• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Readers Digest files for bankruptcy

Guess the internet continues to hurt printed media. I have read readers digest for over 20 years. I always read the laughter the best medicine parts when I went to see my grandma. Also liked the condensed books.

http://online.wsj.com/article/...O-20090817-707854.html
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--The Reader's Digest Association Inc., which was taken private just over two years ago, said it reached an agreement with its lenders on a restructuring plan that it will likely complete under a prepackaged bankruptcy filing in order to reduce its debt.

The company, which publishes the magazine of the same name and also has marketing operations, also chose not to make a $27 million interest payment due Monday on its 9% senior subordinated notes due 2017. It said it would use the 30-day grace period available to continue discussions with its lenders.

Under the debt-restructuring deal, the company's senior secured lenders will exchange what it said was "a substantial portion" of the company's $1.6 billion in debt for stock.

Earlier this year, Bloomberg News reported Reader's Digest had hired legal counsel to look at restructuring options, including a possible bankruptcy filing.

A steering committee including JPMorgan Chase, GE Capital, Eaton Vance, Ares, Regiment and Bank of America Merrill Lynch will provide $150 million in debtor-in-possession financing that will be convertible into exit financing, according to a person familiar with the situation. The company said it expects the DIP loan will be enough liquidity during the reorganization and beyond. The DIP loan is new money for the company, meaning none of Reader's Digest's existing loans are being rolled into the facility.

Interest on the DIP is 10% over the London interbank offered rate or Libor, with a Libor floor of 3.5%, according to Standard & Poor's LCD unit. This means that under no circumstances will the lenders earn less than 13.5% annual interest. The DIP is expected to be syndicated. The interest is the same as Lear Corp., the maker of automotive seats and interior electronics, is paying on its $500 million DIP.

The company will emerge from bankruptcy with $550 million in debt left on its balance sheet, 75% less than what it has now. The bankruptcy filing will apply only to the company's U.S. businesses.

Reader's Digest said it is still in compliance with its financial covenants.

The firm's bonds haven't traded so far Monday, according to online trading platform MarketAxess, which shows that the 9% notes due 2017 last traded on July 30 at six cents on the dollar.

Reader's Digest term loan on the other hand is a touch higher following Monday's news and is quoted around the high-30 cents on the dollar, according to LCD. That's against versus 36.5/37.5 cents at close of business Friday.

The company was taken private in a Ripplewood Holdings-led leveraged buyout in Feb. 2007. JPMorgan, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch and Royal Bank of Scotland led a $1.61 billion loan backing the takeover, according to LCD data. There was also a $600 million high-yield bond supporting the deal.
 
Wow...my mom had a sub and I used to read a couple of the sections every month (or however often it was delivered). I rather enjoyed it, that's too bad.
 
I liked the short articles, but I've never liked the concept of condensed books. If it's worth reading, it's worth reading the whole thing imo.
 
at one time I think it was the most popular magazine or something.

yeah I remember reading it at grandmothers. it was pretty lousy thinking back on it as an adult now
 
One of the best prints out there. Sad to see it end. I loved the vocabulary part, a shame really. There was not a lot of advertising in Readers Digest and their mission was sound.

A sad day.
 
Originally posted by: cheezy321
How can a magazine get 1.6 BILLION dollars into debt?

How long were the losing money?

Insanity.

I always wonder this about any company.

I mean, if a company does it's month end and realize there's a loss of money, wouldn't a company do something about it NOW? Why wait so long? This goes for the car industry. Why did they all wait so long to realize they were doing bad?
 
didn't like the overt christian overtones in reader's digest, but it was an okay read.
 
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
Originally posted by: cheezy321
How can a magazine get 1.6 BILLION dollars into debt?

How long were the losing money?
Insanity.
I always wonder this about any company.

I mean, if a company does it's month end and realize there's a loss of money, wouldn't a company do something about it NOW? Why wait so long? This goes for the car industry. Why did they all wait so long to realize they were doing bad?
Like any big company that takes a loss, they probably thought it could be ridden out or that things would turn around on their own, provided the company didnt go crazy and do lots of radical changes on short notice.
But a loss in the billions tells me they were utterly incompetent.
They couldnt figure anything out because they didnt have the sharpest businessmen in the world. Perhaps they were so used to a constant slow profit (based on the history of their company) and didnt know how to deal with serious problems. The general rule in business is you have to keep growing or you'll die. I dont see how Readers Digest could possibly keep growing, even slowly. Sooner or later the facts that old folks die off and young folks do more online reading would have to catch up with them.
 
Sad to see it go, they were an icon, but their kind of print media is one of buggy whips of today.
 
Originally posted by: cheezy321
How can a magazine get 1.6 BILLION dollars into debt?

How long were the losing money?

Insanity.

they were only private for 2 years. I was thinking the same thing. How the FUCK do you rack up 1.6 billion in debt in 2 years? Some banks that went under didn't even do that
 
The debt was incurred taking the company private. I have no idea of the demographics of the magazine but I am guessing it skews to an older, less attractive (to advertisers) audience. Of course, the US population is growing older on average so in theory their market should be expanding.

-KeithP
 
Originally posted by: MrMatt
Originally posted by: cheezy321
How can a magazine get 1.6 BILLION dollars into debt?

How long were the losing money?

Insanity.

they were only private for 2 years. I was thinking the same thing. How the FUCK do you rack up 1.6 billion in debt in 2 years? Some banks that went under didn't even do that

It was a leveraged buyout. They borrowed that money to buy the company, they were that much in debt before they even started.
 
Back
Top