Torn Mind
Lifer
- Nov 25, 2012
- 12,046
- 2,763
- 136
Try turning your settings down as much as possible. If there is no change in fps in your problem scenes, there definitely is a CPU bottleneck.
CPU Speed can be modeled as the following:
CPU speed = (individual core speed)*(amount of cores utilized)
Individual core speed=IPCxclockspeed.
With a 3.5 Ghz clockspeed(4.1 Ghz Turbo Core) and maybe 10% faster IPC, an FX-6300 would be a sidegrade at best to the FX-4100(3.6 GHz stock, 3.8 Turbo) since many games don't use over 4 cores.
I say modeled because I don't know the finer details, but this will do in general for an intuitive explanation.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/701?vs=700
The FX-4300 is faster than the FX-4100(higher IPC and stock clock), but the i5 really kills it. Some benchmarks measure single-threaded performance better than multithreaded performance, such as the 1st pass of x264 or DivX encoding, while others showcase multithreaded performance, such as 7-zip or the 2nd pass of x264 encoding.
CPU Speed can be modeled as the following:
CPU speed = (individual core speed)*(amount of cores utilized)
Individual core speed=IPCxclockspeed.
With a 3.5 Ghz clockspeed(4.1 Ghz Turbo Core) and maybe 10% faster IPC, an FX-6300 would be a sidegrade at best to the FX-4100(3.6 GHz stock, 3.8 Turbo) since many games don't use over 4 cores.
I say modeled because I don't know the finer details, but this will do in general for an intuitive explanation.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/701?vs=700
The FX-4300 is faster than the FX-4100(higher IPC and stock clock), but the i5 really kills it. Some benchmarks measure single-threaded performance better than multithreaded performance, such as the 1st pass of x264 or DivX encoding, while others showcase multithreaded performance, such as 7-zip or the 2nd pass of x264 encoding.