Dar Al-Hayat.com
Below is an excerpt from an editorial that appeared on the Web site of the London-based, Saudi-owned media organization.
Frankly, I missed Mohammad Said al-Sahhaf. He is the only Iraqi official who I think deserves full amnesty on all his previous crimes, because of his cuteness when he was lying in the face of the disaster. But where is Mohammad Said al-Sahhaf? Where are Saddam and his sons? Where is Tarek Aziz? Where is the rest of the gang?
I heard that al-Sahhaf has been captured, and then he issued a statement denying it, and declaring that he was the one who actually captured the Americans. Then I heard that when Saddam's statue was destroyed in Baghdad, al-Sahhaf made a statement to say that the statue was for one of Saddam's doubles.
As for Saddam Hussein, I heard that he was under one of his demolished palaces, or in Russia, or Syria, or Cuba or Tikrit.... Let's assume that Saddam was arrested, how would we know it is he and not one of his doubles? The Americans say that they have proof, for they have DNA. How are they sure that they have Saddam's DNA, and not the DNA of one of his substitutes?
Below is an excerpt from an editorial that appeared on the Web site of the London-based, Saudi-owned media organization.
Frankly, I missed Mohammad Said al-Sahhaf. He is the only Iraqi official who I think deserves full amnesty on all his previous crimes, because of his cuteness when he was lying in the face of the disaster. But where is Mohammad Said al-Sahhaf? Where are Saddam and his sons? Where is Tarek Aziz? Where is the rest of the gang?
I heard that al-Sahhaf has been captured, and then he issued a statement denying it, and declaring that he was the one who actually captured the Americans. Then I heard that when Saddam's statue was destroyed in Baghdad, al-Sahhaf made a statement to say that the statue was for one of Saddam's doubles.
As for Saddam Hussein, I heard that he was under one of his demolished palaces, or in Russia, or Syria, or Cuba or Tikrit.... Let's assume that Saddam was arrested, how would we know it is he and not one of his doubles? The Americans say that they have proof, for they have DNA. How are they sure that they have Saddam's DNA, and not the DNA of one of his substitutes?
?
Facebook
Twitter