• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

recommend a book on evolution

ZippyDan

Platinum Member
Can anyone recommend an educational book on the topic of evolution, that only seeks to teach a layperson about the ideas (and also very importantly the evidence), like a textbook would? Something that addresses criticism (religious and scientific) as a matter of course, but does not directly address other schools of thought (not looking for an anti-religious book or a book that even mentions religion, but something that would provide answers to religious claims about flaws in evolution in the course of explaining it). Something relatively recent that incorporates the most recent findings in the field and the lab would also be useful.

The ideal book would explain the introductory basics of evolutionary theory to someone from scratch, but would also contain a wealth of specific and detailed proof/evidence. In other words, not just theory and speculation that demonstrate that evolution is possible or plausible, but plenty of data demonstrating the theory in practice.

I had hoped that Dawkins' introductory "The Greatest Show on Earth" would fill this role, but as one might note in Amazon's comments, it fails in several regards:

1. Spends too much time directly addressing creationists instead of presenting evidence. And to make matters worse, does it in a frequently condescending way that will turn off most religious people.

2. Does not explain and show evidence of the embryologic and DNA evidence for skeletal homologies (e.g. branchial arch homologies in fish and higher vertebrates and jaw and earbone homologies).

3. How retroviruses demonstrate evolutionary theory

4. Spends too much time in general speculating and reasoning when he should just be piling on mountains and mountains of evidence (in easy-to-understand terms).

5. Presents several convincing conclusions as proof of evolution (which they are), but doesn't explain to the reader how these conclusions were reached (which renders the argument null).
 
If you are attempting to prove evolution to someone who has bought into the creationism garbage, don't bother. They have relegated themselves to a life of self induced idiocy, and no book is going to snap them out of it. You see, ZippyDan, the power of religion is that it is based on faith. To have faith means to believe, and continue to believe even in the absence of evidence. In the minds of fools, there is nothing more powerful. A silly thing like a book on evolution will not sway their faith. Everyone knows this.
 
If you are attempting to prove evolution to someone who has bought into the creationism garbage, don't bother. They have relegated themselves to a life of self induced idiocy, and no book is going to snap them out of it. You see, ZippyDan, the power of religion is that it is based on faith. To have faith means to believe, and continue to believe even in the absence of evidence. In the minds of fools, there is nothing more powerful. A silly thing like a book on evolution will not sway their faith. Everyone knows this.

this is just as bad as believing something because you are afraid of being ridiculed. believing based on evidence is good. believing something because if you don't believe it, then you are a called an "idiot" is just idiotic. i guess if enough people say believing X is stupid, then believing X makes you stupid. what happened to the evidence?

peer pressuring and manipulating people into believing X is the lowest form of persuasion. everyone who does this is an idiot, has no friends, will never make it in the world, and deserves to die 🙄.
 
There are plenty of good sources online with all you need to know..

I'll just leave these here for a start:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUxLR9hdorI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nTnjx-JRzE
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/beta/evolution/darwin-never-knew.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/beta/evolution/
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9953-instant-expert-evolution.html
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/search/topicbrowse2.php?topic_id=41
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1m4mATYoig
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Mtr3Cum74A
http://talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
2znweo0.jpg

m8gs9c.jpg
 
If you are attempting to prove evolution to someone who has bought into the creationism garbage, don't bother. They have relegated themselves to a life of self induced idiocy, and no book is going to snap them out of it. You see, ZippyDan, the power of religion is that it is based on faith. To have faith means to believe, and continue to believe even in the absence of evidence. In the minds of fools, there is nothing more powerful. A silly thing like a book on evolution will not sway their faith. Everyone knows this.
🙂
 
this is just as bad as believing something because you are afraid of being ridiculed. believing based on evidence is good. believing something because if you don't believe it, then you are a called an "idiot" is just idiotic. i guess if enough people say believing X is stupid, then believing X makes you stupid. what happened to the evidence?

peer pressuring and manipulating people into believing X is the lowest form of persuasion. everyone who does this is an idiot, has no friends, will never make it in the world, and deserves to die 🙄.
Believing just because not believing in some belief will cause something to happen to you is no belief at all.
 
Why not just start at the source, Darwin's "On the Origin of Species."
The book takes a very very logical approach to evolution. Since there was not as much scientific evidence around when the book was written, it uses a lot of reason and logic.
Some of the examples in the book are so fundamentally obvious that you may not even realize them till you read the book.
The book is truly the work of a genius, even the title is genius (species not life!), and the drawings are great.


It's also pretty easy to read. Anyone can read through it without having a scientific background. Makes for a good bathroom reading book...

http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Species...0342338&sr=8-1
 
Last edited:
"The Greatest Show on Earth" by Richard Dawkins

"Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact. The evidence for evolution is at least as strong as the evidence for the Holocaust, even allowing for eye witnesses to the Holocaust. It is the plain truth that we are cousins of chimpanzees, somewhat more distant cousins of monkeys, more distant cousins still of aardvarks and manatees, yet more distant cousins of bananas and turnips…continue the list as long as desired. That didn’t have to be true. It is not self-evidently, tautologically, obviously true, and there was a time when most people, even educated people, thought it wasn’t. It didn’t have to be true, but it is. We know this because a rising flood of evidence supports it. Evolution is a fact, and this book will demonstrate it. No reputable scientist disputes it, and no unbiased reader will close the book doubting it."

It's an enlightening and humorous book.
 
Carl Zimmer's Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea
This was written in part to complement NOVA's Evolution documentary & is excellent. It's thorough, it does not belabor the Creation/Evolution controversy, & Zimmer's an excellent popular science writer.

Ernst Mayr's What Evolution Is
Mayr was one of the most important architects of the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology & this book is comprehensive as well as succinct. I truly enjoy his writing style.

Sean Carroll's The Making of the Fittest
Carroll focuses primarily on how DNA is used to support the theory of evolution & succeeds remarkably well at that. His chapter on the math of evolution is one of the best I've ever read. This is imho the second best intro to evolution book written by an active professional scientist in the last few years. (Gould, for example, is great but most of his popular essays are now 20+ years old.)

Jerry Coyne's Why Evolution Is True
As others have said, thank them later. This is the best general introduction to evolution written by a practicing scientist imho in the last decade. It covers genetics, fossils, comparative anatomy, biogeography, speciation mechanisms, etc. The section on human evolution impressed me quite a bit, which is rare for such a book as I'm an evolutionary anthropologist & often underwhelmed by non-anthropologists' treatments of our own natural history.

If after you've read any of those you're interested in more beginner to intermediate books on more specific topics, let me know! Also, feel free to PM me if you have any questions about any of the material you read about.
 
Last edited:
Origin of Species dealt with "survival of the fittest". Not evolution specifically.

Yours is a common misconception. Darwin did not use the phrase 'survival of the fittest' until the 5th Ed. of On the Origin; until then he said 'natural selection,' which is what almost all modern biologists use today, at least in technical literature. 'Survival of the fittest' was coined by Spencer in his Principles of Biology.

On the Origin dealt with, well, the origin of new species. Not all evolution results in speciation, & one of Darwin's more brilliant (imho) observations was that natural selection could account for not only new species, but also, in many cases, for the variation observed in natural populations of any organism.

Nowadays, we know there are four driving mechanisms that result in evolution: genetic drift, gene flow, mutation, & natural selection. Darwin described natural selection & alluded to gene flow often, but without knowing about the nature of heredity, could not describe gene flow with the precision we can today. Nor could he describe mutation & genetic drift - both of those forces required a far more advanced understanding of DNA/heredity to describe than Darwin had available to him in the mid 1800s.
 
Back
Top