Real or Rendered?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,726
35,594
136
Originally posted by: lobadobadingdong
Real, taken with a Sony DSC-P72 No Flash 6 mm Focal Length 1/160s exposure.

At ten 'til four in the afternoon.
 

sswingle

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2000
7,183
45
91
It it weren't for the properties page telling me what kind of camera took the shot...I would guess rendered. That water looks like the water in HL2.

Comon people, if you want a real vs rendered debate, take out the camera info.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: ScottSwingleComputers
It it weren't for the properties page telling me what kind of camera took the shot...I would guess rendered. That water looks like the water in HL2.

Comon people, if you want a real vs rendered debate, take out the camera info.

You know it's just as easy to put the exif data into rendered pics, right? ;)
 

PaNsyBoy8

Golden Member
Jul 19, 2001
1,446
0
0
was kinda hard to tell from the small pic but i voted real, before i looked at the big pic
 

Dubb

Platinum Member
Mar 25, 2003
2,495
0
0
Originally posted by: Czar
real

slight lense flare effect... no self respecting computer graphics artist would add a lense flare

uhhh, wrong. I see pros do it all the time. many 3d programs have a special function for it.

cardinal rule is the flare always goes throught the center of the shot, if it doesn't, somebody either screwed up or cropped it.
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,376
1,885
126
after looking at the source at a slightly higher resolution, that's definatly real.
 

PurdueRy

Lifer
Nov 12, 2004
13,837
4
0
Originally posted by: BurnItDwn
after looking at the source at a slightly higher resolution, that's definatly real.

PEOPLE ITS IN THE PHOTOGRAPHY SECTION OF COURSE ITS REAL!!!

BAH!
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
It's quite obvious that some people here cannot tell the difference between a computer generated image and a picture of the real outdoors.

That's pretty sad.
 

Crono

Lifer
Aug 8, 2001
23,720
1,503
136
After checking the link to the source image, I have brilliantly concluded that it is real :D

NOTE: At first I thought it was rendered
 

mobobuff

Lifer
Apr 5, 2004
11,099
1
81
Originally posted by: Eli
It's quite obvious that some people here cannot tell the difference between a computer generated image and a picture of the real outdoors.

That's pretty sad.

Agreed.

You don't need a bigger version of the image to tell that it's real. C'mon now people.
 

PurdueRy

Lifer
Nov 12, 2004
13,837
4
0
Originally posted by: Eli
It's quite obvious that some people here cannot tell the difference between a computer generated image and a picture of the real outdoors.

That's pretty sad.


Line stealer ;)

Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Well at least we know half of anandtech can't tell what it looks like OUTSIDE from CG....sounds about right

:p
 

Legend

Platinum Member
Apr 21, 2005
2,254
1
0
I voted rendered, because I've seen many very detailed renders lately that look very real (at high res), but have a sort of surreal lighting effect that looks very similar to that pic.
 

TallBill

Lifer
Apr 29, 2001
46,017
62
91
based on the tiny pic it looks rendered.. its pretty obvious that its real when you blow it up though.
 

loup garou

Lifer
Feb 17, 2000
35,132
1
81
Originally posted by: Legend
I voted rendered, because I've seen many very detailed renders lately that look very real (at high res), but have a sort of surreal lighting effect that looks very similar to that pic.
:speechless:
 

illusion88

Lifer
Oct 2, 2001
13,164
3
81
No one ****** cares if you have some image that is difficult to tell if it's real or rendered. Stop with these threads!
 
Oct 20, 2005
10,978
44
91
Originally posted by: illusion88
No one ****** cares if you have some image that is difficult to tell if it's real or rendered. Stop with these threads!

But it's really funny to see people say that it's rendered based on their oh so awesome keen sense of sight. They're all like "yeah, that <insert object> just gave it away" ... or... "hmm...that <insert object> just doesn't sit right with me", and then BAM, it's a real image and they never ever post again :p
 

YOyoYOhowsDAjello

Moderator<br>A/V & Home Theater<br>Elite member
Aug 6, 2001
31,205
45
91
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Real..because I was there in April of 2004. Pics to prove it too.

Pic from the boat...

Inside the red-roofed church.

Pic on the boat that takes you there.

BTW, it is the Konigsee.

Just b/c the place actually exists doesn't mean the photo can't be rendered.

But I'm not saying it is rendered, I voted for real....just saying that a real place can be rendered as well.

I'll render you senseless