• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Reaction time test.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: MS Dawn
What does age have to do with this?

BAC certainly would affect it though. :laugh:
Click to expand...

Reaction time slows down with age.

Believe me, you don't see me posting my times.

 
.2062 - first attempt

refreshed - second attempt 😛

.1717 - third attempt (rocketing rabbit)


<---- nearly twice your age 😉

 
Originally posted by: jadinolf
Originally posted by: MS Dawn
What does age have to do with this?

BAC certainly would affect it though. :laugh:
Click to expand...

Reaction time slows down with age.

Believe me, you don't see me posting my times.
Click to expand...

True. But until you hit the big five oh, you can whip the whipper snappers into shape.

Reference tennis, baseball, soccer and just about any other sport.
 
I'm 17
.1994
.1672
.2136

avg 1.934

Flubbed the last one because the 5th one went right after the 4th and juked me out =(.
 
clamum said:
First try: .2324
Second try: .2256
Third try: .1886

Average: .2155

Age 23.
Click to expand...
I was scanning old threads for poops and giggles and because of reasons so I tried this again.

I'm now 35, here's my times:
0.234
0.217
0.170
0.213
0.187
Average: .2042

So basically the same or even a scoatch faster. Wouldn't have expected that (I hardly game anymore too).
 
Captante said:
Holy crap .... an interesting/useful necro!

Good job! 😛
Click to expand...
Lol! C'mon folks, try it again! Oh wait, probably 99% of those original posters aren't here anymore. :-(

It was interesting scanning those old threads. It took me fricking forever to get back to 2006, though.

And I couldn't just bookmark the spot (to move forward through time you gotta hit the Back button) so now if I wanna resume, I'll have to spend another twenty minutes clicking to get back to late 2006. And then if I leave my computer or want to resume at a later date, I gotta do it all over again. Bah.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top