- Oct 14, 2001
- 2,492
- 3
- 81
I was brushing up on my Beowulf lore before I see the movie and I ran across this Wiki entry.
I know there was a thread about being a dick about your major. This isn't so much directed at a major, but people in general.
from Wikipedia on Beowulf:
Jane Chance (Professor of English, Rice University) in her 1980 article "The Structural Unity of Beowulf: The Problem of Grendel's Mother" argued that there are two standard interpretations of the poem: one view which suggests a two-part structure (i.e., the poem is divided between Beowulf's battles with Grendel and with the dragon) and the other, a three-part structure (this interpretation argues that Beowulf's battle with Grendel's mother is structurally separate from his battle with Grendel).[22] Chance stated that, "this view of the structure as two-part has generally prevailed since its inception in J. R. R. Tolkien's Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics in Proceedings of the British Academy 22 (1936)."[22] In contrast, she argued that the three-part structure has become "increasingly popular."[22]
Who cares if it is separated into 2 or 3 parts? Who are the people that care about this? Are they just really bored?
I know there was a thread about being a dick about your major. This isn't so much directed at a major, but people in general.
from Wikipedia on Beowulf:
Jane Chance (Professor of English, Rice University) in her 1980 article "The Structural Unity of Beowulf: The Problem of Grendel's Mother" argued that there are two standard interpretations of the poem: one view which suggests a two-part structure (i.e., the poem is divided between Beowulf's battles with Grendel and with the dragon) and the other, a three-part structure (this interpretation argues that Beowulf's battle with Grendel's mother is structurally separate from his battle with Grendel).[22] Chance stated that, "this view of the structure as two-part has generally prevailed since its inception in J. R. R. Tolkien's Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics in Proceedings of the British Academy 22 (1936)."[22] In contrast, she argued that the three-part structure has become "increasingly popular."[22]
Who cares if it is separated into 2 or 3 parts? Who are the people that care about this? Are they just really bored?