Recreational Marijuana Measures Pass in CO and WA

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
13,986
3,340
146
It's coming everywhere but texas soon. A decade or 2 in the future people will barely even remember that it was illegal at some point.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
From a fiscal standpoint it just makes more sense to flip something like this from an enormous expense into a revenue stream.
 

davmat787

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2010
5,512
24
76
Seattle is wonderful during the summer, start planning your trips to New Amsterdam soon!

Come December 6th, it will be legal for those 21 and older to possess up to 1oz of marijuana. Now it is up to the Obama administration and how he has the DEA react to this. Hopefully sanity will prevail, and if nothing else WA and CO will be viewed as trial runs at the federal level and thus left alone.

Let 'em go after the hardcore dangerous meth tweakers and those who smuggle illegally, there is plenty of business for law enforcement in those areas. No need for them to be worried about losing funding or jobs at this point.

Those who will choose to partake should also remember there is an onus upon them to back up their talk of being able to use the plant safely and that there will not be a rash of impaired driving incidents.

I have a feeling law enforcement will have a major hard on looking for anyway to bust someone who has pot for any other possible offense.
 
Last edited:

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
Company has already sent out a memo stating that even though these measures passed in Washington & Colorado company policy has not/will not change due to drug testing requirements set forth by our clients (military & federal/oil & gas industry/DOT)
 

davmat787

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2010
5,512
24
76
Company has already sent out a memo stating that even though these measures passed in Washington & Colorado company policy has not/will not change due to drug testing requirements set forth by our clients (military & federal/oil & gas industry/DOT)

I recommend a reply-all response that questions the companies patriotism. :D
 

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
I don't really give a sh1t. If these people cause motor accidents, pain to their own children or some other social disorder, they need to be sent directly to prison and prosecuted for recklessness.
 

Juddog

Diamond Member
Dec 11, 2006
7,851
6
81
I don't really give a sh1t. If these people cause motor accidents, pain to their own children or some other social disorder, they need to be sent directly to prison and prosecuted for recklessness.

Good thing that alcohol is legal then eh?
 

davmat787

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2010
5,512
24
76
I don't really give a sh1t. If these people cause motor accidents, pain to their own children or some other social disorder, they need to be sent directly to prison and prosecuted for recklessness.

The people who would fall in this category don't care if a drug is legal or not, and I would guess on hard drugs as well. I don't think you will see a massive amount of new users because of suddenly being legal, but who knows. This is new territory.
 

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
The one good thing about our country being broke is that it's going to get harder and harder for politicians to resist the potential revenue from taxing legal weed.
 

KAZANI

Senior member
Sep 10, 2006
527
0
0
Does the precedence of federal law mean that current cannabis-related incarcerations will not be terminated?
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Does the precedence of federal law mean that current cannabis-related incarcerations will not be terminated?

Depends on the basis for the prior conviction and whether the referendum was intended to have a retroactive effect.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Company has already sent out a memo stating that even though these measures passed in Washington & Colorado company policy has not/will not change due to drug testing requirements set forth by our clients (military & federal/oil & gas industry/DOT)

This is the same for States where medical MJ has been passed. Drug free workplace always wins.
 

Nintendesert

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2010
7,761
5
0
I can't imagine it is in any way legal to continue to hold people in prison for a crime that is no longer a crime.



I doubt people in prison are there for possession of only 1 oz of weed. :rolleyes:



I voted for this one, but realistically it won't change a ton because of the Federal government and Obama. Obama cracked down hard on California so it'll be interesting to see his response to CO.

State law isn't going to stop the DEA from busting in your door and sending you to Federal prison.

My hope is that it simply frees up our local law enforcement and judicial resources to go after all the violent crimes.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
I can't imagine it is in any way legal to continue to hold people in prison for a crime that is no longer a crime.

It was illegal when the crime was committed. that is what counts

Just like getting a violation due to a construction zone.
When the construction is finished; do any tickets issued during that time get voided? :cool:
 

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
I voted for this one, but realistically it won't change a ton because of the Federal government and Obama. Obama cracked down hard on California so it'll be interesting to see his response to CO.

State law isn't going to stop the DEA from busting in your door and sending you to Federal prison.

It would be awesome if this leads to a huge court fight. I would love to see SCOTUS say that as long as weed is grown and consumed within the boundaries of a single state then the Feds have no right to criminalize it.

Stoners for states' rights!