I appluaud their willingness to go against the grain for something they believe is right.

and, smoke another joint New Denver :p
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,992
18,121
126
Originally posted by: mundane
Luddites

not quite, wifi is there, so is wired isp.

I do like their chamber of commerce selling no cell as a feature :)

many a people will like that.

I think it's good they are doing referendum as opposed to what the nuts in Hot Fuzz do :)
 

OUCaptain

Golden Member
Nov 21, 2007
1,522
0
0
It's their town, let 'em do what they want with it. What do we care. I doubt I'll be in that town wishing my cell phone worked.

I say go for it